ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0537

Neutrophil Extracellular Traps as a Biomarker to Predict Outcomes in Lupus Nephritis

Laura Patricia Whittall Garcia1, Farnoosh Naderinavi1, Zahi Touma2, Dafna Gladman3, Murray Urowitz4, Anna Konvalinka1 and Joan Wither5, 1University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Schroeder Arthritis Institute, Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 3Toronto Western Hospital, Schroeder Arthritis Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada, 4University of Toronto, University Health Network, Schroeder Arthritis Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada, 5Schroeder Arthritis Institute, Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Lupus nephritis, neutrophils, prognostic factors, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 12, 2022

Title: Abstracts: SLE – Diagnosis, Manifestations, and Outcomes I: Renal Aspects

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETs) have been implicated in Lupus Nephritis (LN) pathogenesis. SLE neutrophils release High Mobility Group Box-1 (HMGB1) protein, in turn, HMGB1 in NETs correlates with histologic findings of Active LN (ALN). The aim was to determine if the amount of NET complexes (Elastase-DNA and HMGB1-DNA) in serum at the time of a LN flare predicts renal outcomes in the following 24 months.

Methods: The study had a 2-staged approach. In an exploratory cohort composed of active SLE (clinical SLEDAI ≥ 1), inactive SLE and healthy controls (HC), we assessed the association between our in-house ELISA assays for Elastase-DNA and HMGB1-DNA complexes and ALN. A separate LN cohort was then used to determine the utility of NET complexes to predict renal outcomes over the subsequent 24 months. All patients had ALN, defined as a 24-hour urine protein >500mg with a subsequent modification in therapy by the treating physician, a baseline eGFR >30ml/min (3 months prior to the flare), stored serum sample ±3 months from the renal flare, and at least 2-years follow-up. The following outcomes were ascertained: Complete response (CR) at 12 and 24 months after flare (proteinuria < 500mg/day and a serum creatinine within 15% of the baseline); severe renal impairment (eGFR≤30ml/min) at 12 and 24 months after flare; and the percentage decline in the eGFR over the 24 months after flare.

Results: Ninety-two individuals were included in the exploratory cohort (49 active SLE, 23 inactive SLE and 20 HC). NET complexes were significantly higher in SLE patients compared to HC and tended to be higher in active SLE compared to inactive patients. Patients with ALN (36.7%) had significantly higher levels of NET complexes compared to active SLE without LN. Furthermore, patients with proliferative LN had higher levels of NET complexes compared to non-proliferative LN (Figure 1).

The LN cohort included 109 ALN patients. The median (IQR) age was 29 (23-41) years, 84% were women, and disease duration was 6.4 (0.8-10.5) years. 37.9% were Caucasian, 22.2% Black and 17.5% Asian, the baseline eGFR was 112 (97-127) ml/min. 77.9% had a kidney biopsy at the time of the LN flare, of whom 55.9% had a proliferative or mixed class, 17.4% class V, and 4.5% class I or II. 39.4% and 50.5% of the ALN patients achieved CR at 12 and 24 months, respectively and 11% had an eGFR ≤ 30ml/min after 24 months.

Similar to the results from the exploratory cohort, proliferative LN had higher levels of NET complexes compared to non-proliferative LN patients (Elastase-DNA: 111.7 vs 25.9, p=0.0003; HMGB1-DNA: 85.2 vs 25.4, p=0.002, proliferative vs non-proliferative, respectively). Patients with higher baseline levels of NET complexes had higher odds of not achieving CR and of having severe renal impairment after 24 months of the flare. NET complexes outperformed conventional biomarkers (Table 1). There was a linear relationship between the amount of baseline Elastase-DNA and HMGB1-DNA complexes and the decline in renal function in the subsequent 24 months (Figure 2).

Conclusion: Elastase-DNA and HMGB1-DNA complexes predicted renal outcomes, including response to therapy and decline in kidney function at 2 years after the LN flare.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: L. Whittall Garcia, None; F. Naderinavi, None; Z. Touma, None; D. Gladman, AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Gilead, Novartis, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), Galapagos, UCB Pharma, Celgene; M. Urowitz, None; A. Konvalinka, None; J. Wither, AstraZeneca, Pfizer.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Whittall Garcia L, Naderinavi F, Touma Z, Gladman D, Urowitz M, Konvalinka A, Wither J. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps as a Biomarker to Predict Outcomes in Lupus Nephritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/neutrophil-extracellular-traps-as-a-biomarker-to-predict-outcomes-in-lupus-nephritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/neutrophil-extracellular-traps-as-a-biomarker-to-predict-outcomes-in-lupus-nephritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology