ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0254

Lipids and Vascular Inflammation in Patients with RA Using Triple Therapy vs Methotrexate + TNFi: A Secondary Analysis of the TARGET Randomized Active Comparator Trial

Katherine Liao1, Jon Giles2, Pamela Rist1, Robert Glynn1, Leah Santacroce1, Paul Ridker1, Ahmed Tawakol3, Joan Bathon2 and Daniel Solomon1, 1Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 2Columbia University, New York, NY, 3Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Cardiovascular, Inflammation, rheumatoid arthritis, TNF-blocking Antibody

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 12, 2022

Title: RA – Diagnosis, Manifestations, and Outcomes Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatments are known to cause complex changes in lipids, in part by controlling disease activity. While there are robust data on increases in cholesterol associated with biologic therapies, e.g., tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), there are limited data for triple therapy, methotrexate (MTX) + sulfasalazine + hydroxychloroquine. This study was carried out in the setting of the TARGET randomized active comparator trial that enrolled MTX inadequate responders with RA; all subjects underwent cardiovascular (CV) risk assessment with arterial FDG PET/CT at baseline and after 24 weeks. The objective of this study was to examine the changes in lipids pre/post-randomization to triple therapy or addition of TNFi. Further, we determined whether changes in lipid parameters differentially associated with CV risk as measured by arterial FDG PET/CT.

Methods: Subjects were randomly assigned to triple therapy or TNFi for 24 weeks. Baseline and follow-up measurements included disease activity score 28 (DAS28-CRP), lipid profile with total cholesterol (TC), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and triglycerides (TG). CV risk was assessed with FDG-PET/CT scans at baseline and follow-up for change in arterial inflammation, measured as an arterial target-to-background ratio (TBR) in the most diseased segment (MDS) of the carotid artery or aorta. We tested differences in lipid levels within each treatment group over the 24-week study using paired t-tests. Linear regression models were constructed to test for difference in change in lipids by treatment arm adjusted by age, sex, (model 1) and change in DAS28-CRP (model 2). The association between changes in lipid parameters and changes in MDS TBR were tested using linear regression with and without treatment group as a covariate in the model; all analyses were adjusted by age and sex.

Results: We studied 112 subjects, mean age 60 years, 71% female, 57% seropositive, mean RA duration 5 years. Within the group randomized to triple therapy (n = 55), an increase in HDL-C was observed, while an increase in TC was observed within the TNFi group (n =57) (Table 1). Only change in TG differed significantly by treatment arm. On average, subjects on triple therapy had a 23.6mg/dL greater reduction in TG between baseline and follow-up compared to the TNFi arm, adjusting for age, sex (p=0.01); this association remained independent after adjusting for change in disease activity (p=0.002) (Table 2). In both unadjusted and adjusted models, changes in lipid parameters were not significantly associated with change in MDS TBR (all associations between change in lipid and change in MDS TBR, p >0.40).

Conclusion: In the TARGET trial, we observed modest lipid changes within treatment groups. When comparing between treatment groups, subjects randomized to triple therapy experienced a greater reduction in TG compared to TNFi, independent of disease activity. While subjects in the two treatment groups had differential changes in lipids, this variation was not associated with differential longitudinal changes in CV risk as measured by arterial inflammation.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2


Disclosures: K. Liao, None; J. Giles, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, AbbVie/Abbott, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), Novartis, Gilead; P. Rist, American Heart Association; R. Glynn, Amarin, AstraZeneca, Kowa, Novartis, Pfizer; L. Santacroce, None; P. Ridker, Agepha, Amarin, AstraZeneca, Boeringer-Ingelheim, Civi Biopharm, Flame, Health Outlook, Horizon Therapeutics, Kowa, NHLBI, Novo Nordisk, Omeicos, Pfizer, Esperion, SOCAR, New Amsterdam Inc; A. Tawakol, Genentech, Lung Biotechnology, DalCor, Actelion; J. Bathon, None; D. Solomon, AbbVie/Abbott, Amgen, moderna, CorEvitas.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Liao K, Giles J, Rist P, Glynn R, Santacroce L, Ridker P, Tawakol A, Bathon J, Solomon D. Lipids and Vascular Inflammation in Patients with RA Using Triple Therapy vs Methotrexate + TNFi: A Secondary Analysis of the TARGET Randomized Active Comparator Trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/lipids-and-vascular-inflammation-in-patients-with-ra-using-triple-therapy-vs-methotrexate-tnfi-a-secondary-analysis-of-the-target-randomized-active-comparator-trial/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/lipids-and-vascular-inflammation-in-patients-with-ra-using-triple-therapy-vs-methotrexate-tnfi-a-secondary-analysis-of-the-target-randomized-active-comparator-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology