ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0051

CD14+CD64+ Classical Monocytes Are the Main Producers of IL-23 at the Enthesis

Nicole McDermott1, Thomas Macleod1, Ala Altaie1, Liz Straszynski2, Robert Dunsmuir3, Vishal Borse3, Peter Loughenbury3, Davide Simone4, Stevephen Sansom4, Christopher Buckley4 and Dennis McGonagle5, 1University of Leeds, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, Leeds, United Kingdom, 2Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James’s, Leeds, United Kingdom, 3Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom, 4Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, Oxford, United Kingdom, 5Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Fc receptors, innate immunity, macrophages, Spondyloarthropathies

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 12, 2023

Title: (0040–0064) Innate Immunity Poster

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: IL-23 is a key cytokine involved in diseases such as psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis and spondyloarthropathies (SpA) and inflammatory bowel disease.IL-23 is produced by activated monocytes, dendritic cells and neutrophils. Guselkumab, IL-23 p19 subunit inhibitor binds to native FcR1 (CD64) but Risankizumab, another p19 blocker, has a mutated Fc domain and lacks this binding. Entheses are relatively avascular sites and may be difficult for antibody penetration and normal entheseal macrophages have inducible IL-23 protein expression. In this work we investigated the phenotype and functionality of normal and activated entheseal macrophages to explore CD64 expression and which monocyte population had predominant IL-23 expression.

Methods: Immune cell populations were flushed from spinous process; samples were obtained from patients undergoing surgery for spinal decompression with no known chronic inflammation. Cells are sorted into two populations CD64+ and CD64–, sorting was gated on live cell and CD3+ depleted. The populations that were sorted are CD64+CD14+CD16– and CD64–CD14–CD16+. Cells were cultured for 48hrs with LPS (100ng/ml) & IFN-γ (50ng/ml) and then assessed for IL-23 production by ELISA and cells phenotyped to assess their CD64 profile (N=4). Single cell sequencing has been performed on bone and soft tissue from the enthesis following collagenase digest and CD64 expression identified (N=4).

Results: Sorting profiles indicated that the CD64+ cells were CD14+CD16– and CD64– cells were CD14–CD16+, the enthesis showed some cells that are CD64+ have intermediate CD14 expression (Figure 1). Following 48hrs in culture cells maintained their respective CD64 expression profile confirming that CD64 expression does not fluctuate upon cell activation (Figure 2). Analysis of the supernatant reveals that IL-23 expression distinctly comes from the CD64+CD14+ cells from the enthesis and predominantly from the PBMCs following activation with LPS & IFN-γ (Figure 2). Single cell analysis confirms that CD64 expression is found on the conventional and inflammatory monocytes which makes up approximately 20% of the cell population and even in health a proportion of these cells had IL23A gene expression which encodes the P19 subunit (Figure 3).

Conclusion: In this work, we have shown that CD64+CD14+ conventional monocytes are the main producers of IL-23 at the axial enthesis. This has been confirmed by flow cytometry and single cell analysis showing that these make up approximately 20% of the total cell population. Given that the key entheseal cell producing IL-23 also expresses CD64, the receptor for the rapid removal of Guselkumab bound IL-23 at the enthesis. These findings highlight that there could be differences between Guselkumab and Risankizumab in IL-23 neutralisation at the key enthesis territory.

Supporting image 1

Figure 1: Gating strategy for sorting CD64+ and CD64- cells.
Cells flushed from the spinous process are stained for cell sorting using the panel of markers: Live/dead-Zombie Green, CD45-RF710, CD3-BUV395, CD14-BV605, CD16-PE-Cy7 & CD64-APC. The gating strategy uses FSC/SSC to remove the granulocytes and then gates on the live cells (A), from the live cell population the CD3+ cells are gated out (B) which we have shown previously to be CD64 negative. Cells are then separated by CD14 and CD16 (C), the CD64+ cells collected are CD14+ as shown in the bottom left plot and the CD64- cells are CD14- (D).

Supporting image 2

Figure 2: IL_23 production is from activated entheseal monocytes.
Sorting of entheseal CD64+ cells correlated with CD14 positivity and CD64- cells correlated with CD14 negativity (A), these two cell populations were put into culture for 48hrs stimulated with LPS (100ng/mL) and IFN-γ (50ng/mL) or with no stimulation. After 48hrs in culture CD64 profiles were reassessed by flow cytometry (B), from both CD64+ and CD64- populations, expression was compared to a CD64 FMO. Supernatants collected after 48hrs were assessed via ELISA to measure the levels of IL_23 N=4 (C), each of the four donors was plotted and shows levels of IL_23 for each condition follows the same trend (D).

Supporting image 3

Figure 3: Singe-cell sequencing reveals gene expression for FCGR1A/B and IL23A is only present in the monocyte populations.
Single-cell sequencing was performed on spinal entheseal bone and soft tissue, samples were prepared by performing a collagenase digest. Bone and soft tissue were analysed, and cluster analysis reveals that the FGR1A and FCGR2A genes which encode for CD64 are present in approximately 20% of the conventional and inflammatory monocytes, this also correlates with expression of the IL23A gene encoding for IL_23 N=4. Together this data confirms what has been seen at the protein level.


Disclosures: N. McDermott: None; T. Macleod: None; A. Altaie: None; L. Straszynski: None; R. Dunsmuir: None; V. Borse: None; P. Loughenbury: None; D. Simone: None; S. Sansom: None; C. Buckley: None; D. McGonagle: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Celgene, 2, 5, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, Merck, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, UCB, 2, 5, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

McDermott N, Macleod T, Altaie A, Straszynski L, Dunsmuir R, Borse V, Loughenbury P, Simone D, Sansom S, Buckley C, McGonagle D. CD14+CD64+ Classical Monocytes Are the Main Producers of IL-23 at the Enthesis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/cd14cd64-classical-monocytes-are-the-main-producers-of-il-23-at-the-enthesis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/cd14cd64-classical-monocytes-are-the-main-producers-of-il-23-at-the-enthesis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology