ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0571

National Rollout of a Medication Safety Dashboard to Improve Testing for Latent Infections Among Biologic/targeted Synthetic DMARD Users Within the Veterans Health Administration: Initial Results

Anna Montgomery1, Gary Tarasovsky2, Mary Whooley2, Jennifer Barton3, Karla Miller4, Holly Mitchell5, Jo Dana2, Kimberly Reiter6, Elizabeth Wahl7, Karine Rozenberg-Ben-Dror8, Jing Li9 and Gabriela Schmajuk10, 1University of California San Francisco, Reno, NV, 2San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, 3VA Portland Health Care System/OHSU, Portland, OR, 4University of Utah Division of Rheumatology/VA Salt Lake City Health Care, Salt Lake City, UT, 5Ralph H. Johnson VA Hospital, Mount Pleasant, SC, 6Albuquerque VA Medical Center, Albuquerque, NM, 7VA Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, WA, 8Greater Lakes Region/VISN 12 Dept Veterans Affairs, Hines, IL, 9University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 10UCSF / SFVA, San Francisco, CA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards), Health policy, Intervention, Measurement Instrument, quality of care

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2022

Title: Abstracts: Measures and Measurement of Healthcare Quality

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 8:00AM-9:00AM

Background/Purpose: Guidelines recommend testing for latent hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and tuberculosis (TB) infection prior to initiating biologics or targeted synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) to avoid reactivation of these life-threatening infections. Despite these recommendations, previous studies have found that a minority of patients in U.S. rheumatology practices have documented testing for all latent infections. We developed and tested a web-based dashboard for clinicians within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) with the goal of improving the safe prescribing of b/tsDMARDs.

Methods: The dashboard was created using Power BI (Microsoft), a data management software package, and launched on 1/11/2022. Data displayed on the dashboard are extracted from the VHA corporate data warehouse and includes patient identifiers, prescribed b/tsDMARDs, most recent prescription date, dates of testing for HBV (surface antigen (or viral load) AND core antibody); HCV (antibody or viral load); and TB (PPD, Interferon-Gamma Release Assay, or evidence of treatment). National and facility-level performance (percent of patients with complete testing) are shown for benchmarking (Figure 1). Clinicians can access the dashboard via the VHA intranet and use the information to enter missing test orders directly into the EHR.

We performed an interrupted time-series (ITS) analysis to assess whether use of the dashboard affected the percent of patients with complete testing across 129 VHA facilities. Facilities were divided into 2 groups according to the total of dashboard logins from that facility (above/below the median, those with > 8 logins were designated “routine users” vs. ≤ 8 logins “limited/non-users”). The percent of patients with complete testing was assessed weekly between 11/1/2021 – 1/10/2022 (prior to dashboard launch, “baseline period”) and 1/11/2022 – 5/9/2022 (after dashboard launch, “intervention period”). We compared routine vs. limited/non-users using an ITS model which adjusted for facility-level characteristics.

Results: There were 50,176 Veterans prescribed b/tsDMARDs nationwide. 31 facilities qualified as routine users and 98 were limited/non-users. Across all sites at baseline, 62.7% of patients had complete testing. The percent of patients with complete testing improved for routine users during the study period (63.6% to 69.6%), whereas limited/non-users remained stable (61.9% to 62.9%). The post-intervention linear trend for routine vs. limited/non-users was 0.23, 95% CI (0.17-0.28, p = 0.01; Figure 2), representing a small but significant improvement for routine users over this 7-month period.

Conclusion: Use of a medication safety dashboard designed to support the safe prescribing of b/tsDMARDs resulted in small but significant improvements among facilities who used the dashboard routinely compared to those with fewer logins. We anticipate further improvements over time and as additional facilities achieve routine use. Rapid deployment of EHR-based dashboards can facilitate quality improvement by providing actionable reports directly to clinicians.

Supporting image 1

Figure 1. DMARD Patient Safety Dashboard (displays fictitious patient and provider information).

Supporting image 2

Figure 2. Actual and predicted percent of patients in the VHA using biologic or targeted-synthetic DMARDs with complete testing for latent infections (HBV, HCV, TB). Predicted percents are derived from an interrupted time series (ITS) model which adjusted for facility-level covariates, including facility complexity and the number of patients prescribed b/tsDMARDs. FootnoteL Percent of patients with complete testing is captured via the dashboard in weekly intervals. Dotted line represents the intervention date in the ITS analysis (January 11th, 2022; date on which the dashboard was available to all VHA facilities). Routine vs. limited/non-users of the dashboard were defined based on the number of logins from a specific facility (above/below the median, those with > 8 logins were designated “routine users” vs. ≤ 8 logins “limited/non-users”).


Disclosures: A. Montgomery, None; G. Tarasovsky, None; M. Whooley, None; J. Barton, None; K. Miller, None; H. Mitchell, None; J. Dana, None; K. Reiter, None; E. Wahl, None; K. Rozenberg-Ben-Dror, None; J. Li, None; G. Schmajuk, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Montgomery A, Tarasovsky G, Whooley M, Barton J, Miller K, Mitchell H, Dana J, Reiter K, Wahl E, Rozenberg-Ben-Dror K, Li J, Schmajuk G. National Rollout of a Medication Safety Dashboard to Improve Testing for Latent Infections Among Biologic/targeted Synthetic DMARD Users Within the Veterans Health Administration: Initial Results [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/national-rollout-of-a-medication-safety-dashboard-to-improve-testing-for-latent-infections-among-biologic-targeted-synthetic-dmard-users-within-the-veterans-health-administration-initial-results/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/national-rollout-of-a-medication-safety-dashboard-to-improve-testing-for-latent-infections-among-biologic-targeted-synthetic-dmard-users-within-the-veterans-health-administration-initial-results/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology