ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meeting Abstracts
    • All Meetings
    • PRSYM 2026
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • Download Abstract Supplements
  • Keyword Index
  • My Favorites
    • View & print my favorites
  • Search

Home » Meeting Abstracts » ACR Convergence 2024

Abstract Number: 2136

Distal Radius Correlation with Femur and Lumbar Spine T-scores: A Comprehensive Analysis

Monder Lafi1, Hamzah Amin2, Muhammed Aqib Khan3 and Marwan Bukhari4, 1LANCASTER UNIVERSITY, Liverpool, United Kingdom, 2Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom, 3Lancaster Medical School, Lancaster, United Kingdom, 4University Hospitals of Morecambe bay NHS foundation trust, Lancaster, United Kingdom

Share on X (Twitter) Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on Email
Print

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Bone density, Fracture, Imaging, osteoporosis

Session Information

Date: Monday, November 18, 2024

Title: Osteoporosis & Metabolic Bone Disease – Basic & Clinical Science Poster

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Osteoporosis, defined by the WHO as a BMD reduction of 2.5 standard deviations below that of a young healthy adult, is a major public health concern, costing the NHS £4.4 billion annually. Current DEXA screening primarily targets the femoral neck and lumbar spine, requiring outpatient appointments. This limits patient access and timely diagnosis, particularly for individuals with severe obesity, hyperparathyroidism, or those who have undergone hip replacements. Consequently, distal radius (DR) scans are often only used for patients with rheumatoid arthritis or hyperparathyroidism. This study aims to evaluate the correlation of BMD at the distal radius (DR) with the femoral neck and lumbar spine to determine the utility of DR scans in osteoporosis diagnosis.

Methods: Data from patients referred for DEXA scans between 2004 and 2024 in northwest England were analysed. Inclusion criteria required DEXA scans at the DR, lumbar spine, and bilateral femoral regions, this was performed in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and hyperparathyroidism.. Stata(tm)  version 18 was used for the  analysis.  Pearson correlation coefficients and linear regression models adjusted for BMI, age, gender were fitted.

Results: 183 patients were included . The mean T-score at the DR in females was -1.37, significantly lower than at other sites. Correlation analysis revealed a weak association between the DR and lumbar spine (ρ=0.2496) but stronger correlations with femoral sites, especially the right femur neck (RFN) with ρ=0.3602. Unadjusted regression models showed an R² of 0.1297 between the DR and RFN, compared to 0.0623 for the lumbar spine. Adjusted models reinforced these findings, with the DR showing stronger predictive power for femoral BMD changes.

Conclusion: Distal radius measurements show significant potential for osteoporosis screening and diagnosis, especially when femoral scans are not feasible. Our results indicate that DR measurements correlate well with femoral BMD, particularly at the femoral neck, and could be effectively used in osteoporosis diagnosis when femoral scans are impractical. While some of our findings differ from previous research, such as Han et al. (2013) and Pu et al. (2022), who reported stronger correlations between forearm and lumbar spine BMD, our study emphasizes the robustness of DR as a predictor for femoral BMD. These findings are promising and highlight the potential for DR measurements to enhance osteoporosis screening, leading to earlier detection and improved patient outcomes. The observed differences also open avenues for further research to explore and clarify these relationships. Despite some limitations, including sample size and potential confounding factors, our study provides a strong foundation for the clinical use of DR measurements. This approach could improve osteoporosis detection, reduce fractures, and enhance patient care. Further research is needed to optimize the clinical use of DR measurements.

Supporting image 1

Legend: Pearson correlation coefficients for T-score measurements at various anatomical sites. The colour gradient from red to green visually distinguishes the strength and direction of correlations: red symbolizes a strong negative correlation approaching _1, and green represents a strong positive correlation nearing +1. (DR = Distal radius, LFN = left neck of femur, RFN = right neck of femur, LFT = left femur total/mean of all left femur sites , RFT = right femur total/ mean of all right sites)

Supporting image 2

Legend: Adjusted R-squared values from regression models measuring the strength of the relationship between T-scores at the distal radius (DR), left neck of the femur (LFN), left femur total (LFT), right neck of the femur (RFN), right femur total (RFT), and lumbar vertebrae L1 and L4, adjusted for demographic and clinical variables. The color-coded scale ranges from red (no correlation) to green (perfect correlation) to aid in visual interpretation.

Supporting image 3

This figure displays a matrix of scatter plots revealing the correlations between T-scores at the distal radius (DR), left femur total (LFT), right femur total (RFT), and lumbar vertebra L4 (L4). Each scatter plot compares T-scores between two measurement sites, with the inclusion of key statistical metrics: Pearson correlation coefficient (ρ), R², adjusted R² (AdjR²), and beta coefficient (β).


Disclosures: M. Lafi: None; H. Amin: None; M. Khan: None; M. Bukhari: AbbVie/Abbott, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 6, Eli Lilly, 6, Gilead, 6, UCB, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Lafi M, Amin H, Khan M, Bukhari M. Distal Radius Correlation with Femur and Lumbar Spine T-scores: A Comprehensive Analysis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/distal-radius-correlation-with-femur-and-lumbar-spine-t-scores-a-comprehensive-analysis/. Accessed .

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/distal-radius-correlation-with-femur-and-lumbar-spine-t-scores-a-comprehensive-analysis/

My Favorites

Save and print abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract (must have cookies enabled in browser). See saved favorites.

Abstract Policies

  • ACR Convergence Abstract Embargo Policies
  • ACR Convergence Abstract Permissions & Reprints
  • PRSYM Abstract Policies

ACR Convergence. Where Rheumatology Meets

ACR Convergence 2026

Join us November 6-11 in Orlando, Florida.
See Registration Information

  • Contact ACR
  • Privacy Policy
  • ACR Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2026 American College of Rheumatology