ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0284

Compared Mortality and Cardiovascular Safety of JAK Inhibitors and Tocilizumab in Patients with RA : A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

Daniela Chicre1, Alisson Pugliesi1, Manoel Barros Bértolo1, Vani de Abreu Souza Filho1 and Luiz Sérgio F Carvalho2, 1Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil, 2Clarity: Inteligência em Saúde, Brasília, Brazil

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Cardiovascular, Heart disease, Mortality, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 12, 2022

Title: RA – Treatment Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: The ORAL-Surveillance trial showed important data on the comparative safety between Tofacitinib and TNF inhibitors (TNFi) in the treatment of RA, leading to safety concerns about JAK inhibitors. Little is known, however, about comparative safety data between other bDMARD non-TNFi or even JAKi other than Tofacitinib. Our aim was to compare the risk of all-cause death (ACD) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in individuals with RA treated with tocilizumab (TCZ) or JAK inhibitors (JAKi).

Methods:

Methods: We performed a systematic review within 6 medical databases until 1st June 2022 for phase 2-4 RCTs evaluating patients with RA treated with JAKi (Tofacitinib, Baricitinib or Upadacitinibe) or TCZ (intervention arm) compared to controls (TNFi or placebo). Study data were independently assessed by 3 investigators. We performed a network meta-analysis with additive and random effecs to evaluate the risk of MACE (primary outcome) and ACD (secondary outcome) compared to TNFi. We calculated posterior probability of increasing the primary and secondary outcomes following Bayes’ Theorem.

Results: The meta-analysis included 19 RCTs, with 19,074 patients and 54,713 patients-years. TCZ and JAKi were linked to non statistically significant increase in the risk of MACE as compared to TNFi (ORs of 1.0669 [95%CI 0.7896; 1.4414; p=0.673] and 1.2712 [0.8970; 1.8014]; p=0.177], respectively [I2 = 0%]), whereas the posterior probabilities of increasing MACE by 15% or more were 21% and 83%. TCZ and JAKi were also linked to non statistically significant increase in the risk of ACD as compared to TNFi (ORs of 1.3526 [0.6283; 2.9117; p=0.44] and 1.2044 [0.5611; 2.5852; p=0.633], respectively [I2 = 9%]), with posterior probabilities of increasing ACD by 15% or more were 81% and 61%.

Conclusion:

Conclusion: This meta-analysis found a substatial probability ( >60%) that JAKi increase the risk of MACE and ACD, and that TCZ increase risk of ACD compared to TNFi. Our results reinforce the need for new clinical trials of comparative safety between IJAK, TNFi and non-TNF bDMARD.


Disclosures: D. Chicre, None; A. Pugliesi, AbbVie/Abbott, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), Eli Lilly, Boehringer-Ingelheim, UCB, Janssen; M. Barros Bértolo, None; V. de Abreu Souza Filho, None; L. F Carvalho, AbbVie/Abbott, Amgen, Roche, NovoNordisk, libbs, AstraZeneca.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Chicre D, Pugliesi A, Barros Bértolo M, de Abreu Souza Filho V, F Carvalho L. Compared Mortality and Cardiovascular Safety of JAK Inhibitors and Tocilizumab in Patients with RA : A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/compared-mortality-and-cardiovascular-safety-of-jak-inhibitors-and-tocilizumab-in-patients-with-ra-a-systematic-review-and-network-meta-analysis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/compared-mortality-and-cardiovascular-safety-of-jak-inhibitors-and-tocilizumab-in-patients-with-ra-a-systematic-review-and-network-meta-analysis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology