ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2498

Does Physical Activity Modify the Relationship Between Pain and Corticosteroid Injection Utilization in Adults with or at High Risk for Knee Osteoarthritis?

Sydney Liles1, Daniel White2, Thomas Bye2 and Jason Jakiela2, 1University of Delaware, Elkton, MD, 2University of Delaware, Newark, DE

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: corticosteroids, Epidemiology, Osteoarthritis, pain, physical activity

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 14, 2023

Title: Abstracts: Interprofessional OA & Lupus

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:00PM-3:30PM

Background/Purpose: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading global cause of pain and disability, with no current cure. Knee pain is the most common symptom and a driving factor for patients to seek treatment for knee OA. Exercise and Corticosteroid (CS) injections are mainstays of treatment for knee OA, however, increased utilization of CS injections may increase the risk of radiographic knee OA progression and cartilage loss. Given this, physical activity (PA) may be an ideal first-line treatment, however, it is unknown if PA modifies the utilization of CS in those with varying levels of pain. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine if PA modifies the relationship between knee pain and utilization of CS injections during a 5-year follow-up period in adults with or at high risk for knee OA.

Methods: We used data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI). Our exposure was visual analogue scale (VAS) knee pain severity over the past 30 days, dichotomized using a patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) value into high (≥ 4) vs low pain (< 4) at the 48-month visit (analytic baseline, BL). Our outcome was receiving a CS injection. Participants were asked, “In the past 6 months, have you received a CS injection?” at the 48-, 60-, 72-, 84-, 96-, and 108-month follow-up visits. PA at BL was measured using an Actigraph GT1M and was examined as an effect measure modifier between pain and CS injection. We used 6000 steps/day to stratify the sample, as this cutoff was previously found to be associated with developing functional limitation. We excluded participants who answered yes to the CS injection question at BL. We produced Kaplan-Meier survival curves for cumulative incidence of not receiving a CS injection and used Cox proportional hazards regression to calculate discrete-time hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), adjusted for potential confounders.

Results: 1868 participants (mean age = 65.0 years old, 55% female, mean BMI = 28.5 kg/m2) were included in the overall analytic sample. 212 participants received at least one CS injection over 5 years of follow-up. In the ≥ 6000 steps/day group, survival probability was 82.9% for those with high pain and 93.7% for those with low pain (Figure 1). In the < 6000 steps/day group, survival probability was 78.5% for those with high pain and 93.4% for those with low pain (Figure 2). Participants with ≥ 4/10 pain that walked < 6000 steps/day had a 2.72 times greater hazard of receiving a CS injection compared to those with < 4/10 pain (adjusted HR [95% CI] = 2.72 [1.50, 4.94]). Participants with ≥ 4/10 pain that walked ≥ 6000 steps/day had a 1.48 times greater hazard of receiving a CS injection compared to those with < 4/10 pain, which did not reach statistical significance (adjusted HR [95% CI] = 1.48 [0.79, 2.78]) (Table 1).

Conclusion: In adults with knee OA who walk less than 6000 steps per day, high pain is associated with greater corticosteroid utilization. However, in those who walk at least 6000 steps per day, pain is not related to CS injection utilization over the next 5 years. This initial look suggests that daily walking may modify the relationship between pain and receiving a CS injection, though further research is warranted.

Supporting image 1

Figure 1: Kaplan-Meier survival curves for not receiving a CS injection by pain PASS exposure group in those who walked ≥ 6000 steps/day at baseline.

Supporting image 2

Figure 2: Kaplan-Meier survival curves for not receiving a CS injection by pain PASS exposure group in those who walked < 6000 steps/day at baseline.

Supporting image 3

Table 1: Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for receiving a CS injection, by pain PASS exposure group, stratified by steps/day at baseline.


Disclosures: S. Liles: None; D. White: Viatris, 6; T. Bye: None; J. Jakiela: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Liles S, White D, Bye T, Jakiela J. Does Physical Activity Modify the Relationship Between Pain and Corticosteroid Injection Utilization in Adults with or at High Risk for Knee Osteoarthritis? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/does-physical-activity-modify-the-relationship-between-pain-and-corticosteroid-injection-utilization-in-adults-with-or-at-high-risk-for-knee-osteoarthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/does-physical-activity-modify-the-relationship-between-pain-and-corticosteroid-injection-utilization-in-adults-with-or-at-high-risk-for-knee-osteoarthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology