ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2693

Comparing Eight Year Clinical and Radiographic Outcome in Two Cohorts of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Maria LE Andersson1, Kristina Forslind2 and Ingiäld Hafström3, 1R&D Centre Spenshult,Halmstad, Halmstad, Sweden, 2Department of Medicine, Helsingborgs Lasarett, Section of Rheumatology, Helsingborg, Sweden, 3Rheumatology Dept, Karoliska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Clinical, longitudinal studies, radiography and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Clinical Aspects Poster Session III

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: To compare patient and disease characteristics over the first 8 years of disease in a large inception cohort of early RA patients included 1992 to 1999 and 2000 to 2006, respectively.

Methods: In all 1911 RA patients from the early BARFOT prospective multi-centre observational study, who had completed the 8 year follow-up, were recruited. All patients fulfilled the ACR 1987 criteria. The patients were divided into two groups, group 1 (N=928, 68% women) included 1992 to 1999 and group 2 (N=1010, 70% women) included 2000 to 2006. DAS28, VAS pain, HAQ and radiographs of the hands and feet scored by the van der Heijde modified Sharp method (SHS) were assessed during the 8 years. Statistical comparisons between groups were done by t-test and Chi2.

Results: At inclusion, the women in group 2 were, compared with those in group 1, older, mean (SD) 55 (15) vs 52 (14) years, p<0.001, were more frequently RF positive, 64% vs. 58%, p=0.031 and had worse radiographic score, mean total SHS (SD)  5 (9) vs 3 (6), p<0.001, whereas the men did not differ in these aspects.

Over time DAS28 decreased in both groups, and as from 6 months in men and 12 months in women the mean DAS28 was significantly lower in group 2 compared with group 1 and remained so during the 8 year follow-up. HAQ and VAS pain decreased similarly in the two groups with no differences between women at any time point. Men in group 1 had higher mean VAS pain at 6 months and at 2 years follow-up, with no differences between the groups at 8 years.

In both groups women and men progressed radiographically over 8 years, p<0.001 respectively. Women in group 1 had more progression than women in group 2, mean (SD) change SHS 20 (27) vs. 16 (20), p=0.009. In men there were no difference in mean change SHS over 8 years 16 (19) vs 14 (18), p=0.186.

The patients in group 1 started with methotrexate (MTX) in 26%, with sulphasalazine (SAL) in 30%, and with other DMARDs in 10%, the corresponding figures for group 2 were 61%, 19% and 3%. After 8 years patients in group 1 got MTX in 32%, combination therapy in 8% and biologics in 13%, in group 2 the corresponding figures were 40%, 7% and 26%.

Conclusion: Women diagnosed in the 2000s had higher disease activity, more pain and worse radiographic joint damage at inclusion than those diagnosed in the 1990s. They achieved lower disease activity and less radiographic progression over 8 years compared with the women included in the 1990s. This difference may reflect the more active medical treatment in the 2000s. Despite that, HAQ and pain did not differ between women in the two groups during follow-up.

Men diagnosed in the 2000s had higher disease activity and more tender joints at inclusion than those diagnosed in the 1990s. As for women disease activity decreased more in those diagnosed in the 2000s, though there was no difference in radiographic progression between the groups, neither in HAQ or pain reduction at the 8-yearfollow-up. HAQ and pain seems thus not solely depend on inflammatory activity or radiological damage in either gender.


Disclosure: M. L. Andersson, None; K. Forslind, None; I. Hafström, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Andersson ML, Forslind K, Hafström I. Comparing Eight Year Clinical and Radiographic Outcome in Two Cohorts of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparing-eight-year-clinical-and-radiographic-outcome-in-two-cohorts-of-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparing-eight-year-clinical-and-radiographic-outcome-in-two-cohorts-of-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology