ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meeting Abstracts
    • All Meetings
    • PRSYM 2026
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • Download Abstract Supplements
  • Keyword Index
  • Search
  • My Favorites
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all favorites

Abstract Number: 0707

Comprehensive Skin Assessment in Systemic Sclerosis Using Spatial Frequency Domain Imaging (SFDI)

Hung Vo1, Aarohi Mehendale2, Mahendra Chaudhari3, Fatima El adili3, Jeffrey Browning4, Michael York5, Marcin Trojanowski6, Eugene Kissin7, Darren Roblyer2 and Andreea Bujor5, 1Boston Medical Center, Peabody, MA, 2Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, 3Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, 4Boston University, Cambridge, MA, 5Boston University, Boston, MA, 6Department of Rheumatology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 7Boston University, Newton, MA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Imaging, Systemic sclerosis

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 16, 2024

Title: Systemic Sclerosis & Related Disorders – Clinical Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: The modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) is the gold standard for scleroderma (SSc) skin assessment, yet it suffers from subjectivity and interrater variability. Spatial Frequency Domain Imaging (SFDI) utilizes near-infrared light to quantify optical tissue properties like diffuse reflectance (Rd) and reduced scattering coefficients (μs´) (Fig. 1A). In a small pilot study, we demonstrated SFDI’s ability to detect skin changes in SSc, with excellent intra- and inter-rater reliability (1). Our present study further evaluates SFDI in a larger cohort of SSc patients and controls, as well as its ability to detect longitudinal skin changes in SSc. The correlation of SFDI with local durometry, ultrasound thickness and histology scores were also assessed.

Methods: 33 SSc patients with early diffuse SSc (< 5 years) and 19 healthy controls were enrolled. SFDI parameters (μs´ and Rd measured at 0.2 mm-1 and 851 nm) were recorded from 6 sites: left/right forearms, hands, and fingers. Dermal thickness was measured using high frequency ultrasound (HUS) with a 20 MHz probe at the mid-dorsal forearm, and a skin biopsy was collected at the same location. The mRSS was measured using the averaging method by a trained physician blinded to SFDI and HUS measurements. H&E skin sections were assessed for overall collagen fiber thickening using a 0-3 visual scoring system, and alpha smooth muscle actin (ASMA) positive fibroblast score was assessed on a VAS after exclusion of adnexal structures and vasculature. Longitudinal data was available for 10 SSc patients, and change in SFDI scores were compared to change in mRSS and HUS scores in each patient. Spearman correlation (rs) was used to calculate correlation coefficients.

Results: In single time point analyses, healthy controls exhibited significantly higher μs´ and Rd values than SSc subjects, even in patients with no evident skin thickening by mRSS (mRSS=0), suggesting that SFDI can reveal subclinical skin changes in SSc (Fig 1D). At the biopsy site, both SFDI parameters showed significant correlations with the collagen fiber thickness scores (H&E) and fibroblast activation scores (ASMA). Forearm SFDI parameters had a significant correlation with local mRSS, local hardness (durometry score) and local dermal thickness (HUS score), as shown in Table 1. Analysis of longitudinal changes in SFDI parameters revealed a strong correlation between changes in Rd (∆Rd) and changes in mRSS (∆mRSS) (rs = -0.79, p = 0.007, Fig 2A) and good, albeit not significant, correlations between ∆μs´ and ∆mRSS (rs = -0.63, p = 0.054 Fig 2B), likely due to the small sample size. Similar results were obtained when comparing changes in SFDI with changes in HUS (rs=0.65, p=0.06 for ∆Rd and rs=0.6, p=0.09 for ∆μs´).

Conclusion: SFDI can distinguish early skin changes in systemic sclerosis (SSc) from healthy controls and provides a comprehensive view of SSc-related alterations, including dermal thickness, skin hardness, and collagen content. Furthermore, SFDI shows promise in tracking longitudinal skin changes in SSc patients, making it a versatile tool for monitoring disease progression and treatment response.

References:

Pilvar A, et al. Biomed Opt Express. 2023;14(6):2955. doi:10.1364/BOE.489609

Supporting image 1

Figure 1. A) Schematic diagram of a SFDI system. B) SFDI data acquisition and processing flowchart. Raw images are captured, then demodulated, corrected for height and angle variability, and calibrated. The Rd maps are then converted into optical property maps (µa for absorption and µs´ for reduced scattering) using a LUT inverse model. C) Demographic and clinical summary of enrolled subjects. D) Difference between healthy controls, SSc patient with local mRSS = 0, 1, 2, 3. Each dot represents measurement at a single site. ****p < 0.0001. Panels A and B are adapted from reference (1).

Supporting image 2

Table 1. Correlation between SFDI parameters and histology scores, skin hardness, and dermal thickness scores. Alpha smooth muscle actin (ASMA) was semi-quantitatively assessed using a 10 cm visual analog scale (0 for no staining to 100 for diffuse staining). H&E stained skin sections were assessed for overall collagen fiber thickening using a 0_3 visual scoring system developed by Dr. Jeff Browning at BUMC. All assessments were done in a blinded manner by two independent investigators.

Supporting image 3

Figure 2. Changes in SFDI parameters correlate with changes in mRSS. Spearman correlation analysis illustrating the change (∆) in Rd (A) and µs’ (B) versus the change (∆) in mRSS. Each dot represents an individual patient. The changes were calculated using the sum of mRSS, µs´, and Rd at 6 sites (left and right fingers, hands, and forearms).


Disclosures: H. Vo: None; A. Mehendale: None; M. Chaudhari: None; F. El adili: None; J. Browning: None; M. York: None; M. Trojanowski: None; E. Kissin: None; D. Roblyer: None; A. Bujor: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Vo H, Mehendale A, Chaudhari M, El adili F, Browning J, York M, Trojanowski M, Kissin E, Roblyer D, Bujor A. Comprehensive Skin Assessment in Systemic Sclerosis Using Spatial Frequency Domain Imaging (SFDI) [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comprehensive-skin-assessment-in-systemic-sclerosis-using-spatial-frequency-domain-imaging-sfdi/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comprehensive-skin-assessment-in-systemic-sclerosis-using-spatial-frequency-domain-imaging-sfdi/

Advanced Search

My Favorites

Save and print abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract (must have cookies enabled in browser). See saved favorites.

Abstract Policies

  • ACR Convergence Abstract Embargo Policies
  • ACR Convergence Abstract Permissions & Reprints
  • PRSYM Abstract Policies

ACR Convergence. Where Rheumatology Meets

ACR Convergence 2026

Join us November 6-11 in Orlando, Florida.
See Registration Information

  • Contact ACR
  • Privacy Policy
  • ACR Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2026 American College of Rheumatology