ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: LB11

Efficacy and Safety of Telitacicept in Patients with Sjögren’s Disease: Results from a Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 3 Clinical Study

Dong Xu1, Shangzhu Zhang1, Lin Qiao1, Li Zhang1, Wenxiang Wang2, Lin Li2, Binghua Xiao2, Jing Zhang2, Qing Zuraw3, Jianmin Fang2 and Xiaofeng Zeng1, 1Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College; National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases (NCRC-DID), Ministry of Science & Technology; State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases; Key Laboratory of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China (People's Republic), 2RemeGen Co., Ltd., Rheumatology, Yantai, China (People's Republic), 3Vor Biopharma Inc., Boston

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Date of first publication: October 13, 2025

Keywords: autoimmune diseases, B-Lymphocyte, Biologicals, Late-Breaking 2025, Sjögren's syndrome

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2025

Title: (LB01–LB18) Late-Breaking Posters

Session Type: Poster Session

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Sjögren’s disease (SjD) is a chronic autoimmune disease whose pathogenesis is associated with aberrant activation of B-lymphocytes. Telitacicept, a novel fusion protein, dually targets and neutralizes B-lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS) and a proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL), and has previously demonstrated efficacy and safety in a phase 2 study in patients with SjD.

Methods: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study (NCT05673993) was conducted in 79 research centers in China. Participants aged 18–70 years meeting the 2016 ACR/EULAR criteria for SjD who were anti-SSA antibody positive with EULAR Sjögren’s Syndrome Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI)≥5 were eligible. Eligible participants were randomized (1:1:1) to telitacicept 160 mg, telitacicept 80 mg, or placebo groups to receive weekly subcutaneous injection for 48 weeks. During the period from Week 24–48, participants with inadequate response to treatment in the placebo group could switch to telitacicept 160 mg or telitacicept 80 mg at a ratio of 1:1 under blind conditions. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline in ESSDAI score at Week 24. Secondary endpoints included change from baseline in ESSDAI score at Week 48; proportion of participants with: ≥3-point reduction from baseline in ESSDAI score; ESSDAI score < 5; ≥1-point or ≥15% reduction from baseline in EULAR Sjögren’s Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI); and change from baseline in ESSPRI total score (all at Week 24 and Week 48). The proportion of Sjögren's Tool for Assessing Response (STAR) responders was also assessed, along with adverse events (AEs) and immunological parameters.

Results: A total of 381 eligible participants were randomly assigned to telitacicept 160 mg (N&#3f127), telitacicept 80 mg (N&#3f127), and placebo (N&#3f127). One participant in the telitacicept 80 mg group who prematurely withdrew before receiving study treatment was excluded from the estimand population and safety set. Compared with placebo, a statistically significant decrease in ESSDAI score from baseline at Week 24 was observed with telitacicept 160 mg (least square [LS] mean change: -4.4 vs -0.6, p < 0.0001) and telitacicept 80 mg (LS mean change: -3.0 vs -0.6, p < 0.0001) (Table 1). The efficacy in both telitacicept groups was maintained through Week 48 compared with placebo, with telitacicept 160 mg having a better reduction than 80 mg at Week 48 (LS mean change: -4.6 vs -3.2) (Figure 1a). Other efficacy endpoints, including proportion of participants who achieved ≥3-point reduction in ESSDAI score, proportion of participants with ESSDAI score < 5, proportion of participants who achieved ≥1-point or ≥15% reduction in ESSPRI score, change from baseline in ESSPRI score, and proportion of participants who achieved STAR response, showed consistent results with the primary endpoint (Table 1 and Figure 1). The majority of treatment-emergent AEs were mild or moderate (Table 2).

Conclusion: The primary efficacy endpoint was reached in this study. Compared with placebo, both telitacicept 160 mg and 80 mg demonstrated consistent clinical symptom improvement through 48 weeks and a favorable safety profile, with greater improvements observed with the telitacicept 160 mg dose.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: D. Xu: None; S. Zhang: None; L. Qiao: None; L. Zhang: None; W. Wang: RemeGen Co., Ltd, 3; L. Li: RemeGen Co., Ltd, 3; B. Xiao: RemeGen Co., Ltd., 3; J. Zhang: RemeGen Co., Ltd, 3; Q. Zuraw: RemeGen Co., Ltd., 11, VorBio, 3, 4, 11; J. Fang: RemeGen Co., Ltd., 3, 11; X. Zeng: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Xu D, Zhang S, Qiao L, Zhang L, Wang W, Li L, Xiao B, Zhang J, Zuraw Q, Fang J, Zeng X. Efficacy and Safety of Telitacicept in Patients with Sjögren’s Disease: Results from a Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 3 Clinical Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-telitacicept-in-patients-with-sjogrens-disease-results-from-a-multicenter-randomized-double-blind-placebo-controlled-phase-3-clinical-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-telitacicept-in-patients-with-sjogrens-disease-results-from-a-multicenter-randomized-double-blind-placebo-controlled-phase-3-clinical-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology