ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2407

Comparison of Knee Osteoarthritis Treatment in the Non-Obese Versus Obese Populations Across Different Medical Specialties

Kelly Forrester1, Farah Taufiq1 and Jonathan Samuels2,3, 1NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, 2Rheumatology, NYU - Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY, 3Rheumatology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Knee, obesity, Osteoarthritis, pain and treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: Osteoarthritis - Clinical Aspects Poster II: Biomarkers, Biomechanics and Health Services Research

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:   Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) in the obese population is underdiagnosed and routinely undertreated, as providers often attribute pain to excess weight without considering articular pathology.  The literature does not speculate if obese and non-obese patients are offered the same treatment options for their KOA.  Using a retrospective chart review, we compared approaches to KOA treatment across BMI subgroups as well as between physician specialties: rheumatology, orthopedics, sports medicine, physiatry, and internal medicine.

Methods:   We searched the NYU electronic medical record between January 1 and December 31, 2013 for patients seen for KOA by selected physicians in the 5 specialties.  From the resulting list of 4,486 patients, we reviewed the first 1,500 charts and selected for clinical and radiographic KOA while excluding patients with bilateral knee replacements, trauma within 6 weeks, or concurrent rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, gout, pseudogout, or bursitis.  From this cohort we found 702 who met criteria (191 patients seen by rheumatology, 162 by orthopedics, 198 by sports medicine, 132 by physiatry, and 20 by internal medicine).  We recorded BMIs, comorbidities, KOA characteristics, and KOA management including acetaminophen, NSAIDs/COX-2 inhibitors, physical therapy referrals, and intra-articular injections of steroids or hyaluronic acid (HA).  We analyzed differences in overall KOA treatment of non-obese vs. obese patients (BMI <30 vs ≥30 kg/m2), and between the 5 physician specialties regardless of patient BMI.

Results:   The resulting cohort of 702 patients had an overall mean BMI of 29.1 (±7).  The mean age was 60.5 (±14) with 75% females.  Surprisingly, we did not find any significant differences in KOA treatment of non-obese (BMI<30) vs obese patients when aggregating scores across physician specialties; this held true when comparing the non-obese with the morbidly obese (BMI>35).  Our data do suggest that rheumatologists recommend acetominophen for KOA far more often than do the combined cohort of orthopedists, physiatrists and sports medicine physicians (37% vs 3%, p<0.001); internists (at 43%) are even greater proponents of acetaminophen. We did not identify any significant difference between specialties in the percentage of KOA patients prescribed NSAIDs or COX-2 inhibitors, referrals to physical therapy, or the use of corticosteroid injections. With regards to HA, rheumatologists in our cohort inject less than orthopedists (17% vs 26%, p=0.06), sports medicine physicians (17% vs 30%, p=0.004), and physiatrists (17% vs 29%, p=0.02). We also found no reportable difference in specialty-specific KOA treatment between the BMI sub-groups.

 

Conclusion: In treating KOA, rheumatologists and internists are more likely to prescribe acetaminophen for KOA while orthopedists, sports medicine physicians, and physiatrists are more like to inject HA.  Despite preconceived bias, we did not identify significant differences in the KOA treatment of non-obese vs obese patients, in aggregate or within any of the subspecialties.  Nevertheless, identification of divergent treatment patterns between specialties warrants discussion to optimize algorithms across musculoskeletal care.


Disclosure: K. Forrester, None; F. Taufiq, None; J. Samuels, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Forrester K, Taufiq F, Samuels J. Comparison of Knee Osteoarthritis Treatment in the Non-Obese Versus Obese Populations Across Different Medical Specialties [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-knee-osteoarthritis-treatment-in-the-non-obese-versus-obese-populations-across-different-medical-specialties/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-knee-osteoarthritis-treatment-in-the-non-obese-versus-obese-populations-across-different-medical-specialties/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology