ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0471

Knowledge and Misconceptions About Contraception Among Individuals with Inflammatory Arthritis and Lupus-like Diseases

Caroline Siegel1, Medha Barbhaiya2, Lucy Masto1, Amaya Smole1, Bessie Stamm1, Jonah Levine1, Sarah Lieber2, Lisa Mandl2, Michael Lockshin2 and Lisa Sammaritano2, 1Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 2Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: autoimmune diseases, Cohort Study, education, patient, Surveys, Women's health

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 12, 2023

Title: (0460–0479) Reproductive Issues in Rheumatic Disorders Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Rheumatologists do not consistently provide contraceptive counseling for patients with systemic rheumatic disease (SRD). As contraception considerations may differ based on SRD, we compared contraception knowledge between individuals with reproductive capacity who have inflammatory arthritis (IA) or lupus-like diseases.

Methods: Women aged 18-65 years seen by a rheumatologist at our academic center ≥2 times from 2020-2022 were enrolled in the Rheumatology Women’s Reproductive Health and Wellness Cohort. This analysis included participants who completed a contraception knowledge assessment and self-reported IA or lupus-like disease. We excluded participants >50 years of age and those who self-reported menopause/premature ovarian failure, hysterectomy and/or oophorectomy, and/or infertility. We used descriptive statistics to compare the frequency of correct responses between participants with IA and lupus-like diseases.

Results: Of 812 cohort participants, 658 (81.0%) responded to contraception questions; 249 with reproductive capacity (mean age 36.3 ± 7.5 years; 99.2% self-reporting woman as gender identity) who self-reported IA (n=147) or lupus-like disease (n=102) were included in this analysis. Patients with IA vs. lupus-like diseases were more frequently White race (82.5% vs. 69.7%, p=0.04) and less frequently Hispanic/Latinx ethnicity (7.5% vs. 15.7%, p=0.04). 93.2% reported Bachelor’s degree or higher education level and 61.1% were married/partnered, with no differences between groups.

There were no differences in the frequency of correct responses about contraception effectiveness between patients with IA and lupus-like disease. Many participants overestimated the effectiveness of methods with low (1-10%) 1-year failure rates: 50.2% for depot medroxyprogesterone acetate [DMPA], 33.7% for estrogen-containing birth control pill [BCP], patch, or vaginal ring, and 28.1% for the progestin-only pill. In terms of methods with high (11-30%) 1-year failure rates, 66.7% overestimated effectiveness of barrier methods [Table 1].

Compared to individuals with IA, those with lupus-like disease more frequently responded “true” (i.e., correct response) that BCPs are contraindicated for women with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) (54.9% vs. 30.6%, p< 0.001). Participants with lupus-like disease vs. those with IA less frequently responded “false” (i.e., correct response) that BCPs (81.4% vs. 93.2%, p=0.004) and subdermal implants (82.4% vs. 91.2%, p=0.04) are contraindicated for women with any rheumatic disease [Table 2].

Conclusion: In a sample of highly educated individuals with reproductive capacity and IA or lupus-like disease, approximately half responded incorrectly about effectiveness of moderately/highly effective contraceptive methods. Compared to those with IA, more patients with lupus-like disease endorsed SRD-specific contraindications to BCPs: half correctly noted BCPs should not be taken by patients with aPL but one-fifth incorrectly noted BCPs should not be taken by anyone with SRD. Our results highlight important misconceptions about contraception that can inform patient education and counseling efforts.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2


Disclosures: C. Siegel: UCB, 12, fellowship training is supported by UCB Women's Health Fellowship Program; M. Barbhaiya: None; L. Masto: None; A. Smole: None; B. Stamm: None; J. Levine: None; S. Lieber: None; L. Mandl: Annals of Internal Medicine, 12, Associate Editor, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, 5, Up-to-Date, 9; M. Lockshin: None; L. Sammaritano: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Siegel C, Barbhaiya M, Masto L, Smole A, Stamm B, Levine J, Lieber S, Mandl L, Lockshin M, Sammaritano L. Knowledge and Misconceptions About Contraception Among Individuals with Inflammatory Arthritis and Lupus-like Diseases [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/knowledge-and-misconceptions-about-contraception-among-individuals-with-inflammatory-arthritis-and-lupus-like-diseases/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/knowledge-and-misconceptions-about-contraception-among-individuals-with-inflammatory-arthritis-and-lupus-like-diseases/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology