ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1176

Identifying Targets to Improve the Assessment of Psychosocial Risk Factors in Adolescent Patients: Perspectives from Pediatric Rheumatology Fellows in the United States and Canada

Jacob Spitznagle1, Nayimisha Balmuri1, Alexa Adams1, Karen Onel2, Sarah Taber1 and Nancy Pan1, 1Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 2Pediatric Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Education, gender, Pediatric rheumatology, primary care, psychosocial factors

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2020

Title: Pediatric Rheumatology – Clinical Poster II: Systemic JIA, Autoinflammatory, & Scleroderma

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Adolescent patients cared for in the pediatric rheumatology clinic balance challenges related to psychosocial stressors and physical growth with the complexities of living with a chronic medical condition. Due to the interplay between these factors, it is important that all providers for adolescent patients conduct appropriate psychosocial screenings to better identify at risk patients and address their unique healthcare needs. The HEADSS assessment (home, education/employment, activities, drugs, sexuality, suicide/depression) is a validated tool that provides a framework to comprehensively screen for psychosocial risk factors. The objective of this study was to identify targets to improve psychosocial screening of adolescent patients presenting to the pediatric rheumatology clinic by assessing current practice patterns and perceived barriers to screening by pediatric rheumatology fellows.

Methods: This is a descriptive survey-based study sent to active fellow-in-training members of the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA). Responders completed a secure web-based survey using REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) to assess current practices, beliefs, and barriers regarding the utilization of the HEADSS assessment.

Results: Of the 99 eligible CARRA fellow members, 57 responded (58%) and 53 completed the survey in its entirety. All but two responders are currently training in the United States, and the majority (81%) reported practicing in an urban setting. Sixty-one percent agreed or strongly agreed that a full comprehensive HEADSS assessment should be completed on all adolescent patients seen in the pediatric rheumatology clinic; however, only 38% reported often conducting a full HEADSS assessment on new adolescent patients, and 26% often conducted a full HEADSS assessment on established adolescent patients annually. Frequencies of conducting individual components of the HEADSS assessment are summarized in Figure 1. Of these, sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data were cited as being the least frequently collected information. Barriers to screening are summarized and ranked in Figure 2. The most commonly cited barriers to screening were lack of time and providers not knowing what to do with positive screens. Fifty-seven percent of responders cited interest in receiving additional training in application of the HEADSS assessment. Sixty-five percent cited interest in receiving additional training in collecting SOGI information.

Conclusion: Pediatric rheumatology fellows perceive the importance of assessing psychosocial risk factors in adolescent rheumatology patients but have difficulty completing a full assessment due to lack of time and uncertainty of what to do with a positive screen. In particular, fellows are least likely to ask patients about SOGI information. Potential strategies to overcome barriers include enhanced adolescent and LGBTQ health-related training for pediatric rheumatologists, standardized screening practices, and integration of multidisciplinary teams to develop an algorithm for referral services for positive screens.

Figure 1. Frequency of pediatric rheumatology fellows performing a full HEADSS assessment and individual components of the HEADSS assessment on adolescent patients. Components of the HEADSS assessment are ranked by mean Likert score for frequency (range 0-3), as well as the proportion of responses for each frequency rating (0 = never, 1 = sometimes, 2 = often, 3 = very often).

Figure 2. Barriers to performing a HEADSS assessment and collecting SOGI data as perceived by pediatric rheumatology fellows. Perceived barriers are ranked by mean Likert score for degree of perceived barrier (range 0-3), as well as the proportion of responses for each degree of perceived barrier rating (0 = not a barrier, 1 = minimal barrier, 2 = moderate barrier, 3 = severe barrier).


Disclosure: J. Spitznagle, None; N. Balmuri, None; A. Adams, None; K. Onel, None; S. Taber, None; N. Pan, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Spitznagle J, Balmuri N, Adams A, Onel K, Taber S, Pan N. Identifying Targets to Improve the Assessment of Psychosocial Risk Factors in Adolescent Patients: Perspectives from Pediatric Rheumatology Fellows in the United States and Canada [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/identifying-targets-to-improve-the-assessment-of-psychosocial-risk-factors-in-adolescent-patients-perspectives-from-pediatric-rheumatology-fellows-in-the-united-states-and-canada/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/identifying-targets-to-improve-the-assessment-of-psychosocial-risk-factors-in-adolescent-patients-perspectives-from-pediatric-rheumatology-fellows-in-the-united-states-and-canada/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology