ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1053

Outcomes of Immune Check Point Inhibitor Use in US Veterans with Pre-Existing Inflammatory Muscle Disease

Denis Krutko1, Selene Rubino1, Brian Sauer2, Jorge Rojas Jr3, Gary Kunkel1, Jessica A Walsh4, Shardool Patel5, Grant Cannon6 and Tawnie Braaten1, 1University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 2Salt Lake City VA/University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 3Puget Sound VA and University of Utah, Seattle, WA, 4Salt Lake City Veterans Affairs Health and University of Utah Health, Division of Rheumatology, Salt Lake City, UT, 5Salt Lake City Veterans Affairs Health and University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, 6University of Utah and Salt Lake City VA, Salt Lake City, UT

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: autoimmune diseases, dermatomyositis, Mortality, Myositis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 13, 2023

Title: (1052–1081) Immunological Complications of Medical Therapy Poster

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Data on Immune Checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) use in patients with previously diagnosed inflammatory muscle disease (IMD) is limited as these patients were excluded from clinical trials. There is a concern that use of ICIs in patients with pre-existing IMD may have flares of their disease, increased morbidity, and/or higher mortality with ICI treatment.  We identified all patients diagnosed with IMD prior to ICI infusion in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) and analyzed these patients’ demographics, diagnoses, laboratory findings, clinical course, and mortality in comparison to other Veterans treated with ICIs.

Methods: This analysis used data from the VHA Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW) for demographics, ICD codes, and pharmacy information, VA cancer registry for cancer diagnosis, and all-cause mortality from the Death Ascertainment File (DAF).  Veterans who received one or more ICI infusions between 6/6/2011 and 2/14/2023 were evaluated as potential IMD cases if they had two or more myositis ICD-9 or ICD-10 codes associated with a rheumatology or neurology clinic visit at least 30 days apart and both visits occurred prior to the ICI treatment.  Cases meeting these criteria underwent electronic medical record review using the Compensation and Pension Record Interchange (CAPRI) to determine if the case met American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for IMD.  Demographic features and mortality of confirmed cases were compared to patients receiving ICI without pre-existing IMD.   IMD cases were also reviewed to determine if patients developed a myositis flare.

Results: We identified 29,539 patients who received at least one ICI infusion in the VHA.  Of these patients, 13 met IMD screening criteria with 8 patients having confirmed IMD by ACR criteria (dermatomyositis 3, polymyositis 2, anti-synthetase syndrome 2, and RA/myositis overlap 1).  All patients were white males with an average age of 71.7 years at the time of first ICI infusion.  Primary cancer diagnoses were lung – 2, melanoma – 2, head and neck – 2 kidney/other urinary – 1, and mesothelioma – 1.  Four patients were treated with nivolumab and four patients with pembrolizumab (Table 1). Diagnosis of IMD was made on average 3.1 years prior to treatment with ICI.  One patient with dermatomyositis had an IMD flared after two doses of ICI and was treated successfully with steroids and IVIG.  No IMD flares were identified in the other seven patients.  There was no difference in Kaplan Meier Survival Analysis for IMD patients in comparison to patients treated with ICI without IMD (p=0.40 by log rank test) (Figure 1).

Conclusion: Overall mortality in these 8 patients with IMD treated with an ICI was similar to other ICI treated Veterans.  Among the 8 IMD patients, only one developed an IMD flare after ICI treatment that responded to glucocorticoids and IVIG therapy.  These findings suggest that ICI therapy can be considered in IMD patients with close monitoring.  Future research is needed to better understand the risk of IMD flare and outcomes in patients with established IMD treated with ICIs.

Supporting image 1

Table 1: Comparison of Patients with Established Inflammatory Muscle Disease (IMD) Prior to ICI Treatment to Patients without IMD

Supporting image 2

Figure 1: Comparing Survival of Patients on ICI Therapy with Pre-Existing IMD to those without IMD


Disclosures: D. Krutko: None; S. Rubino: None; B. Sauer: None; J. Rojas Jr: None; G. Kunkel: None; J. Walsh: AbbVie, 5, Amgen, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, Janssen, 2, Merck, 5, Novartis, 2, Pfizer, 2, 5, UCB Pharma, 2; S. Patel: None; G. Cannon: None; T. Braaten: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Krutko D, Rubino S, Sauer B, Rojas Jr J, Kunkel G, Walsh J, Patel S, Cannon G, Braaten T. Outcomes of Immune Check Point Inhibitor Use in US Veterans with Pre-Existing Inflammatory Muscle Disease [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/outcomes-of-immune-check-point-inhibitor-use-in-us-veterans-with-pre-existing-inflammatory-muscle-disease/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/outcomes-of-immune-check-point-inhibitor-use-in-us-veterans-with-pre-existing-inflammatory-muscle-disease/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology