ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 111

Focused Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Teaching: Effect on Medical Students’ Physical Examination Skills

Bhavna Seth1, Lorraine Stanfield2 and Eugene Y. Kissin3, 1Internal Medicine, Boston Univeristy Medical Center, Boston, MA, 2Internal Medicine, Boston Univeristy, Boston, MA, 3Boston University, Boston, MA

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Education, Examination, medical, trainee and ultrasonography

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: Education Poster

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Musculoskeletal ultrasound provides instant feedback for spatial understanding and the evaluation of abnormalities with great precision and accuracy, and may aid in developing physical examination skills.

Methods:

We framed a teaching exercise to develop examination skills in medical students using ultrasound imaging as an aid in order to assess ultrasound utility in improving these skills. Of 158 second year medical students, 63 volunteered to participate in a 2-day musculoskeletal exercise. Students who were not able to commit to both days were excluded. On day one, all students were taught examination of the knee and shoulder in 1 hour. We randomized 24 students for inclusion of ultrasound demonstration of key joint landmarks (Ultrasound aided group-USG) within the same 1hr period.

Student performance was evaluated in a 20-minute OSCE on day 2 with standardized patients. Students were graded by an observer blinded to instruction group using a standardized checklist, that included key inspection, palpation, and maneuvers for joint exams.   The study was exempted from review by the local IRB. Participant confidentiality was maintained with anonymized codes. The Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test was used to analyze the results given the small sample and non-normal distribution of the scores.

Results:

The maximum score for knee and shoulder examinations were 14 and 15 respectively. For the knee examination, the mean score of the USG (10.38±2.35) was significantly higher than the non-USG group (8.95±2.14) p=0.013. There was a non-significant trend towards improved performance of shoulder examination in the USG (12.58±1.82) compared to non-USG (11.59±2.49) group (p=0.11).

Since ultrasound visualization is more likely to improved inspection and palpation components, we analyzed them separately. For knee examination, the USG group fared significantly better (7.5±1.72 vs. 6.10±1.67, p=0.003); a similar trend towards improved performance in the shoulder examination, did not reach significance in the USG group (4.96±0.99 vs. 4.49±1.12, p=0.075).

In sub-components of the knee exam, significant improvement was seen in the USG-aided group in palpation of the lateral collateral ligament (p=0.016), popliteal space for Baker’s cysts (p=0.017), and the patellofemoral shrug test (p=0.004). For sub-components of the shoulder exam, improvement was significant in the USG-aided group for shoulder inspection (p=0.043), palpation of the sternoclavicular joint (p=0.008), acromioclavicular joint (p=0.043), and shoulder range of motion (p=0.045).

Conclusion:

Incorporation of ultrasound into musculoskeletal exam curriculum demonstrated short-term improvement in knee examination performance, with a trend toward improvement in shoulder exam in second-year medical students.

Table: Knee and Shoulder Exam- ultrasound vs. non-ultrasound group scores

 


Disclosure: B. Seth, None; L. Stanfield, None; E. Y. Kissin, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Seth B, Stanfield L, Kissin EY. Focused Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Teaching: Effect on Medical Students’ Physical Examination Skills [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/focused-musculoskeletal-ultrasound-teaching-effect-on-medical-students-physical-examination-skills/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/focused-musculoskeletal-ultrasound-teaching-effect-on-medical-students-physical-examination-skills/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology