ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 093

Comparison Between Induction with Rituximab and Cyclophosphamide in Treatment of Childhood-Onset ANCA-Associated Vasculitis

Samuel Gagne1, Kimberly Morishita2, Else Bosman3, Vidya Sivaraman4, David Cabral5, For the PedVas Investigators6 and Brett Klamer7, 1Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, 2University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 3UBC, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 4Nationwide Children's Hospital/ The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 5BC Children's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 6PedVas, 7Biostatistics Resource at Nationwide Children’s Hospital (BRANCH), Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH

Meeting: 2023 Pediatric Rheumatology Symposium

Keywords: ANCA associated vasculitis, Outcome measures, Pediatric rheumatology

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Friday, March 31, 2023

Title: Posters: Clinical and Therapeutic II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 5:00PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) and microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) are a group vasculitides with significant morbidity and mortality requiring toxic therapy. Clinical trials in adults have identified rituximab (RTX) as being an effective alternative to cyclophosphamide (CYC) for remission induction. As disease rarity in children limits the feasibility of pediatric trials, treatment data has been extrapolated from adult studies although efficacy and toxicity may differ in children. Here, we evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of CYC versus RTX through pragmatic, registry-based comparative evaluation.

Methods: From ARChiVe, a registry of childhood vasculitis, we identified patients with MPA or GPA who received induction with either RTX or CYC. We compared outcomes including rate of infection or drug-related hospitalization at 6 months and rate of remission and Pediatric Vasculitis Damage Index (pVDI) at 6 & 12 months. Remission was defined as Pediatric Vasculitis Activity Score (PVAS) ≤ 2 (inactive or low disease activity). Regression analysis was used for comparative evaluation of outcomes.

Results: 104 patients (median age 14 years) were included (81% with GPA). 43% received RTX, 46% CYC, and 11% received both RTX and CYC. Ninety of 104 had 12-month follow-up data. Initial PVAS score, diagnosis, and age at onset were similar across treatment groups. Overall, 63% and 72% of patients achieved remission at 6 and 12 months, respectively. There was no significant difference between treatment groups (p >0.9). Patients treated with RTX had a slightly higher odds of remission at 6 months, but this was not statistically significant (OR 1.07, 95% CI: 0.45,2.52). Hospitalization occurred in 18%; 22% of patients on RTX versus 10% on CYC although this difference was not statistically significant (OR 2.29, 95% CI: 0.73,7.16). The median pVDI at 12 months was one in both groups; patients receiving RTX had a slightly higher odds of a greater VDI, but this was not statistically significant (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.47,2.36).

Conclusion: This is the first study comparing CYC and RTX for induction in pediatric GPA and MPA. No significant differences were shown between induction regimens with respect to rates of remission, severe adverse events, or degree of organ damage. Patients receiving RTX had more hospitalizations than those on CYC, but this was not statistically significant though there were a low number of hospitalizations overall. This study was limited by its sample size, retrospective nature, and lack of longitudinal adverse drug-related event data. Larger studies with longer follow-up are needed for increased precision in estimated differences between treatment regimens and reduction of uncontrolled confounding. These results represent an important early evaluation.

Supporting image 1Table 1: Patient Characteristics by Induction Medication


Disclosures: S. Gagne: None; K. Morishita: None; E. Bosman: None; V. Sivaraman: None; D. Cabral: None; F. PedVas Investigators: None; B. Klamer: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Gagne S, Morishita K, Bosman E, Sivaraman V, Cabral D, PedVas Investigators F, Klamer B. Comparison Between Induction with Rituximab and Cyclophosphamide in Treatment of Childhood-Onset ANCA-Associated Vasculitis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 4). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-between-induction-with-rituximab-and-cyclophosphamide-in-treatment-of-childhood-onset-anca-associated-vasculitis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2023 Pediatric Rheumatology Symposium

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-between-induction-with-rituximab-and-cyclophosphamide-in-treatment-of-childhood-onset-anca-associated-vasculitis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology