ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1204

Experience Matters in Ultrasound Assessment of Gout

Burak Elkiran1 and Eugene Y. Kissin2, 1Internal Medicine, Steward Carney Hospital, Boston, MA, 2Rheumatology, Boston University, Boston, MA

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Education, gout, OA, ultrasonography and ultrasound

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 22, 2018

Title: Imaging of Rheumatic Diseases Poster II: Ultrasound

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Ultrasound has emerged in the field of rheumatology as a diagnostic aid for gout
and other similar forms of arthritis. While a number of studies have looked into the test characteristics of
ultrasound in diagnosing gout, only a few studies have examined the correlation between user experience
with soft tissue ultrasound and diagnostic precision. Our study seeks to examine the correlation between
the diagnostic accuracy of clinicians for gout using ultrasound and factors pertaining to experience and
training.
Methods: Graduates of a MSUS (musculoskeletal ultrasound) training program were asked to
anonymously complete a set of multiple-choice questions (single best answer type) asking for the most
likely patient diagnosis based on de-identified ultrasound images of bilateral knee and 1st
metatarsophalangeal joints from patients with non-tophaceous, crystal proven gout (n=6), crystal proven
calcium pyrophosphate arthropathy (n=5), or synovial fluid and radiograph supported osteoarthritis (n=2).
No normal images were included in the questionnaires. They were also asked information regarding the
use of MSUS within the participant’s practice/fellowship, years in practice, MSUS CME (Continuing
Medical Education) scores. Participants were categorized into quartile groups based upon prior final exam
scores. We used Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test and Spearman's Rank Correlation Co-efficient methods for
the statistical analysis.
Results: Survey was sent to 240 clinicians, 32 graduates responded to the survey, 10 of which did not
answer demographic questions. Clinicians with 5 or more years of practice had more correct answers in
gout questions than the ones who practice less than 5 years (76% accurate answers in gout questions vs
54%, p<0.05; r=0.54). They also had more correct answers in overall questions including gout, pseudo-
gout and OA compared to the clinicians who practice for less than 5 years, however this was not clinically
significant (64% accurate answers in overall questions vs 52%, p= 0.08; r=0.32). Differences in gout
diagnosis accuracy based on CME credits was not statistically significant (p= 0.2). There was no
correlation found between general MSUS training exam scores and accuracy in diagnosing gout.

Conclusion: This is the first study which shows how the length of time in practice affects the accuracy in
diagnosing gout, and that this effect is more significant that extent of CME hours or MSUS training exam
performance. However, it should be noted that the training exam performance was not specific to gout.

Disclosure: B. Elkiran, None; E. Y. Kissin, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Elkiran B, Kissin EY. Experience Matters in Ultrasound Assessment of Gout [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/experience-matters-in-ultrasound-assessment-of-gout/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/experience-matters-in-ultrasound-assessment-of-gout/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology