ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1803

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte Ratio Among Flaring and Non-flaring Uncontrolled Gout Patients Undergoing Pegloticase Therapy as Part of the Phase 3 Pivotal Trials

Michael Pillinger1, Katie Obermeyer2, Lissa Padnick-Silver2 and Brian LaMoreaux2, 1NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, 2Horizon Therapeutics plc, Deerfield, IL

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Biomarkers, gout, Inflammation

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2022

Title: Metabolic and Crystal Arthropathies – Basic and Clinical Science Poster

Session Type: Poster Session D

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: Gout flares result from an innate immune response against monosodium urate crystal deposits, resulting in macrophage crystal phagocytosis and cellular activation.1 NLRP3 inflammasome activation results in release of pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL-1b), attracting and stimulating bloodstream neutrophils, including triggering neutrophil extracellular traps (NETosis). The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a biomarker for systemic inflammation and is increased in patients with active polyarticular gout.2 However, little is known about the relationship between NLR and gout flare in patients undergoing urate-lowering therapy, or how treatment response influences NLR. We examined NLR changes in uncontrolled gout patients administered pegloticase as part of two pivotal trials.

Methods: Data from gout patients treated fortnightly with pegloticase (8 mg, 12 infusions) in two parallel phase 3 randomized trials were assessed by urate-lowering response (serum urate < 6 mg/dL for ≥80% of Months 3 and 6) and flare (upper flare tertile, ≥4 flares during pegloticase treatment) status. NLR was determined at baseline (BL, before pegloticase dose 1) and at Wks 7, 13, 19, and 25. Change from BL to Wk 25 was analyzed using a mixed model for repeated measures adjusting for age, visit, colchicine use (yes/no), group, and interaction between visit and group.

Results: 36 (72.2% men, 61.2±14.2 yrs) and 49 (85.7% men, 52.7±15.6 yrs) patients were pegloticase responders and non-responders, respectively. Mean (±SD) BL NLR was similar between responders (3.39±2.73) and non-responders (4.23±2.80, p=0.132) and near or above the normal NLR range (0.78─3.533). NLR peaked in responders (4.59±5.62) and non-responders (4.94±5.40) at Wk 13, returning to BL by Wk 25. Patients in the flare (3.75±2.38) and no flare (3.55±2.14) groups had similar BL NLR values. Median time to first flare was 9 days following first pegloticase infusion and flare rates progressively decreased following Month 1. Whereas peak mean (95%CI) change from BL in NLR was observed at Wk 13 in the flare group (+2.54 [+1.08, +4.00]; no meaningful change during treatment in the no flare group; Figure).

Conclusion: Sustained urate-lowering had little effect on NLR over the first 6 months of pegloticase therapy. However, flare patients had a significant NLR increase following therapy initiation, suggesting heightened systemic inflammation. Flare rates progressively decreased following treatment Month 1, but peak NLR occurred between Wks 13 and 19. Therefore, even though gout flares are generally thought of as local attacks, our findings suggest that heightened systemic inflammation persists for weeks to months following flare. Whether peak NLR at Wk 13 was a consequence of flare, or indicates a predisposition to flare and/or rising NLR remains unknown. Given that elevated NLR is associated with renal, cardiovascular, and overall mortality,4 further investigation in gout patients is warranted.

References

  1. So AK, Martinon F. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2017;13:639-47.
  2. Vedder D, et al. Arthritis Res Ther 2020;22:148.
  3. Forget P, et al. BMC Research Notes 2017;10:12.
  4. Song M, et al. Sci Rep 2021;11:464.

Supporting image 1

Figure. Least-square mean change from baseline in neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in patients with and without gout flare during pegloticase treatment. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to first pegloticase infusion. Mixed model of repeated measures analysis. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals.


Disclosures: M. Pillinger, Horizon Therapeutics, Sobi, Fortress Bioscience, Hikma; K. Obermeyer, Horizon Therapeutics; L. Padnick-Silver, Horizon Therapeutics; B. LaMoreaux, Horizon Therapeutics.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Pillinger M, Obermeyer K, Padnick-Silver L, LaMoreaux B. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte Ratio Among Flaring and Non-flaring Uncontrolled Gout Patients Undergoing Pegloticase Therapy as Part of the Phase 3 Pivotal Trials [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/neutrophil-to-lymphocyte-ratio-among-flaring-and-non-flaring-uncontrolled-gout-patients-undergoing-pegloticase-therapy-as-part-of-the-phase-3-pivotal-trials/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/neutrophil-to-lymphocyte-ratio-among-flaring-and-non-flaring-uncontrolled-gout-patients-undergoing-pegloticase-therapy-as-part-of-the-phase-3-pivotal-trials/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology