ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1180

External Validation of a Multi-biomarker-Based Cardiovascular Disease Risk Prediction Score for Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients

Jeffrey R Curtis1, Eric Sasso2, Elena Hitraya2, Cheryl Chin3, Richard Bamford3, Rotem Ben-Shachar3, Alexander Gutin3, Darl Flake3, Brent Mabey3 and Jerry Lanchbury3, 1Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 2Myriad Autoimmune, South San Francisco, CA, 3Myriad Genetics, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Biomarkers, Cardiovascular, Disease Activity, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2020

Title: RA – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster III: Cardiopulmonary Aspects

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: A novel score for predicting 3-year risk for CVD events in RA patients combines age, four traditional CVD risk factors (diabetes, hypertension, smoking, history of high-risk CVD event), a personalized assessment of RA-related inflammation based on the multi-biomarker disease activity (MBDA) score and, individually, 3 of its 12 biomarkers, TNF-R1, MMP-3 and leptin (log-transformed). This score was developed and internally validated using patient data from the Medicare database. The purpose of this analysis was to externally validate the MBDA-based CVD risk prediction score in a younger cohort from the Symphony claims database.

Methods: A cohort of patients ≥18 years old with RA diagnosis from a rheumatologist and evidence of an RA-specific treatment, excluding patients with malignancy, past myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke, was created by a third party (Symphony) by matching medical and pharmaceutical claims and linking them to MBDA scores from a database of tests done for routine care. Medicare patients were excluded to avoid overlap with the internal validation cohort. Only the first MBDA test was used for each patient. The study endpoint was time from MBDA testing to first CVD event within a 3-year time horizon. CVD event was defined as MI or stroke, based on ICD-9 or ICD-10 diagnosis codes in hospital claims. Analyses focused on relative risk, not absolute risk, because CVD event data in Symphony may be incomplete. A univariate Cox proportional hazards regression model was fit with the MBDA-based CVD risk score as the sole predictor of time to CVD event to obtain a hazard ratio (HR) estimate (95% CI) and p-values from a likelihood ratio test (LRT). Sensitivity analyses determined HR for patient subgroups, with p-values determined for the interaction between subgroups and the MBDA-based CVD risk score. Using a multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression model, the MBDA-based CVD risk score was compared to a simpler model that included only age, sex, diabetes, hypertension, history of other CVD, smoking and CRP (log-transformed) for ability to predict time to a CVD event.

Results: 48,868 patients with 337 CVD events met eligibility criteria and had linked biomarker data. Mean age was 54.4 years. 81.7% were female (Table 1). Mean follow-up was 24.4 months. The MBDA-based CVD risk score (mean 3.3, IQR 2.8–3.8) was highly significant in univariate analysis, with HR = 3.99 (95% CI: 3.52-4.51, p = 4.4×10-95); i.e., for every 1-unit increase in risk score, the CVD event rate in this cohort was ~4 times as high. Similar results were seen in the subset of 44,379 patients < 65 years old, with HR=4.26 (95% CI: 3.53-5.14, p = 1.2×10-47). In sensitivity analyses, after adjusting for multiple comparisons, there were no significant differences between HR of complementary subgroups (Figure 1). The MBDA-based CVD risk score added significant prognostic information to a simpler, clinical model (HR=2.28 [95% CI: 1.69-3.08, p = 1.6×10-7] after accounting for all other factors).

Conclusion: The MBDA-based CVD risk prediction score has been externally validated in a cohort that is younger than and independent of the Medicare cohort used previously for test development and internal validation.

Table 1. Cohort characteristics of RA patients with linked biomarker data and at risk for CVD events.

Figure 1. Hazard ratios for CVD event over 3 years in the external validation dataset (N=48,868). Vertical dashed line indicates the hazard ratio for all patients.


Disclosure: J. Curtis, AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Corrona, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, Lilly, 2, 5, Myriad, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Regeneron, 2, 5, Roche, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 5, Sanofi, 5; E. Sasso, Myriad Genetics, Inc., 1, 3; E. Hitraya, Myriad Genetics, Inc., 1, 3; C. Chin, Myriad Genetics, Inc., 1, 3; R. Bamford, Myriad Genetics, Inc., 1, 3; R. Ben-Shachar, Myriad Genetics, Inc., 1, 3; A. Gutin, Myriad Genetics, Inc., 1, 3; D. Flake, Myriad Genetics, Inc., 1, 3; B. Mabey, Myriad Genetics, Inc., 1, 3; J. Lanchbury, Myriad Genetics, Inc., 1, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Curtis J, Sasso E, Hitraya E, Chin C, Bamford R, Ben-Shachar R, Gutin A, Flake D, Mabey B, Lanchbury J. External Validation of a Multi-biomarker-Based Cardiovascular Disease Risk Prediction Score for Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/external-validation-of-a-multi-biomarker-based-cardiovascular-disease-risk-prediction-score-for-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/external-validation-of-a-multi-biomarker-based-cardiovascular-disease-risk-prediction-score-for-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology