ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1203

Differences in Serum Protein Biomarkers between Combined Glucosamine and Chondroitin Versus Celecoxib Treatment in a Randomized, Double-Blind Trial in Osteoarthritis Patients

Sandi L Navarro1, Marta Herrero2, Helena Martinez2, Jon Ladd1, Yuzheng Zhang1, Edward Lo1, David Shelley1, Timothy W Randolph1, Yvonne Schwarz1, Johanna W Lampe1 and Paul D Lampe1, 1Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, 2Clinical R&D Area, Bioiberica, SAU, Barcelona, Spain

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: chondroitin, Glucosamine, Inflammation, osteoarthritis and randomized trials

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 6, 2017

Title: Osteoarthritis – Clinical Aspects Poster I: Clinical Trials and Interventions

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, e.g., celecoxib, are commonly used for inflammatory conditions, including osteoarthritis (OA), but are associated with adverse effects. Combined glucosamine hydrochloride plus chondroitin sulfate (GH+CS) is commonly used for joint pain and has no known adverse side effects. Evidence from in vitro, animal and human studies suggests that GH and CS have anti-inflammatory activity, among other mechanisms of action.

Methods: In this study, we evaluated a panel of 20 serum proteins involved in inflammation and other metabolic signaling pathways after treatment with pharmaceutical grade 1500 mg GH + 1200 mg CS daily (n=96) versus 200 mg celecoxib once a day (n=93) in a 6-month randomized, parallel, double-blind trial of knee OA patients. All patients had Kellgren and Lawrence grades 2-3 knee OA and moderate-to-severe pain as defined by Western Ontario and McMaster osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) score ≥ 301; on a 0-500 scale. We used linear mixed models adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, baseline serum protein values, and rescue medicine use to assess the intervention effects of each treatment arm separately and between treatments. Benjamini-Hochberg FDR (q<0.05) was used to control for multiple testing.

Results: When evaluating treatments separately, all serum proteins except WNT16 were lower after treatment with GH+CS, while about half of the proteins increased after celecoxib. IL-6 was statistically significantly reduced (by 9%, P=0.001) after GH+CS, and satisfied the FDR threshold of q<0.05. There were statistically significant increases for CCL20, CSF3, and WNT16 after celecoxib (by 7%, 9% and 9%, respectively, P<0.05), but these proteins were no longer statistically significant after controlling for multiple testing. There were no statistically significant differences in any proteins when comparing serum protein concentrations at end of treatment between GH+CS and celecoxib.

Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrate that GH+CS reduces IL-6, an inflammatory cytokine, but is otherwise comparable to celecoxib with regard to effects on other protein biomarkers.

Trial registration number: NCT01425853.


Table 1. Protein biomarker effect sizes after 6 month treatment with combined glucosamine and chondroitin (GH+CS) and celecoxib

Biomarker

GH+CS (n=96)

Celecoxib (n=93)

GH+CS versus Celecoxib (n=189)

Effect size

(unadjusted)1

P

Effect size

(adjusted)2

P*

Effect size

(unadjusted)1

P

Effect size

(adjusted)2

P*

Effect size3

(adjusted)

P*

C1orf38

-0.08

0.52

-0.03

0.55

-0.02

0.83

-0.02

0.65

-0.004

0.94

CCL20

-0.04

0.63

-0.02

0.63

0.24

0.05

0.07

0.04

0.06

0.15

CEACAM1

-0.11

0.39

-0.03

0.56

0.05

0.73

0.01

0.98

0.016

0.81

CRP

-0.12

0.30

-0.04

0.34

0.04

0.74

0.001

0.94

0.04

0.46

CSF3

-0.15

0.27

-0.06

0.16

0.20

0.03

0.09

0.05

0.09

0.13

CXCL12

0.06

0.43

-0.01

0.59

0.20

0.44

0.03

0.24

-0.003

0.93

HBEGF

-0.15

0.23

-0.08

0.24

-0.06

0.71

-0.06

0.43

-0.007

0.94

IL13

-0.04

0.76

-0.01

0.85

0.02

0.86

0.001

0.98

-0.01

0.80

IL6

-0.24

0.01

-0.09

0.001*

0.13

0.64

-0.02

0.51

0.04

0.38

CCSP-1

-0.04

0.71

-0.02

0.70

0.06

0.65

0.02

0.76

0.02

0.82

ITGA5

-0.05

0.67

-0.01

0.80

-0.04

0.70

-0.04

0.41

-0.02

0.74

MARVELD2

-0.08

0.54

-0.02

0.49

0.04

0.76

0.005

0.87

0.012

0.79

MUC3B4

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

NCKIPSD

-0.19

0.09

-0.08

0.07

0.00

0.99

-0.006

0.86

0.05

0.32

NPR3

-0.16

0.23

-0.03

0.38

-0.02

0.85

-0.001

0.97

0.0006

0.99

SFRS12

-0.12

0.25

-0.05

0.22

-0.02

0.85

-0.009

0.80

0.03

0.52

SPP1/Osteopontin

-0.13

0.28

-0.08

0.20

-0.20

0.17

-0.11

0.06

-0.04

0.63

THBS4

-0.10

0.31

-0.04

0.31

0.03

0.77

0.002

0.96

0.03

0.63

TNFRSF17

-0.10

0.45

-0.06

0.33

0.01

0.95

-0.007

0.91

0.05

0.60

TSG101

-0.16

0.13

-0.07

0.09

0.05

0.72

0.009

0.84

0.07

0.24

WNT16

0.14

0.78

0.05

0.31

0.09

0.10

0.09

0.04

0.05

0.46

Values represent effect sizes in biomarker values pre-to-post intervention from: 1paired t-tests (unadjusted models with the exception of hybridization and plate day); 2 linear mixed regression models adjusted for sex, age, BMI, baseline biomarker values, use of rescue medication, and hybridization and plate day.

3Values represent differences between GH+CS to celecoxib.

4This biomarker failed to hybridize for a large proportion of samples and was excluded from analysis.

*Significant with Benjamini-Hochberg FDR q<0.05

 


Disclosure: S. L. Navarro, Bioiberica, SA, 9; M. Herrero, Bioiberica, SA, 3; H. Martinez, Bioiberica, SA, 3; J. Ladd, None; Y. Zhang, None; E. Lo, None; D. Shelley, None; T. W. Randolph, None; Y. Schwarz, None; J. W. Lampe, None; P. D. Lampe, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Navarro SL, Herrero M, Martinez H, Ladd J, Zhang Y, Lo E, Shelley D, Randolph TW, Schwarz Y, Lampe JW, Lampe PD. Differences in Serum Protein Biomarkers between Combined Glucosamine and Chondroitin Versus Celecoxib Treatment in a Randomized, Double-Blind Trial in Osteoarthritis Patients [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/differences-in-serum-protein-biomarkers-between-combined-glucosamine-and-chondroitin-versus-celecoxib-treatment-in-a-randomized-double-blind-trial-in-osteoarthritis-patients/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/differences-in-serum-protein-biomarkers-between-combined-glucosamine-and-chondroitin-versus-celecoxib-treatment-in-a-randomized-double-blind-trial-in-osteoarthritis-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology