ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2641

Identification of Systemic Sclerosis Intrinsic Subtypes in the ASSET Clinical Trial Using PBC Gene Expression

Zhiyun Gong1, Timothy Sullivan2, Tammara Wood3, David Fox4, Dinesh Khanna5 and Michael Whitfield6, 1Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, 2Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, 3Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, 4University of Michigan, Dexter, MI, 5University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 6Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Bioinformatics, Biomarkers, genomics, Scleroderma, Systemic, Systemic sclerosis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 18, 2024

Title: Abstracts: Systemic Sclerosis & Related Disorders – Clinical II

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 3:00PM-4:30PM

Background/Purpose: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is molecularly heterogeneous and distinct subtypes of patients have been identified based on gene expression in skin.  Although treatments have improved, clinical trials are still confounded by significant variability that may affect their interpretation and impact. Molecular signatures based on the gene expression in skin can divide samples into four reproducible molecular intrinsic subsets (inflammatory, fibroproliferative, limited, and normal-like). The purpose of this study was to develop a stratification method using easily accessible blood samples, based on methods we pioneered in skin, that can be used to identify the patients most likely to improve with a given treatment. We tested the hypothesis that molecular heterogeneity among gene expression in skin and blood will be concordant, which can be further aid in the precision medicine and improve our ability to predict treatment responses in SSc.

Methods: We analyzed PBC samples from 68 patients enrolled in the ASSET clinical trial by RNA-seq. Samples passing QC were prepared for ribodepleted RNA-seq using the Kapa RNA HyperPrep with RiboErase + Globin protocol with 100ng RNA as input. Completed libraries were sequenced on a NextSeq2000.  Data were processed using standard methods.  A binary classification model was trained for each subtype using the top genes in the corresponding ranked list of differentially expressed genes for each subset.

Results: RNA-seq data was generated for 68 baseline PBC samples.  We focused on the 64 patients in the ASSET study who had both skin and PBC RNA-Seq data available to train a supervised learning model. The true labels used in this study were subtypes assigned to the paired skin biopsy, which was taken at the same time as the blood draw.  Genes expressed in PBCs were ranked according to their correlation with each SSc intrinsic subtype predicted on their paired skin samples. A binary classification model was trained for each subtype using the top genes in the corresponding ranked list. Then, different integration methods were used to generate the final PBMC SSc intrinsic subtype prediction. We were able to achieve average accuracy around 85% using 70 genes for each SSc intrinsic subtype (Fig. 1A). By integrating results from the binary Support Vector Machine models using Max Difference method, the overall accuracy across the three subtypes was 87.5%. We further analyzed accuracy by subtype and find 83 – 88% accuracy for each individual subtype (Inflammatory: 0.83; Normal-like: 0.85; Fibroproliferative: 0.88; Fig 1B). These results confirmed our hypothesis that genes expressed in PBCs can be predictive of the SSc intrinsic subtypes originally found in the skin.

Conclusion: Our analyses using paired skin and PBC samples in untreated early SSc patients from the ASSET clinical trial show that we can predict the intrinsic molecular subsets from PBMC samples and should be validated in additional samples, including those on background immunosuppressive therapies. This provides optimism that we can use this more easily accessible tissue for subset prediction in clinical trials.

Supporting image 1

Figure 1. Biomarkers for subtype stratification in PBMC samples. A. Inflammatory biomarkers expressed in PBMCs. B. Normal-like biomarkers expression in PBMCs


Disclosures: Z. Gong: None; T. Sullivan: None; T. Wood: None; D. Fox: Abcon, 8, 10, 11; D. Khanna: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, Amgen, 2, AstraZeneca, 2, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, Cabaletta, 2, Certa Therapeutics, 2, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, Janssen, 2, MDI Therapeutics, 8, Merck/MSD, 2, Novartis, 2, Zura Bio, 2; M. Whitfield: Abbvie, 6, Boehringer Ingelheim, 1, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Celdara Medical, LLC, 5, 8, 9, 10, UCB Biopharma, 2, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Gong Z, Sullivan T, Wood T, Fox D, Khanna D, Whitfield M. Identification of Systemic Sclerosis Intrinsic Subtypes in the ASSET Clinical Trial Using PBC Gene Expression [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/identification-of-systemic-sclerosis-intrinsic-subtypes-in-the-asset-clinical-trial-using-pbc-gene-expression/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/identification-of-systemic-sclerosis-intrinsic-subtypes-in-the-asset-clinical-trial-using-pbc-gene-expression/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology