ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1124

Examining the Relationships Between Treatment and Pain and Physical Function Outcomes in Patients with Osteoarthritis: A Mediation Modeling Approach

Lucy Abraham1, Robert Dworkin2, Dennis C. Turk3, John D. Markman2, David A. Williams4, Andrew G Bushmakin5, Jerry A. Hall6, David C. Semel7, Joseph C Cappelleri5 and Ruoyong Yang8, 1Pfizer Ltd., Tadworth, United Kingdom, 2University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, 3University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 4University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 5Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT, 6Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 7Pfizer, New York, NY, 8Pfizer Inc., New York, NY

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Mediation Model, Osteoarthritis, pain, physical function, treatment

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 8, 2021

Title: Osteoarthritis – Clinical Poster III (1118–1134)

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: To better understand the complex relationships between treatment and pain and physical function (PF) outcomes, we investigated a set of mediation models of osteoarthritis (OA) patients’ responses to tanezumab, an antibody against nerve growth factor that is in development for the treatment of OA.

Methods: Data came from two randomized clinical trials of tanezumab (Study 1: NCT02697773, JAMA. 2019;322:37-48 and Study 2: NCT02709486, Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79:800-810); in both trials tanezumab provided greater pain relief and improvements in PF than placebo in patients with OA (all patients satisfied the American College of Rheumatology criteria for OA). A set of mediation models was used to explore the interrelationships among treatment, PF as measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC*) PF scores, and pain (WOMAC Pain scores) as a mediator of the effect of treatment on PF: (a) cross-sectional mediation models, (b) longitudinal mediation models, and (c) pseudo steady-state longitudinal mediation models. The cross-sectional mediation models include the following variables: treatment (tanezumab vs placebo), pain and PF scores (models were assessed separately at weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, or 24). The longitudinal mediation models estimate relationships using data from all weeks simultaneously and include treatment, pain and PF scores at weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24. The longitudinal steady-state mediation model also uses all available data at weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 with the assumption that relationships among variables in the model are the same at all time points.

*© 1996 Nicholas Bellamy. WOMAC® is a registered trademark of Nicholas Bellamy (CDN, EU, USA).

Results: The results of the cross-sectional and longitudinal mediation models showed that the indirect effect of treatment through pain on PF was stable across time (cross-sectional: 78.8–95.1%, all P< 0.0001; longitudinal: 70.5–86.6%, all P< 0.0001), indicating that a pseudo steady-state model is appropriate. The results of the longitudinal steady-state mediation models showed that the indirect effect of the treatment on PF was 77.8% in Study 1 and 74.1% in Study 2 (P< 0.0001, respectively), while the direct effect of the treatment on PF was 22.2% for Study 1 (P=0.0003) and 25.9% for Study 2 (P=0.0019) (Figure).

Conclusion: At least 75% of the treatment effect of tanezumab on physical functioning can be explained by the improvements in pain. However, tanezumab has an additional effect on physical functioning (approximately 25%), which is independent of improvements in pain. Research is needed to explain this effect and evaluate additional mediators (e.g., sleep, fatigue, method variance) that may contribute to the observed direct effect.


Disclosures: L. Abraham, Pfizer, 3, 11; R. Dworkin, Abide, 1, 2, Acadia, 1, 2, Adynxx, 1, 2, Analgesic Solutions, 1, 2, Aptinyx, 1, 2, Aquinox, 1, 2, Asahi Kasei, 1, 2, Astellas, 1, 2, AstraZeneca, 1, 2, Biogen, 1, 2, Biohaven, 1, 2, Boston Scientific, 1, 2, Braeburn, 1, 2, Cardialen, 1, 2, Celgene, 1, 2, Centrexion, 1, 2, Chromocell, 1, 2, Clexio, 1, 2, Collegium, 1, 2, Concert, 1, 2, Confo, 1, 2, Decibel, 1, 2, Dong-A, 1, 2, Editas, 1, 2, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 2, Ethismos, 1, 2, Eupraxia, 1, 2, Glenmark, 1, 2, Gloriana, 1, 2, Grace, 1, 2, Hope, 1, 2, Immune, 1, 2, Lotus, 1, 2, Mainstay, 1, 2, Merck, 1, 2, Neumentum, 1, 2, Neurana, 1, 2, NeuroBo, 1, 2, Novaremed, 1, 2, Novartis, 1, 2, Olatec, 1, 2, OliPass, 1, 2, Pfizer, 1, 2, Phosphagenics, 1, 2, Quark, 1, 2, Reckitt Benckiser, 1, 2, Regenacy, 1, 2, Relmada, 1, 2, Sangamo, 1, 2, Sanifit, 1, 2, Scilex, 1, 2, Semnur, 1, 2, SIMR Bio, 1, 2, SK Life Sciences, 1, 2, Sollis, 1, 2, SPRIM, 1, 2, Teva, 1, 2, Theranexus, 1, 2, Trevena, 1, 2, Vertex, 1, 2, Vizuri, 1, 2; D. Turk, AccelRx, 2, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, Flexion, 2, GlaxoSmithKline, 2, Pfizer, 2; J. Markman, Trigemina, 2, Editas Medicine, 2, Plasma Surgical, 1, 2, Novartis, 1, 12, Data safety monitoring board, Allergan, 1, 12, Data safety monitoring board, Clexio Biosciences, 1, Flexion Therapeutics, 1, Quark Pharmaceuticals, 1, Quartet Medicine, 1, Collegium Pharmaceutical, 1, Purdue Pharma, 1, Biogen, 1, Aptinyx, 1, Nektar, 1, Grünenthal, 1, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, Depomed, 1, Janssen, 1, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, 1, KemPharm, 1, Abbott Laboratories, 1, Chromocell, 1, Convergence Pharmaceuticals, 1, Inspirion, 1, Pfizer, 1, Sanofi, 1, Daiichi Sankyo, 1, Trevena, 1; D. Williams, Swing Therapeutics, Inc, 2, Community Health Focus Inc, 2; A. Bushmakin, Pfizer Inc, 3, 11; J. Hall, Eli Lilly & Co, 3, 11; D. Semel, Pfizer, 3, 11; J. Cappelleri, Pfizer Inc, 3, 11; R. Yang, Pfizer Inc., 3, 8, 11.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Abraham L, Dworkin R, Turk D, Markman J, Williams D, Bushmakin A, Hall J, Semel D, Cappelleri J, Yang R. Examining the Relationships Between Treatment and Pain and Physical Function Outcomes in Patients with Osteoarthritis: A Mediation Modeling Approach [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/examining-the-relationships-between-treatment-and-pain-and-physical-function-outcomes-in-patients-with-osteoarthritis-a-mediation-modeling-approach/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/examining-the-relationships-between-treatment-and-pain-and-physical-function-outcomes-in-patients-with-osteoarthritis-a-mediation-modeling-approach/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology