ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0149

How Stable Are Medication Necessity Beliefs and Safety Concerns in the First Year of RA?

Viviane Ta1, Orit Schieir2, Marie-France Valois3, Louis Bessette4, Gilles Boire5, Glen Hazlewood6, Carol Hitchon7, Edward Keystone8, Janet Pope9, Carter Thorne10, Diane Tin10, Nicole Andersen1, Vivian Bykerk11, Susan Bartlett3 and Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort (CATCH) Investigators12, 1McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort Study, Montreal, Canada, 3McGill University, Montreal, Canada, 4Laval University, Quebec, Canada, 5Universite de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada, 6University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada, 7University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada, 8The Rebecca MacDonald Centre for Arthritis, Mt. Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada, 9Department of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, St. Joseph's Health Centre, London, ON, Canada, 10Southlake Regional Health Centre, Newmarket, ON, Canada, 11Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 12Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort (CATCH) Study, Toronto, Canada

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Patient reported outcomes, prognostic factors, psychosocial factors, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Friday, November 6, 2020

Title: Patient Outcomes, Preferences, & Attitudes Poster I: RA, Spondyloarthritis, & OA

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: At RA onset, DMARDs are essential to controlling inflammation and preventing disability. In people with established RA, specific beliefs about the necessity of DMARDs and concerns about potential harm influence side effects and adherence. To examine how medication perceptions evolve over time, we evaluated the stability of RA medication beliefs around diagnosis and identified  predictors of change 12 months later.

Methods: Data were from Early RA patients enrolled in the Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort (CATCH) March 2017 and January 2020 who completed the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire at 0 and 12 months. Necessity and Concerns scales each have 5 statements regarding the need for prescribed medication to control RA and concerns about potential harms of taking them. We used Pearson correlation and multivariable regression to examine associations and predictors of change at 12 months.

Results: The 362 Participants were mostly women (66%), of white racial background (83%), with a mean (SD) age of 56 (15) years, and symptoms of 6 (3) months. Compared with baseline, at 12 months (n=180), mean Necessity beliefs were slightly higher (18.1 vs. 18.9;p=.01) and Concerns were slightly lower (15.2 vs. 14.3; p< .01).

At baseline, weak (r< 0.30) associations were evident between Necessity beliefs and minority status, CDAI, MTX use, and all HRQL domains except sleep. At 12 months, sleep, depression, and pain were positively though weakly related, and participation was inversely and weakly related to Necessity beliefs (Table 1). At baseline, worse CDAI, symptoms, function, and participation were associated with higher Concerns. These relationships were somewhat stronger at 12 months, except physical function was no longer associated with Concerns.

In multivariable regression, when starting treatment Necessity scores were lower in minorities and increased with CDAI, MTX use, and fatigue but decreased as sleep improved (Table 2). No relationships were evident at 12 months. Higher Concerns when starting treatment were predicted by higher education, and greater depression and anxiety. At 12 months, higher Concerns  were predicted by minority status and MTX use, higher emotional distress, better function and lower participation in social activities.  

Conclusion: Our data suggest that in people with early RA, there is an agreement that medicines are generally necessary, but also significant levels of concerns. Further, medication perceptions appear to be reasonably stable over the first year and are influenced to some degree by some individual characteristics and RA and medication experiences. Findings suggest that specific interventions may be needed to systematically influence medication beliefs and concerns to improve acceptance, tolerance, and long-term adherence.

Table 1. Associations between RA medicine necessity and concern beliefs, individual characteristics, and HRQL at baseline and 12 months in early RA.

Table 2. Predictors of medicine beliefs and concerns when starting first medications and change at 12 months in early RA.


Disclosure: V. Ta, None; O. Schieir, None; M. Valois, None; L. Bessette, Amgen, 1, 2, 3, BMS, 1, 2, 3, Janssen, 1, 2, 3, UCB, 1, 2, 3, AbbVie, 1, 2, 3, Pfizer, 1, 2, 3, Merck, 1, 2, 3, Celgene, 1, 2, 3, Sanofi, 1, 2, 3, Lilly, 1, 2, 3, Novartis, 1, 2, 3, Gilead, 2, 6, 8; G. Boire, Amgen, 1, 2, BMS, 1, 2, 3, Celgene, 1, Merck, 1, 2, Pfizer, 1, 2, 3, Eli Lilly, 1, 2, Janssen, 1, Abbvie, 1, Novartis, 1, Sandoz, 1; G. Hazlewood, None; C. Hitchon, None; E. Keystone, Abbot, 2, 5, 8, Amgen, 2, 5, 8, AstraZeneca, 2, 5, 8, Biotest, 2, 5, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, 8, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc., 2, 5, 8, Janssen, 2, 5, 8, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 5, 8, Genentech, 2, 5, 8, Merck, 2, 5, 8, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, Sanofi-Aventis, 2, 5, 8, UCB, 2, 5, 8; J. Pope, AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 5, 8, Lilly, 2, 5, 8, UCB, 2, 5, 8, Sanofi, 5, 8, Sandoz, 5, 8, Roche, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, Merck, 2, 5, 8, Janssen, 5, 8, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 2, 5, BMS, 2, 5, 8, Abbott, 5, Actelion, 5, AstraZeneca, 5, Bayer, 5, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, EICOS, 5, Emerald, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 5, Medexus, 5, Seattle Genetics, 2; C. Thorne, Abbvie, 1, 2, Amgen, 1, 2, Celgene, 1, 2, CaREBiodam, 1, Centocor, 1, Janssen, 1, Lilly, 1, Medexus/Medac, 1, 2, Merck, 1, Novartis, 1, 2, Pfizer, 1, 2, Sanofi, 1; D. Tin, None; N. Andersen, None; V. Bykerk, Amgen, 2, 5, UCB, 5, National Institute of Health, 2, 9, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, 2, 5, Gilead, 5, Pfizer, 5, Brainstorm Therapeutics, 1, 3; S. Bartlett, Pfizer, 1, UCB, 1, Lily, 1, Novartis, 1, Merck, 1, Janssen, 1, Abbvie, 1; C. (CATCH) Investigators, Amgen, 2, Pfizer Canada, 2, Medexus Inc., 2, Eli Lilly Canada, 2, Merck Canada, 2, Sandoz Canada, Biopharmaceuticals, 2, Gilead Sciences Canada, 2, Hoffmann-LaRoche, 2, Janssen Biotech, 2, UCB Canada, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada, 2, Sanofi Genzyme, 2, AbbVie Corporation, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ta V, Schieir O, Valois M, Bessette L, Boire G, Hazlewood G, Hitchon C, Keystone E, Pope J, Thorne C, Tin D, Andersen N, Bykerk V, Bartlett S, (CATCH) Investigators C. How Stable Are Medication Necessity Beliefs and Safety Concerns in the First Year of RA? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/how-stable-are-medication-necessity-beliefs-and-safety-concerns-in-the-first-year-of-ra/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/how-stable-are-medication-necessity-beliefs-and-safety-concerns-in-the-first-year-of-ra/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology