ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meeting Abstracts
    • All Meetings
    • PRSYM 2026
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • Download Abstract Supplements
  • Keyword Index
  • My Favorites
    • View & print my favorites
  • Search

Home » Meeting Abstracts » ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting 2017

Abstract Number: 2621

Minimal Renal Affection in Patients with Systemic LUPUS Erythematosus: Characteristics and Evolution

TC Salman-Monte1, Eva Rodriguez2, José Luis Arevalos3, María José Soler3, Clara Barrios3, Jordi Carbonell4 and Julio Pascual3, 1Rheumatology, Hospital del Mar/Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain, 2Nephrology, Hospital del Mar/ Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain, 3Nephrology, Hospital del Mar/Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain, 4Rheumatology Unit, Hospital del Mar/Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain

Share on X (Twitter) Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on Email
Print

Meeting: ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting 2017

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Nephritis, proteinuria, renal disease and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 7, 2017

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster III: Therapeutics and Clinical Trial Design

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Lupus nephritis (LN) is the most common organ involvement in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). Indications of renal biopsy (RB) are deterioration of renal function and / or activity in sediment and / or proteinuria> 0.5g / 24h or urine protein: creatinine ratio (P:C ratio) > 0.5 (SEN consensus 2012). There are patients who show data of “minimal renal involvement” (MRI) without indication of RB. Our objective is to determine if these patients present clinical and analytical characteristics that allow them to differentiate from patients with LN.

Methods:

We reviewed 171 patients with SLE diagnosis, classifying them as MRI if they showed> 3 occasions at least 1 year, proteinuria determinations = 0.3 g / 24h or P:C ratio= 0.3, ruling out urologic pathology. We have compared clinical and analytical variables of MRI vs LN at the time of SLE diagnosis, at renal involvement diagnosis and last visit.

Results:

We identified 38 (18.7%) patients with MRI and 41 (24%) patients with LN. At the time of SLE diagnosis, the MRI group had a lower titer of anti-DNAds (14.8% vs 42.1%, p = 0.01), anti-Sm (12% vs 32.2%, p = 0.04), presence of lupus anticoagulant (38%, p = 0.01) and anticardiolipin IgG (11% vs 38%, p = 0.01), less severe C3 hypocomplementemia (70 ± 34 vs 86.9 ± 32.7 mg / dl, p = 0.04), C4 (14 ± 10 vs 17 (p = 0.04) and CH50 (33.3 ± 15 vs 49.6 ± 17.4 mg / dl, p = 0.04); and lower inflammatory parameters: ESR (23.1 ± 20 vs 58.9 ± 42 mg / dl, p = 0.01), CRP (12.7±11.8 vs 27.3±17 mg/dl, p=0.02). At the diagnosis of the renal involvement, these results were confirmed (Table) and we observed that, in MRI patients, proteinuria appeared at an older age, with a higher evolution of SLE (12.7 ± 11.8 vs 27.3 ± 17 mg / dl, p = 0.02) and with absence of previous immunosuppressant therapy. After a mean follow-up of 10 ± 6.6 years, no MRI patient presented a renal flare, maintaining stable the renal function.

LUPUS NEPHRITIS

(n=41)

MINIMAL RENAL INVOLVEMENT (MRI) n=38

p

Sex (Female/Male)

30/11

29/3

0.05

Age (years)

38 ± 16

45 ± 17

0.07

Follow up time (years)

3.4 ± 5.5

5.8 ± 4

0.01

Creat (mg/dl)

1.3 ± 1.3

0.7 ± 0.2

0.02

URINE SEDIMENT

  • Negative

  • Hematuria

  • Leukocyturia

  • Changes in sediment

14 (35%)

3 (7,5%)

9 (22.5%)

14 (35%)

32 (100%)

NA

Proteinuria (mg/24h)

2044 ± 2700

266 ± 71.6

NA

(P:C ratio) (mg/gr)

1761,7 ±1446

232 ± 172

NA

HT (n, %)

3 (13%)

2 (6%)

0.6

DM2 (n, %)

2 (8%)

2 (6%)

0.7

DNA-crithiida

26 (74.3)

9 (37.5)

0.005

Anti-SSARO (IA)

13 (38.2%)

12 (38.7%)

0.5

Anti-La (IA)

8 (23.5%)

5 (16.1%)

0.3

Anti-RNP (IA)

13 (39.4%)

7 (24.1%)

0.1

Anti-Sm (IA)

13 (39.4%)

4 (14.3%)

0.002

C3 (mg/dl)

70±21.9

130±10

0.001

C4 (mg/dl)

16.1±3.9

26±10.8

0.001

C1q (mg/dl)

16.5±11

26±12.3

0.001

CH50 (U/mL)

34±5.3

71.0±15

0.001

Immunosuppressants

  • Micophenolic acid

  • Azathioprine

  • Hydroxyclorochine

15 (38.5%)

20%

13%

20%

25 (78,1%)

4%

88%

32%

0.001

0.1

0.001

0.003

Corticosteroids

19 (50%)

15 (46.9%)

0.4

Conclusion:

Our results showed that patients with MRI had a lower clinical and biological SLE activity, both at SLE diagnosis and at the diagnosis of renal involvement. No MRI patients presented a LN flare during the follow-up although it is difficult to know the role played by the immunosuppressant treatment.



Disclosure: T. Salman-Monte, None; E. Rodriguez, None; J. L. Arevalos, None; M. J. Soler, None; C. Barrios, None; J. Carbonell, None; J. Pascual, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Salman-Monte T, Rodriguez E, Arevalos JL, Soler MJ, Barrios C, Carbonell J, Pascual J. Minimal Renal Affection in Patients with Systemic LUPUS Erythematosus: Characteristics and Evolution [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/minimal-renal-affection-in-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-characteristics-and-evolution/. Accessed .

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/minimal-renal-affection-in-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-characteristics-and-evolution/

My Favorites

Save and print abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract (must have cookies enabled in browser). See saved favorites.

Abstract Policies

  • ACR Convergence Abstract Embargo Policies
  • ACR Convergence Abstract Permissions & Reprints
  • PRSYM Abstract Policies

ACR Convergence. Where Rheumatology Meets

ACR Convergence 2026

Join us November 6-11 in Orlando, Florida.
See Registration Information

  • Contact ACR
  • Privacy Policy
  • ACR Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2026 American College of Rheumatology