ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 298

Disease Progression in Osteoarthritis Is Driven By Multiple Disease Parameters Leading to Comparable Levels of Joint Destruction

Anne C. Bay-Jensen1, Asger Bihlet2, Inger Byrjalsen2, Jeppe Andersen3, Christian S. Thudium4, Bente J. Riis2, Claus Christiansen2, Hans Guehring5, Martin Michaelis5, Christoph Ladel5 and Morten Asser Karsdal6, 1Rheumatology, Nordic Bioscience, Biomarkers and Research, Herlev, Denmark, 2Nordic Bioscience, Clinical Development, Herlev, Denmark, 3Clinical Development, Nordic Bioscience, Herlev, Denmark, 4Biomarkers and Research, Nordic Bioscience, Herlev, Denmark, 5Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, 6Rheumatology, Nordic Bioscience, Herlev, Denmark

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Biomarkers, inflammatory arthritis, osteoarthritis and phenotypes, Personalized Medicine

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Osteoarthritis – Clinical Aspects - Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:  There is a need for successful drug development in osteoarthritis (OA) as there are currently no disease modifying drugs approved for OA. This may be due to: patient heterogeneity resulting from different disease drivers, clinical studies are complicated by unintended inclusion of patients with little or no disease activity (DA)/progression, lack of surrogate markers for DA in OA. The aim was to investigate clinical characteristics of an RA-like phenotype in OA in 2 OA phase III studies.

Methods:  Biochemical DA was assessed in serum from RA and OA patients by the acute reactant CRP and its proteolytic product CRPM1. Association between CRPM and DA scores was investigated by spearman’s rho in the placebo group of the LITHE study (n=193, a phase III RA RCT2). OA patients were divided into 4 groups: patients with no inflammation [CRPM<9nM], local inflammation [CRPM>9nM/hsCRP<3g/L], acute inflammation [CRPM<9nM/hsCRP>3g/L], and active disease [CRPM>9nM/hsCRP>3g/L] (table). Biomarkers of soft tissue degradation (C1M, C3M), cartilage degradation (C2M, UCTX-II), bone balance (CTX/OC) and macrophage activity (VICM) were measured in the placebo groups of 2 phase III OA clinical trials (SMC1 and SMC2) including patients with radiographic knee OA3. Kellgren-Lawrence grade (KLG), joint space width (JSW) and WOMAC were recorded at baseline and 2 years

Results:  Association between DA and CRPM in RA. There was a significant correlation between DA and CRPM: HAQ (0.24. p=0.0007), VAS pain (0.16, p=0.023) and DAS28 (0.29, p<0.0001). CRP accounted for about 30% of the biological variation in CRPM, indicating CRP and CRPM reflect different biological processes, and provide independent information. Identification of OA phenotypes. The mean CRPM level was significantly high in RA than OA patients (17.1 vs. 8.5, p<0.0001); however, 31-40% of OA patients had CRPM>9nM, thus overlapping with 75% of the RA. Tissue degradation in OA. In SMC1, C1M and VICM were significantly increased in patients with high DA (p<0.0001). C2M was higher (p=0.006) in patients with local inflammation. C3M was higher in patients with local inflammation, but without acute inflammation (table). The results was replicated in SMC2. OA phenotypes and progression. There were no difference in 2-year progression of KLG, JSW, WOMAC amongst the 4 groups.

Conclusion:  This study provides a major finding: Clinical outcome measures were not different between the groups. Consequently, these data indicate that each different phenotype progress at a comparable rate; however, the underlying pathogenesis is likely to be different, thus should be targeted differently.1Siebuhr OAC,22,44,2014.2Bay-Jensen, SAR,43,470,2014.3Karsdal OAC, 23, 532,2015.


Disclosure: A. C. Bay-Jensen, Nordic Bioscience A/, 1,Nordic Bioscience A/S, 3,D-BOARD, 2; A. Bihlet, Nordic Bioscience Diagnostic, 3; I. Byrjalsen, Nordic Bioscience A/S, 3; J. Andersen, Nordic Bioscience A/S, 1,Nordic Bioscience A/S, 3; C. S. Thudium, Nordic Bioscience A/S, 3; B. J. Riis, Nordic Bioscience A/S, 1; C. Christiansen, Nordic Bioscience A/S, 1; H. Guehring, Merck KGaA, 3; M. Michaelis, Merck KGaA, 3; C. Ladel, Merck KGaA, 3; M. A. Karsdal, Nordic Bioscience A/S, 1,Nordic Bioscience A/S, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Bay-Jensen AC, Bihlet A, Byrjalsen I, Andersen J, Thudium CS, Riis BJ, Christiansen C, Guehring H, Michaelis M, Ladel C, Karsdal MA. Disease Progression in Osteoarthritis Is Driven By Multiple Disease Parameters Leading to Comparable Levels of Joint Destruction [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/disease-progression-in-osteoarthritis-is-driven-by-multiple-disease-parameters-leading-to-comparable-levels-of-joint-destruction/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/disease-progression-in-osteoarthritis-is-driven-by-multiple-disease-parameters-leading-to-comparable-levels-of-joint-destruction/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology