ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2213

Identification of a Diagnostic Model for Axial Spondyloarthritis in Daily Clinical Practice Using a Random Forest Machine Learning Approach

Imke Redeker1, Styliani Tsiami2, Jan Eicker3, Uta Kiltz4, David Kiefer2, Ioana Andreica5, Philipp Sewerin2 and Xenofon Baraliakos6, 1Ruhr Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany, 2Ruhr-Universität Bochum and Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Herne, Germany, 3Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet Herne and Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany, 4Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Herne, Germany, 5Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet Herne, Herne, Germany, 6Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS), Decision analysis, Diagnostic criteria, spondyloarthritis, Statistical methods

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 14, 2023

Title: (2195–2226) Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster III: SpA

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: In axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), early diagnosis plays a key role in preventing disease progression. However, a validated diagnostic algorithm does not exist, while classification criteria are frequently misused diagnostically.

This study aimed at identifying which decision model is being used for diagnosing patients with axSpA based on evaluations made in daily practice.

Methods: Complete clinical data of 399 patients who presented with chronic back pain in a specialized university clinic were retrospectively evaluated. All patients received complete rheumatologic examination. The total dataset was randomly split into training and test datasets at a 7/3 ratio. A model was built to classify patients into axSpA and non-axSpA based on the random forest algorithm, an ensemble machine learning technique which allows computing the importance of each variable in the statistical modelling process. The Mean Decrease Gini measure was used for the variable importance. The overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) in the test dataset were calculated.

Results: In total, 183 patients were diagnosed with axSpA and 216 with non-SpA (Table 1). In the test dataset, the model reached an accuracy of 0.9315, a sensitivity of 0.9634, a specificity of 0.8906, and an AUC of 0.9868 (Fig. 1A). HLA-B27 positivity, erosion on SIJ MRI, and elevated CRP played the most important role in the statistical modelling process followed by awakening at second half of night due to back pain and bone marrow edema and fat metaplasia on SIJ MRI (Fig. 1B).

Conclusion: Machine learning-based random forest classifier revealed a high performance in diagnosing patients with chronic back pain with axSpA and excluding patients with non-SpA using clinical, laboratory and imaging characteristics as evaluated in a daily practice scenario of a SpA-specialized clinic. External validation of the model is needed to investigate its clinical utility as a diagnostic decision support tool.

Supporting image 1

Table 1. Patient characteristics

Supporting image 2

Figure 1


Disclosures: I. Redeker: None; S. Tsiami: None; J. Eicker: None; U. Kiltz: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Amgen, 5, Biocad, 2, 6, Biogen, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, 5, Chugai, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, Fresenius, 5, Gilead, 2, 5, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), 5, Grünenthal, 2, 6, Hexal, 5, Janssen, 2, 6, MSD, 2, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, onkowiessen.de, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, Roche, 2, 6, UCB, 2, 6, Viatris, 2, 5; D. Kiefer: None; I. Andreica: AbbVie/Abbott, 1, 6, Amgen, 1, 6, AstraZeneca, 1, 6, Chugai, 6, Novartis, 1, 6, Sobi, 1, 6, UCB, 1, 6; P. Sewerin: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Biogen, 2, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 6, Celgene, 2, 5, 6, Chugai, 2, 5, 6, Hexal, 2, 6, Janssen-Cilag, 2, 5, 6, Lilly, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, Roche, 2, 6, Sanofi-Genzyme, 2, 6, Swedish Orphan Biovitrum, 2, 6, UCB, 2, 5, 6; X. Baraliakos: AbbVie, 2, 6, BMS, 2, 6, Chugai, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, Galapagos, 2, 6, Gilead, 2, 6, MSD, 2, 6, Novartis, 2, 6, Pfizer Inc, 2, 6, UCB, 2, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Redeker I, Tsiami S, Eicker J, Kiltz U, Kiefer D, Andreica I, Sewerin P, Baraliakos X. Identification of a Diagnostic Model for Axial Spondyloarthritis in Daily Clinical Practice Using a Random Forest Machine Learning Approach [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/identification-of-a-diagnostic-model-for-axial-spondyloarthritis-in-daily-clinical-practice-using-a-random-forest-machine-learning-approach/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/identification-of-a-diagnostic-model-for-axial-spondyloarthritis-in-daily-clinical-practice-using-a-random-forest-machine-learning-approach/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology