ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1923

Co-fluctuations of Knee Pain Between Knees in the Same Person: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI)

Martin Englund1, Tuhina Neogi2 and Aleksandra Turkiewicz1, 1Lund University, Lund, Sweden, 2Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Cohort Study, Epidemiology, Osteoarthritis, pain

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2022

Title: Osteoarthritis – Clinical Poster

Session Type: Poster Session D

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: Pain in knee osteoarthritis (OA) is often known to fluctuate. However, there is limed knowledge of the pain fluctuations in between knees within the same person. Our aims were: 1) To estimate to what degree knee pain co-fluctuates in two knees within the same person. 2) Identify persons who have high degree of co-fluctuation indicative of systemic reasons of pain, and persons with more distinct pain patterns in each knee suggesting local reasons for pain.

Methods: We included 3310 subjects from OAI incidence or progression cohorts with non-missing values of pain in last 7 days (NRS range 0 to 10) at each annual follow-up between baseline and 5 years in both knees. To evaluate changes in pain in each knee, we created a new variable, change in NRS pain over 1 year of follow-up. Then, we calculated the absolute difference in change per year between two knees within a person. Using group trajectory modeling, allowing for polynomial shape of the trajectories, we identified clusters of persons with similar trajectories of change in pain over time in both knees, and those with knee-specific trajectories of change. We evaluated 2 to 6 groups and selected a 4-group solution based on acceptable out-of-sample (20% of the whole study sample) group membership posterior probabilities with mean of at least ~0.8 for all groups and group sizes of at least 5% of the study sample.

Results: The knee pain was similar across all follow-up time points (apart from baseline that had higher proportion of persons reporting pain) and very similar between right and left knees. At each follow-up, for ~40% of knees, participants reported no pain. Among knees with pain, the mean pain levels over 5 years ranged 3.7-4.0 (SD 2.2-2.3) in right knee and 3.9-4.1 (SD 2.3-2.4) in the left knee. 185 persons had no knee pain in either knee during the follow-up and were thus excluded from further analysis. During each 1-year follow-up time, ~50% reported changes in pain in both knees that were the same or differed by 1 NRS point only. ~30% reported changes in pain that differed by 2-3 NRS points between two knees within one person. ~20% of participants reported annual change in pain level that differed >4 NRS points between the two knees. We found 4 groups with distinct patterns of within-person changes in knee pain over time.(Figure 1). Group 1: 10% of persons reported essentially the same changes in pain for both knees and practically the same levels of pain. Group 2: 77% of persons reported similar magnitude of changes in both knees, even if having often different levels of pain in each knee. Groups 3 and 4: 13% had different changes in pain between the knees – where in one subgroup (6%) the two knees converge to become more similar, while in the other subgroup (7%) the two knees diverge over time to become different. Mean age was similar between the 4 groups, but sex distribution was markedly different, with relatively more male participants reporting similar pain in both knees. Those with same pattern of change in both knees were also more often from the progression cohort. (Table 1)

Conclusion: As many as 85% of persons report similar fluctuations of pain in both knees. Only ~15% report distinct knee pain fluctuations in each knee. Systemic components of pain and use of pain medication may contribute.

Supporting image 1

Figure 1. Example trajectories of pain in two knees of one individual representative of 4 groups identified using group trajectory modeling. Group1: Same changes in both knees and similar pain levels. Group 2: Similar changes over time but possible different pain levels in each knee. Group 3: Changes in pain over time become more similar between knees. Group 4: Changes in pain over time become more different between knees.

Supporting image 2

Table 1. Descriptive characteristics.


Disclosures: M. Englund, None; T. Neogi, Novartis, Pfizer/Lilly, Regeneron; A. Turkiewicz, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Englund M, Neogi T, Turkiewicz A. Co-fluctuations of Knee Pain Between Knees in the Same Person: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/co-fluctuations-of-knee-pain-between-knees-in-the-same-person-data-from-the-osteoarthritis-initiative-oai/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/co-fluctuations-of-knee-pain-between-knees-in-the-same-person-data-from-the-osteoarthritis-initiative-oai/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology