ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1288

How Often Do We Provide Relevant and Patient Centric Discharge Instructions in Rheumatology? A Single Academic Center Clinic Experience

Dijo Joseph1, Asha Asthana2, Sobia Hassan3 and Meenakshi Jolly3, 1Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, 2Rush University Medical Center Department of Internal Medicine, Chicago, IL, 3Rush University, Chicago, IL

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Access to care, education, patient, quality of care

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2022

Title: Measures and Measurement of Healthcare Quality Poster

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: Post-visit discharge instructions (DCI) are an important supplement to the patient visit that serves to reinforce a patient’s understanding of their diagnosis, medications and treatment plan. They empower patients, improve compliance, and promote health literacy. DCI are especially important in the care of rheumatology patients given the chronic nature of rheumatologic diseases, co-morbidities and the side effect profiles of rheumatologic medications. As one-third of US adults have limited health literacy, it is important that DCI are easy to read and comprehend. The American Medical Association and the National Institute of Health have recommended that medical information be written at a 6th grade level. We aimed to assess the prevalence, quality, and appropriateness of DCI in an outpatient academic rheumatology clinic.

Methods: This retrospective chart review assessed all Rheumatology clinic appointments of patients ≥18 years from October 1-8, 2021. Data collected included: demographics, rheumatologic diagnoses, medications, co-morbidities, presence of DCI (Yes/No), readability of DCI (Flesch-Kincaid scores), presence of pertinent information within DCI (diagnosis, medications, management plan), type of clinic (Trainee or not) and the patients documented preferences for learning. Rheumatologic medications were stratified into 4 tiers based on their side effect profile, need for monitoring, and infection risk (Highest tier denoted greatest risk).

Results: Overall 82/316 patients (25.9%) received a DCI. Of the 210 (66.5%) patients with some change in management, 76 (36.1%) received DCI. Majority were provided free text instructions (80%), followed by educational resource (15.9%), and both (3.7%) (Table 1). Of the patients that received DCI, 74.2% of the instructions were concordant with the changes outlined in the providers note. The most concordant category was medication changes while the least concordant was relevant disease education. The median Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level of DCI was 6.8. (Table 2). Higher frequency of DCI use was noted with a change in management (p< 0.001), new patient visit (p 0.002), and medical trainee/teaching clinic (p 0.007). There were no differences in DCI frequency based on primary language, type of rheumatologic condition, presence of 3rd/4th tier or number of medications, comorbidities, or learning preferences/barriers. (Table 3).

Conclusion: DCI are underutilized in the rheumatology clinic. Surprisingly, patients at higher risk for worse outcomes (e.g. more comorbidities, higher number/and tier of medications used) did not translate to a greater use of DCI. When provided, DCI were at 7th grade reading level. Learning preferences and barriers while documented, were not considered when providing DCI. With the practice gaps identified, future studies to implement simple and standardized DCI is planned.

Supporting image 1

* Charlson Comorbidity Index provides a 10 year mortality for patients with a range of comorbid conditions
** Tiers of medications based on side effects, drug monitoring, and infection risk with higher tiers conferring higher risk
*** Learning modalities recorded in RUMC Rheumatology Clinic electronic medical record

Supporting image 2

* Only applicable to Flesch-Kincaid Readability and Grade Level
** These 3 categories were identified by the investigators from the providers note and then compared to the DCI
*** Flesch-Kincaid tests are readability assessments that are widely used to evaluate the reading ease and grade level of a given text. The higher the reading ease score the easier the text is to understand.

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: D. Joseph, None; A. Asthana, None; S. Hassan, None; M. Jolly, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Joseph D, Asthana A, Hassan S, Jolly M. How Often Do We Provide Relevant and Patient Centric Discharge Instructions in Rheumatology? A Single Academic Center Clinic Experience [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/how-often-do-we-provide-relevant-and-patient-centric-discharge-instructions-in-rheumatology-a-single-academic-center-clinic-experience/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/how-often-do-we-provide-relevant-and-patient-centric-discharge-instructions-in-rheumatology-a-single-academic-center-clinic-experience/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology