ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0679

Inhibition of TGFb3 in Systemic Sclerosis Patients Does Not Result in TGFb Pathway Modulation in Skin Biopsies or Circulation

Parisa Mazrooei, Xuting Rebecca Sheng, Xiaoyun Yang, Lyrialle Han, Samira Jamalian, Daniel Repplinger, Jingxuan He, Evelin Logis, Jeongsup Shim, Angela Hendricks, Lena Wang, Andrew Thorley and Sara Glickstein, Genentech/Roche, South San Francisco

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: cytokines, Fibroblasts, Dermal, signal transduction, Systemic sclerosis, Transforming Growth Factor (TGF)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: (0671–0710) Systemic Sclerosis & Related Disorders – Clinical Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: There are 3 isoforms of Transforming Growth Factor Beta (TGFb), a cytokine frequently upregulated in fibrosis. Chronic targeting of TGFb1 and TGFb2 for fibrotic conditions has historically been problematic due to toxicity. Monoclonal antibodies that selectively target the TGFb3 isoform offer a potential solution, aiming to reduce fibrosis by inhibiting the TGFb pathway with a more favorable safety profile. Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a debilitating disease where the TGFb pathway has been implicated as a disease driver. TGFb3 RNA correlated strongly with a 24-gene TGFb-responsive signature in SSc skin and also correlated with modified Rodnan skin score (Sun et al., 2024). Therefore, it was hypothesized that TGFb3 may be the main isoform involved in pathological fibrosis.

Methods: GA43360 is a Ph1b safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics study of SSc patients treated with 3 monthly doses of anti-TGFb3 (RO7303509). The study randomized 56 participants across three cohorts: Cohort A (75mg, n=12, and placebo, n=3), Cohort B (225mg, n=2, 360mg, n=15, and placebo, n=4), and Cohort C (1200mg, n=16, and placebo, n=4). To assess TGFb pathway modulation, we performed bulk RNAseq on patient skin biopsies collected pre- and post-anti-TGFb3 treatment and analyzed a 24-gene TGFb-responsive signature. Healthy control vendor-procured skin biopsies were also sequenced and analyzed for comparison. Indirect target engagement was assessed by measuring circulating TGFb3 protein levels in serum using the NULISA inflammation panel, and pathway modulation was evaluated by measuring serum periostin and COMP levels using immunoassays.

Results: Our drug was well tolerated at all doses, and the safety profile was acceptable. Pharmacokinetics for all doses were in agreement with model predictions and within the range of expected variability. We saw evidence of indirect target engagement through the upregulation of total TGFb3 levels in circulation post-dose with dose-dependent effects. We also observed higher levels of TGFb3 and TGFb pathway genes in SSc skin compared to healthy control skin, and elevations of periostin and COMP proteins in circulation. After 3 months of anti-TGFb3 treatment, we did not see modulation of TGFb pathway genes in the skin or circulation.

Conclusion: We demonstrated indirect target engagement but did not observe pathway modulation, suggesting that inhibition of TGFb3 alone is not sufficient for decreasing TGFb-driven pathway activation in SSc patients.


Disclosures: P. Mazrooei: Genentech, 3, 11; X. Sheng: Genentech, 3, 11; X. Yang: Genentech, 3; L. Han: Genentech, 3, 11; S. Jamalian: Genentech, 3, 11; D. Repplinger: Genentech, 3, 11; J. He: Genentech, 3, 11; E. Logis: Genentech, 3, 11; J. Shim: Genentech, 3, 11; A. Hendricks: Genentech, 3, 11; L. Wang: Genentech, 3, 11; A. Thorley: Genentech, 3, 11; S. Glickstein: Genentech, 3, 11.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Mazrooei P, Sheng X, Yang X, Han L, Jamalian S, Repplinger D, He J, Logis E, Shim J, Hendricks A, Wang L, Thorley A, Glickstein S. Inhibition of TGFb3 in Systemic Sclerosis Patients Does Not Result in TGFb Pathway Modulation in Skin Biopsies or Circulation [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/inhibition-of-tgfb3-in-systemic-sclerosis-patients-does-not-result-in-tgfb-pathway-modulation-in-skin-biopsies-or-circulation/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/inhibition-of-tgfb3-in-systemic-sclerosis-patients-does-not-result-in-tgfb-pathway-modulation-in-skin-biopsies-or-circulation/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology