ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2136

Distal Radius Correlation with Femur and Lumbar Spine T-scores: A Comprehensive Analysis

Monder Lafi1, Hamzah Amin2, Muhammed Aqib Khan3 and Marwan Bukhari4, 1LANCASTER UNIVERSITY, Liverpool, United Kingdom, 2Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom, 3Lancaster Medical School, Lancaster, United Kingdom, 4University Hospitals of Morecambe bay NHS foundation trust, Lancaster, United Kingdom

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Bone density, Fracture, Imaging, osteoporosis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 18, 2024

Title: Osteoporosis & Metabolic Bone Disease – Basic & Clinical Science Poster

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Osteoporosis, defined by the WHO as a BMD reduction of 2.5 standard deviations below that of a young healthy adult, is a major public health concern, costing the NHS £4.4 billion annually. Current DEXA screening primarily targets the femoral neck and lumbar spine, requiring outpatient appointments. This limits patient access and timely diagnosis, particularly for individuals with severe obesity, hyperparathyroidism, or those who have undergone hip replacements. Consequently, distal radius (DR) scans are often only used for patients with rheumatoid arthritis or hyperparathyroidism. This study aims to evaluate the correlation of BMD at the distal radius (DR) with the femoral neck and lumbar spine to determine the utility of DR scans in osteoporosis diagnosis.

Methods: Data from patients referred for DEXA scans between 2004 and 2024 in northwest England were analysed. Inclusion criteria required DEXA scans at the DR, lumbar spine, and bilateral femoral regions, this was performed in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and hyperparathyroidism.. Stata(tm)  version 18 was used for the  analysis.  Pearson correlation coefficients and linear regression models adjusted for BMI, age, gender were fitted.

Results: 183 patients were included . The mean T-score at the DR in females was -1.37, significantly lower than at other sites. Correlation analysis revealed a weak association between the DR and lumbar spine (ρ=0.2496) but stronger correlations with femoral sites, especially the right femur neck (RFN) with ρ=0.3602. Unadjusted regression models showed an R² of 0.1297 between the DR and RFN, compared to 0.0623 for the lumbar spine. Adjusted models reinforced these findings, with the DR showing stronger predictive power for femoral BMD changes.

Conclusion: Distal radius measurements show significant potential for osteoporosis screening and diagnosis, especially when femoral scans are not feasible. Our results indicate that DR measurements correlate well with femoral BMD, particularly at the femoral neck, and could be effectively used in osteoporosis diagnosis when femoral scans are impractical. While some of our findings differ from previous research, such as Han et al. (2013) and Pu et al. (2022), who reported stronger correlations between forearm and lumbar spine BMD, our study emphasizes the robustness of DR as a predictor for femoral BMD. These findings are promising and highlight the potential for DR measurements to enhance osteoporosis screening, leading to earlier detection and improved patient outcomes. The observed differences also open avenues for further research to explore and clarify these relationships. Despite some limitations, including sample size and potential confounding factors, our study provides a strong foundation for the clinical use of DR measurements. This approach could improve osteoporosis detection, reduce fractures, and enhance patient care. Further research is needed to optimize the clinical use of DR measurements.

Supporting image 1

Legend: Pearson correlation coefficients for T-score measurements at various anatomical sites. The colour gradient from red to green visually distinguishes the strength and direction of correlations: red symbolizes a strong negative correlation approaching _1, and green represents a strong positive correlation nearing +1. (DR = Distal radius, LFN = left neck of femur, RFN = right neck of femur, LFT = left femur total/mean of all left femur sites , RFT = right femur total/ mean of all right sites)

Supporting image 2

Legend: Adjusted R-squared values from regression models measuring the strength of the relationship between T-scores at the distal radius (DR), left neck of the femur (LFN), left femur total (LFT), right neck of the femur (RFN), right femur total (RFT), and lumbar vertebrae L1 and L4, adjusted for demographic and clinical variables. The color-coded scale ranges from red (no correlation) to green (perfect correlation) to aid in visual interpretation.

Supporting image 3

This figure displays a matrix of scatter plots revealing the correlations between T-scores at the distal radius (DR), left femur total (LFT), right femur total (RFT), and lumbar vertebra L4 (L4). Each scatter plot compares T-scores between two measurement sites, with the inclusion of key statistical metrics: Pearson correlation coefficient (ρ), R², adjusted R² (AdjR²), and beta coefficient (β).


Disclosures: M. Lafi: None; H. Amin: None; M. Khan: None; M. Bukhari: AbbVie/Abbott, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 6, Eli Lilly, 6, Gilead, 6, UCB, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Lafi M, Amin H, Khan M, Bukhari M. Distal Radius Correlation with Femur and Lumbar Spine T-scores: A Comprehensive Analysis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/distal-radius-correlation-with-femur-and-lumbar-spine-t-scores-a-comprehensive-analysis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/distal-radius-correlation-with-femur-and-lumbar-spine-t-scores-a-comprehensive-analysis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology