ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0598

Impact of a Dedicated Lupus Nephritis Clinic to Improve Time to Biopsy and Care Quality

Shivani Garg1, Callie Plafkin2, Tripti Singh1, Sarah Panzer3 and Christie Bartels4, 1UW Madison, Madison, WI, 2UW Madison, Madison, 3UW-Madison, Madison, 4University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Madison, WI

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Access to care, Lupus nephritis, prevention, quality of care

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 7, 2020

Title: Health Services Research Poster

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Lupus nephritis (LN) contributes to a 10-fold higher risk to develop kidney failure and 26-fold higher mortality compared to peers. Kidney biopsy remains a gold-standard to diagnose LN and start therapy. Yet, our prior study highlighted that the average wait time to see a specialist and undergo a kidney biopsy was >50 days, with no change over 20 years (1997-2017). Further, studies report that high-impact quality process measures, such as ACE inhibitors use and addressing social needs, are often missed during routine SLE visits, contributing to poor LN outcomes. Therefore, we implemented a multidisciplinary LN clinic to provide targeted strategies to overcome such barriers to improve care and LN outcomes. We aimed to examine time to biopsy and quality measures provided to LN patients before and after the implementation of LN clinic.

Methods: All validated adult LN patients with diagnostic kidney biopsy preformed between 2011-2020 were identified from our comprehensive native kidney biopsy database at an academic center. Data on sociodemographic, disease characteristics and biopsy date were abstracted from this database. We manually abstracted data on medications, date of abnormal labs or LN specialist referral, vaccinations and social needs to examine quality process measures. Time to biopsy was defined as time from abnormal labs or LN specialist referral until biopsy. Pre- and post-LN clinic period included patients who underwent biopsies between 2011-2017 and 2018-2020, respectively. We used KM analysis to compare time to biopsy during the two periods, and Cox Proportional hazards models to examine predictors of time to biopsy. We used Fisher and two-sample t-tests to compare socio-demographics and quality measures during these two periods.

Results: The pre-LN clinic period included 53 LN patients, the mean age was 36 years, 75% were female and 74% were white (Table 1). During the post-LN clinic period, 21 LN patients underwent diagnostic biopsy. The mean age was 35.6 years, 62% were female and 51% were white.

The mean and median time to biopsy in the pre-LN clinic period were 202 and 26 (IQR 7-120) days, and during the post-LN clinic period were 22 and 16 (IQR 8-21) days. The median time to biopsy decreased by 10 days after starting the LN clinic (p 0.014; Figure 1). We found social barriers as the strongest predictor of longer wait times (HR 4.1, 95% CI 1.2-12, p 0.007; Table 2).

We found 13-fold higher odds of ACE inhibitors use in LN, 10-fold higher odds to complete pneumococcal vaccination, and 15-fold higher odds to address social needs during the post-LN clinic period compared to the previous period (Table 1). We noted a trend of increased hydroxychloroquine use in the post-LN clinic period.

Conclusion: This is one of the first studies to report significant improvement in wait times to diagnose LN after establishing a multidisciplinary LN clinic. Our study highlights that system and social barriers predict a delay in diagnosis, which can be addressed by including a social worker in specialized clinics. Finally, our study supports previous reports on higher quality measure performance in SLE subspecialty clinics.

Table 1. Demographics of Adult LN Patients During Pre- and Post-LN Clinic Periods

Figure 1. KM Plot: Time to Outpatient Biopsy Pre (2011-17) & Post (2018-20) LN Clinic

Table 2. Cox Proportional Hazards Model to Examine Predictors of Time to Biopsy


Disclosure: S. Garg, None; C. Plafkin, None; T. Singh, None; S. Panzer, None; C. Bartels, Independent Grants for Learning and Change (Pfizer), 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Garg S, Plafkin C, Singh T, Panzer S, Bartels C. Impact of a Dedicated Lupus Nephritis Clinic to Improve Time to Biopsy and Care Quality [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/impact-of-a-dedicated-lupus-nephritis-clinic-to-improve-time-to-biopsy-and-care-quality/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/impact-of-a-dedicated-lupus-nephritis-clinic-to-improve-time-to-biopsy-and-care-quality/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology