ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0827

Discontinuation Rate of Tofacitinib as Monotherapy Is Similar Compared to Combination Therapy with Methotrexate in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: Pooled Data from Two Rheumatoid Arthritis Registries in Canada

Mohammad Movahedi1, Denis Choquette2, Louis Coupal2, Angela Cesta3, Xiuying Li3, Edward Keystone4 and Claire Bombardier5, 1Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Institut de Rhumatologie de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada, 3Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, UHN, Toronto, ON, Canada, 4Keystone Consulting Enterprises Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada, 5University of Toronto - Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Cohort Study, Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards), Patient reported outcomes, registry, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 7, 2021

Title: RA – Treatments Poster I: Comparative Effectiveness, Biosimilars, Withdrawal, & the Real World (0813–0845)

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Tofacitinib (TOFA) is an oral, small molecule drug used for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment and is prescribed alone or with methotrexate (MTX). We previously reported the similarity in retention between TOFA monotherapy and TOFA with MTX using data from two different registries separately; the Ontario Best Practices Research Initiative (OBRI) and the Quebec registry RHUMADATA.

Methods: RA patients enrolled in the OBRI and RHUMADATA initiating their TOFA between 1st June 2014 (TOFA approval date in Canada) and 31st Dec 2019 were included. Concurrent MTX use was defined as MTX use for more than 75% of the time while using TOFA. Multiple imputation (Imputation Chained Equation method, N=20) was used to deal with missing data for covariates at treatment initiation.
Time to discontinuation was assessed using Cox regression models. To deal with confounding by indication, we estimated propensity scores for selected covariates with an absolute standard difference greater than 0.1. We then adjusted Cox regression models for propensity quantile to compare the discontinuation of TOFA with MTX versus TOFA without MTX.

Results: A total of 493 patients were included. Of those, 244 (49.5%) and 249 (51.5%) were treated with MTX and without MTX, respectively. Compared to TOFA monotherapy, the TOFA with MTX group had a significantly lower mean HAQ-DI, fatigue score, and the number of prior biologic use at the time of TOFA initiation. A lower proportion of positive ACPA (59% vs. 66%), prevalence of hypertension (31% vs 37%), and concomitant use of Leflunomide (11% vs. 23%) were also observed for patients using TOFA with MTX.
Over a mean follow-up of 19.0 months, discontinuation was reported in 182 (36.9%) of all TOFA patients. After adjusting for propensity score quantile across 20 imputed datasets, there was no significant difference in discontinuation between treatment groups (adjusted HRs: 1.12, 95% CI: 0.83-1.51; p=0.49) (Figure 1).

Conclusion: In this pooled real-world data study, we found that in patients with RA, the retention of TOFA is similar if it is used as monotherapy or in combination with MTX.

Figure 1. TOFA retention with and without MTX


Disclosures: M. Movahedi, None; D. Choquette, AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, Celltrion, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, Sandoz, 2, 5, Sanofi, 2, 5, Teva Pharmaceuticals, 2, Gilead Sciences, 2; L. Coupal, None; A. Cesta, None; X. Li, None; E. Keystone, AbbVie, 2, 6, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, 2, Celltrion, 2, Gilead Sciences, 2, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, 2, 6, Janssen, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, Merck, 2, 5, 6, Myriad Autoimmune, 2, Novartis, 6, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, 6, PuraPharm, 5, Sandoz, 2, Sanofi-Genzyme, 2, 6, Samsung Bioepis, 2; C. Bombardier, AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Amgen, 5, BGP Pharma ULC, 1, 6, Gilead, 5, GSK, 1, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, Lilly Pharmaceuticals, 5, Medreleaf/Aurora, 5, Merck, 1, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, 1, 5, Sandoz, 5, Samsung Bioepis, 2, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Movahedi M, Choquette D, Coupal L, Cesta A, Li X, Keystone E, Bombardier C. Discontinuation Rate of Tofacitinib as Monotherapy Is Similar Compared to Combination Therapy with Methotrexate in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: Pooled Data from Two Rheumatoid Arthritis Registries in Canada [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/discontinuation-rate-of-tofacitinib-as-monotherapy-is-similar-compared-to-combination-therapy-with-methotrexate-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-pooled-data-from-two-rheumatoid-arthritis-registries-i/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/discontinuation-rate-of-tofacitinib-as-monotherapy-is-similar-compared-to-combination-therapy-with-methotrexate-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-pooled-data-from-two-rheumatoid-arthritis-registries-i/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology