ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1380

Digital Occlusive Arterial Disease on Laser Doppler Flowmetry Increases the Risk of Digital Ischemic Complications in Systemic Sclerosis: Results from a Single Center Referral Cohort (2001-2018)

Yasser Radwan1, Tina Gunderson2, Cynthia Crowson2, David Liedl2, Kenneth Warrington3, Paul Wennberg2 and Ashima Makol2, 1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA, Lansing, MI, 2Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA, Rochester, MN, 3Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Scleroderma, Systemic sclerosis, Ulcers

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2020

Title: Systemic Sclerosis & Related Disorders – Clinical Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Vascular dysfunction is a key feature of systemic sclerosis (SSc), manifesting clinically as Raynaud’s phenomenon (RP) with or without digital ischemia. Laser doppler flowmetry (LDF) with thermal challenge is a safe, noninvasive and reproducible technique to detect digital occlusive arterial disease (DOAD) with a high sensitivity and specificity of >90% (1). The presence and associations of DOAD in SSc are not well defined. We studied the prevalence and clinical correlates of DOAD on LDF in SSc patients referred for evaluation of RP at a tertiary referral center.

Methods: Medical records of all SSc patients meeting ACR/EULAR 2013 classification criteria that underwent upper extremity vascular study with LDF between Jan 2001-Dec 2018 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed to abstract the presence or absence of DOAD. The presence of DOAD on LDF was confirmed if pre- and post-warming skin blood flow was ≤206 arbitrary units. Severity of DOAD was assessed based on number of digits involved. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes were abstracted. Risk factors associated with presence of DOAD in SSc and correlation between presence and severity of DOAD with digital ischemic complications were studied.

Results: 304 SSc patients (mean age 57.1 ± 13.3 y, 81% female, 93% Caucasian) underwent LDF during the study period. Majority had limited cutaneous SSc (lcSSc) (79.6%) and 64.1% had a positive SSc specific antibody. Cohort characteristics are described in Table 1.

On LDF, presence of DOAD was noted in 243 (79.9%) SSc patients. Of these, 78.6% had lcSSc, 42.4% had a centromere antibody (Ab), 17.3% had a Scl-70 Ab, 53.5% had interstitial lung disease, 36.6% had pulmonary arterial hypertension, and 73.3% had gastrointestinal dysmotility (GID). Of 159 DOAD patients who had their digital nailfold examined, 70.4% had nailfold capillary abnormalities. After adjusting for age/sex, GID (OR: 2.73, p < 0.001) and telangiectasia (OR: 2.83, p 0.013) were significantly associated with DOAD on LDF.

Digital ischemic complications among SSc patients with DOAD were significantly higher than among those without DOAD (79.8% vs 41.0% had digital ulcers, 53.9% vs 26.2% had pitting/scars, 31.3% vs 8.2% had gangrene/amputation; p < 0.001). (Figure 1) Increasing severity of DOAD was associated with a statistically significant increase in incidence of digital ischemic complications as presented in Table 2.

Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first and largest study to describe the prevalence and predictors of DOAD on LDF in a well-defined cohort of SSc patients. The high prevalence of DOAD on LDF noted in SSc related RP makes it an important tool for evaluation of microangiopathy in SSc and distinguishing it from primary RP. The presence and severity of DOAD also correlates with digital ischemic complications. Our study underscores the significance of LDF as a reliable non-invasive method for detecting DOAD and as a prognostic tool to identify patients at risk of digital ulcers that need closer follow-up and more aggressive management of their vasculopathy to prevent ischemic complications.

(1) Mahe G et al. J Vasc Surg. 2014 Apr;59(4):1051-1057.e1

Table 1. Clinical Characteristics of 304 Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) Patients that Underwent Laser Doppler Flowmetry (LDF) with Thermal Challenge (2001-2018) Overall and by Presence or Absence of Digital Occlusive Arterial Disease (DOAD)*

Figure 1. Correlation between Presence of Digital Occlusive Arterial Disease (DOAD) on Laser Doppler Flowmetry and Digital Ischemic Complications in Systemic Sclerosis

Table 2. Logistic Regression Models for the Association of Digital Ischemic Complications and Severity of Digital Occlusive Arterial Disease (DOAD) on Laser Doppler Flowmetry with Thermal Challenge


Disclosure: Y. Radwan, None; T. Gunderson, None; C. Crowson, Myriad Genetics, 1, Pfizer, 1; D. Liedl, None; K. Warrington, Lilly, 2, Kiniksa, 2; P. Wennberg, None; A. Makol, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Radwan Y, Gunderson T, Crowson C, Liedl D, Warrington K, Wennberg P, Makol A. Digital Occlusive Arterial Disease on Laser Doppler Flowmetry Increases the Risk of Digital Ischemic Complications in Systemic Sclerosis: Results from a Single Center Referral Cohort (2001-2018) [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/digital-occlusive-arterial-disease-on-laser-doppler-flowmetry-increases-the-risk-of-digital-ischemic-complications-in-systemic-sclerosis-results-from-a-single-center-referral-cohort-2001-2018/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/digital-occlusive-arterial-disease-on-laser-doppler-flowmetry-increases-the-risk-of-digital-ischemic-complications-in-systemic-sclerosis-results-from-a-single-center-referral-cohort-2001-2018/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology