ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1377

Mental Health Screening in Juvenile Myositis: Preliminary Analysis of a Multicenter Pilot Study

Kaveh Ardalan1, Lindsay Olson1, Jeffrey Dvergsten2, Ann Reed1, Alison Manning1, Gary Maslow1, Aruna Rikhi1, Brian Feldman3, ashley Danguecan4, Sarah Mossad4, Luana Flores Pereira4, Susan Shenoi5, Stacey Haynes5, Joanna Patten5 and Andrea Knight6, 1Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 2Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC, 3Division of Rheumatology, The Hospital for Sick Children; Child Health Evaluative Services, SickKids Research Institute; Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 4The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada, 5Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Center / University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 6The Hospital for Sick Children, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: dermatomyositis, mental health, Myositis, Pediatric rheumatology, psychosocial factors

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2022

Title: Pediatric Rheumatology – Clinical Poster II: Connective Tissue Disease

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: Qualitative studies in juvenile myositis (JM) suggest high rates of emotional distress but the prevalence of mental health comorbidities is not well described. We present the first multicenter North American study assessing acceptability of mental health screening, rates of positive mental health screening results, and associations of mental health with outcomes/health behaviors in JM.

Methods: JM patients/parents (5-21 yo) were eligible. Patient/parent-proxy mental health screeners included: Pediatric Symptom Checklist-17 (PSC-17), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9), and Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders (SCARED). Positive screening was defined as any total/domain score above established cutoffs. Patients/parents completed a 3-item mental health screening acceptability survey. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pediatric/parent-proxy Depressive Symptoms, Anxiety, Psychological Stress Experiences, and Positive Affect measures assessed emotional distress intensity. Outcomes/health behavior measures included: 1) Physician/Patient/Parent-proxy Global Assessments of Disease Activity (PGA, Pt/Par-GA); 2) PROMIS Mobility/Upper Extremity Function; 3) PROMIS Physical Activity; 4) medication adherence (Domains of Subjective Extent of Nonadherence [DOSE-NA]); 5) Measures of Sun Protection Practices. Mann-Whitney U test assessed positive vs negative screening group differences in the outcomes/health behavior measures. Spearman’s correlations for PROMIS measures of emotional distress and the outcomes/health behaviors were calculated.

Results: Data from 72 participants were analyzed. Most patients had dermatomyositis ( >90%) (Table 1). Most patients/parents respectively rated mental health screeners ‘a little/not at all’ difficult to complete (94.3%; 97%), and agreed screening should continue (94.3%; 94%) at least annually (88.6%; 95.5%). The majority screened positive on at least one mental health screening measure (n=51; 71%) (Table 2). Of patients who completed the PHQ-9, 20% scored ≥ 10, consistent with at least moderate depression symptoms. Positive screening was associated with higher PROMIS Depressive Symptoms, Anxiety, and Psychological Stress scores by patient (all p < 0.001) and parent-proxy report (p = 0.006, 0.003, 0.01 respectively) and lower patient PROMIS Positive Affect score (p = 0.025). Positive screening was not significantly associated with differences in outcomes/health behaviors. Correlational analysis showed associations between worse scores for PROMIS emotional distress measures and poorer physical function, worse medication nonadherence, and higher Par-GA score, though correlation coefficients were small in magnitude (Table 3).

Conclusion: JM patients/parents find routine mental health screening acceptable and necessary. High rates of positive screening suggest substantial psychosocial burden and worse mental health may correlate with poorer health outcomes/behaviors. Future studies should assess mental health longitudinally, evaluate mental health referral patterns, and further assess relationships to outcomes.

Supporting image 1

Table 1: Participant Descriptive Statistics

Supporting image 2

Table 2: Mental Health Measure Descriptive Statistics

Supporting image 3

Table 3: Spearman’s rho for PROMIS Mental Health Measures with Outcome Measures and Health Behaviors


Disclosures: K. Ardalan, None; L. Olson, None; J. Dvergsten, None; A. Reed, None; A. Manning, None; G. Maslow, None; A. Rikhi, None; B. Feldman, Pfizer, AB2-Bio, Janssen; a. Danguecan, None; S. Mossad, None; L. Flores Pereira, None; S. Shenoi, None; S. Haynes, None; J. Patten, None; A. Knight, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ardalan K, Olson L, Dvergsten J, Reed A, Manning A, Maslow G, Rikhi A, Feldman B, Danguecan a, Mossad S, Flores Pereira L, Shenoi S, Haynes S, Patten J, Knight A. Mental Health Screening in Juvenile Myositis: Preliminary Analysis of a Multicenter Pilot Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/mental-health-screening-in-juvenile-myositis-preliminary-analysis-of-a-multicenter-pilot-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/mental-health-screening-in-juvenile-myositis-preliminary-analysis-of-a-multicenter-pilot-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology