ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1587

Improving Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in an Internal Medicine Resident Clinic: A Quality Improvement Initiative

Anna Falls1, Peta-Gay Ricketts1, Kelli Fox1, Teresa George1 and Chelsey Petz1, 1OhioHealth Riverside Methodist Hospital, Columbus, OH

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Cardiovascular, quality of care, rheumatoid arthritis, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2020

Title: Measures & Measurement of Healthcare Quality Poster

Session Type: Poster Session D

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Cardiovascular disease is one of the leading causes of death in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. Its risk in RA and SLE is comparable to that of diabetes. Observational studies show that RA patients frequently have unidentified and untreated risk factors due to gaps in screening. There are currently no guidelines in the United States on cardiovascular risk reduction for patients with autoimmune diseases. EULAR guidelines have suggested multiplying 10-year ACC/AHA atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk scores by 1.5. A 2015 study by Ozen et al. found that screening for 10-year ASCVD risk scores of >5% led to increased detection of subclinical atherosclerosis. Our aim is to increase the rate of annual lipid screening in RA and SLE patients at our resident clinic. We also aim to increase the use of statin therapy in patients with 10-year ASCVD risk scores ≥5%.

Methods: Baseline data was established by reviewing electronic medical records (EMRs) of patients with SLE and RA in the internal medicine resident clinic. Two plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles were performed over a four-month period. First, we developed a custom EMR note template for the resident rheumatology clinic that prompted residents to review lipid screening, calculate 10-year ASCVD risk score, determine if patients were on appropriate statin therapy, and notify the patient’s primary care provider as needed. We also provided resident education on ASCVD risk assessment and utilization of note template. Second, we adjusted the note template to prompt residents to notify clinic staff to schedule an office visit for cardiovascular risk assessment if indicated and provided additional resident education.

Results: We reviewed 79 patients in the pre-intervention period (73.4% RA, 20.3% SLE, 6.3% SLE and RA). Ninety-two percent of patients were ≥ 40 years old, 82% were female, and 41% had comorbid conditions of diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, or cerebrovascular accident.  After PDSA cycle 2, 88 patients with similar baseline characteristics were reviewed. Rates of documented lipid screening (92.4% vs 93.2%, p = 0.846) and annual lipid screening (62.0% vs 60.2%, p = 0.812) did not show improvement. The proportion of patients with 10-year ASCVD risk scores ≥ 5% on statin therapy in the current population (33.3% vs 57.9%, p = 0.038) showed improvement; a subgroup analysis of the original 79 patients (33.3% vs 58.3%, p = 0.038) also showed improvement.

Conclusion: In our clinic, there was a statistically significant increase in the proportion of patients on statin therapy with 10-year ASCVD risk scores ≥5% in the current and baseline populations. The rate of yearly lipid screening remained unchanged despite the use of a custom EMR template. Future PDSA cycles will focus on improving the rate of annual lipid screening.


Disclosure: A. Falls, None; P. Ricketts, None; K. Fox, None; T. George, None; C. Petz, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Falls A, Ricketts P, Fox K, George T, Petz C. Improving Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in an Internal Medicine Resident Clinic: A Quality Improvement Initiative [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/improving-cardiovascular-risk-assessment-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-and-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-in-an-internal-medicine-resident-clinic-a-quality-improvement-initiative/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/improving-cardiovascular-risk-assessment-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-and-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-in-an-internal-medicine-resident-clinic-a-quality-improvement-initiative/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology