ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1129

Effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors and urate-lowering agents in patients with gout: data from a single-center specialised clinic

Jose Doménech Serrano1, Ivana García Loiseau2, Cristina RodrÍguez-Alvear3, Pablo Riesgo Sanchis1, Oscar Moreno Pérez1 and Mariano Andrés1, 1Dr Balmis Alicante General University Hospital-ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain, 2Miguel Hernández University, Alicante, Spain, 3Virgen de la Peña General Hospital, Fuerteventura, Spain

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: comparative effectiveness, gout, hyperuricemia, Uric Acid, Urate

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 27, 2025

Title: (1123–1146) Metabolic & Crystal Arthropathies – Basic & Clinical Science Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors (SGLT2I) proved substantial benefits in diabetes mellitus (DM), heart failure (HF) and kidney disease (KD). In pivotal trials, SGLT2Is reduced serum urate (SU) levels, but the evidence in patients with gout under other urate-lowering drugs (ULD) in clinical grounds is scarce.The objective is to evaluate the urate outcomes in patients with gout treated with SGLT2I and ULD in clinical practice.

Methods: Retrospective, single-center observational study, enrolling patients with gout from a crystalarthritis specialised clinic. We selected those receiving combined treatment with ULD and SGLT2I, regardless ofthe indication. Cases with no serum urate levels available in the 6 months before andafter combined treatment or starting renal replacement therapy were excluded. The mainvariable of the study was SU level pre- and post-SGLT2I (mg/dL) statistically analized usingWilcoxon test as a non parametric continuous variable. As secondary variables, we measuredthe percentage achievement of SU target (< 6 mg/dL or < 5 mg/dL), the required allopurinoldose (mg) and pre-estimated dose according to the Easy-Allo tool (mg) [PMID 38359899].

Results: Forty-six patients were included: median age 76 years (IQR 15.25), 82.6% men, with highcomorbidity (91.1% with DM, 58.7% with KD, 45.7% with HF) and 10 years (IQR 20) of goutduration. As ULD, 66.7% (n=30) of patients were treated with allopurinol, 28.9% (n=13) withfebuxostat, and 4.4% (n=2) with benzbromarone. Regarding the SGLT2I, 58.7% (n=27) receiveddapagliflozin, 30.4% (n=14) empagliflozin, and 10.9% (n=5) canagliflozin. ULD were initiallyprescribed in 81.4% (n=35), while SGLT2I in the remaining 18.6% (n=8).The target of SU < 6 mg/dL was achieved in 97.7% (95%CI 88.2-99.6%) of the patients, while81.4% also reached < 5 mg/dL (95%CI 65.5-88.9%). The achievement of the < 5 mg/dL targetwas unrelated to the first prescribed medication (ULD 81.3% vs SGLT2I 87.5%, p=1.000) or thetype of xanthine-oxidase inhibitor (allopurinol 79.3% vs febuxostat 91.7%, p=0.651).The start of SGLT2I showed a median SU reduction of 0.85 mg/dL (IQR 3.02, p=0.001 for thebefore-after comparison) [Image 1]. The SU reduction was observed regardless of beingalready on ULD (median 0.80, IQR 2.90, p=0.021) or not (median 3.00, IQR 6.95, p=0.018) or ofchanges in diuretics use (p=0.692).No significant differences in allopurinol dose were found pre- and post-SGLT2I use but with atrend toward a lower dosage than pre-estimated by the Easy-Allo tool [Image 2].The use of SGLT2I showed significant reductions in fasting glucose, HbA1c, and C-reactiveprotein levels, increased urine glucose excretion, and no differences in urine albumin andglomerular filtration rate. We detected a significant reduction in diuretics use pre- and post-SGLT2I (60.9% vs 54.3%, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The combination of SGLT2I and ULD in patients with gout in clinical practice achievedsignificant SU level reductions and targets of SU < 6 mg/dL and < 5 mg/dL. A trend towards alower dosage requirement of allopurinol was noted, along with a reduced use of diuretics.These promising results require confirmation by further intervention studies.

Supporting image 1Image 1. Serum urate (SU) reduction in mg/dL after the start of SGLT2I.

In brackets, 95%CIs. In the pre-SGLT2I serum urate category, the values are higher, with a

mean close to 5.5 mg/dL and with regard to post-SGLT2I serum urate values these are lower,

with a mean close to 4 mg/dL.

Supporting image 2Image 2. Allopurinol dose pre-estimated and after the start of SGLT2I.

Box-and-bar plot of Allopurinol dose comparison. The boxes represent the interquartile range

(Q1 to Q3), the dark lines represent the median, and the brackets indicate the range of the data

excluding outliers. We can observe a higher variability in the dose of allopurinol after the

initiation of treatment with SGLT2I with a tendency towards the use of lower doses.


Disclosures: J. Doménech Serrano: None; I. García Loiseau: None; C. RodrÍguez-Alvear: None; P. Riesgo Sanchis: None; O. Moreno Pérez: None; M. Andrés: Grunenthal, 5, Sobi, 1.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Doménech Serrano J, García Loiseau I, RodrÍguez-Alvear C, Riesgo Sanchis P, Moreno Pérez O, Andrés M. Effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors and urate-lowering agents in patients with gout: data from a single-center specialised clinic [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effectiveness-of-sodium-glucose-cotransporter-type-2-inhibitors-and-urate-lowering-agents-in-patients-with-gout-data-from-a-single-center-specialised-clinic/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effectiveness-of-sodium-glucose-cotransporter-type-2-inhibitors-and-urate-lowering-agents-in-patients-with-gout-data-from-a-single-center-specialised-clinic/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology