ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1479

CD14, a Toll-like Receptor Co-Factor, Influences Osteoclast Differentiation and Activity, but Does Not Alter Osteoblastic Potential of Bone-Marrow Precursors in Mice

Jerahme Martinez, Vu Nguyen, Cheng Zhou, George Dodge and Carla Scanzello, University of Pennsylvania, philadelphia, PA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Bone Resorption, innate immunity, Osteoarthritis, osteoclastogenesis, pain

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 9, 2021

Title: Osteoarthritis & Joint Biology – Basic Science Poster (1468–1479)

Session Type: Poster Session D

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Changes in subchondral bone structure (SCB) occur in osteoarthritis (OA), and are visible by imaging as subchondral sclerosis on radiographs, and bone marrow lesions (BMLs) by MRI. These changes are the result of active bone remodeling that occurs in OA. BMLs are correlated with pain in OA patients. We previously demonstrated that bone remodeling was significantly reduced after joint injury in mice deficient in CD14. CD14 enhances Toll-like receptor (TLR) mediated inflammation by acting as a co-receptor for multiple TLRs, increasing TLR sensitivity to damage associated molecular patterns (DAMPS) to activate proinflammatory signaling pathways. Soluble CD14 (sCD14), TLRs, and DAMPs (TLR ligands) are all elevated in OA, and sCD14 has been implicated as a biomarker of symptom and structural severity in OA. Increasing evidence suggests TLR signaling influences bone remodeling as well, through activation of osteoclast precursor cells, but the specific role of CD14 on this process is unknown. Here, we investigate the potential mechanism by which CD14 influences bone remodeling through in vitro analysis of osteoclastogenic and osteoblastic potential.

Methods: Bone marrow (BM) hematopoietic and mesenchymal precursors were isolated from long bones of male wild-type C57BL/6 (WT) and CD14-deficient (CD14-/-) mice (12 weeks). BM cells flushed from long bones were cultured for 1 day to separate non-adherent from adherent population. Osteoclast differentiation (non-adherent cells) was stimulated by M-CSF and RANKL for 5 days. Osteoblastic cultures (adherent cells) were stimulated with β-glycerophosphate, ascorbic acid, and Dexamethasone for 19 days. Osteoclasts were identified as TRAP-positive multinucleated cells. Osteoclast activity was assessed by resorption assays on bone slices and toluidine blue staining. Osteoblast cultures were stained with Alizarin red to detect mineralization. RT-qPCR analysis was performed to detect mRNA levels of osteoclast (calcitonin receptor/CTR and cathepsin K/Ctsk) and osteoblast (osteopontin/OPN and osteocalcin/BLAP) differentiation markers.

Results: CD14-/- BM cells had reduced number of TRAP positive and multinucleated cells (p = 0.01; Fig. 1 A-D) and reduced Ctsk mRNA (p = 0.03; Fig. 1 E&F), compared to WT. CD14-/- cells showed a 50% reduction in resorption activity compared to WT (Fig. 1 G-I). No significant differences were observed between strains in osteoblastic potential measured by mineralization and mRNA levels of osteoblastic markers (Fig. 2).

Conclusion: CD14-/- BM precursor cells have reduced capacity to differentiate into osteoclasts, while osteoblastic potential is retained. This suggests that the reduced capacity of CD14-/- osteoclastic cells may impact bone remodeling in response to joint injury by disrupting the balance between resorption and formation. Future experiments will determine the influence of DAMPs relevant to OA pathogenesis on osteoclastogenesis, and the density of osteoclasts and precursors in SCB after injury. These experiments will lead to a better understanding CD14/ TLR signaling in SCB remodeling following joint injury and OA, and the potential for CD14 blockade to prevent pathologic bone remodeling in disease.

Representative TRAP staining from (A) wild type mice and (B) CD14-/- mice. (C) TRAP positive cells and (D) multinucleated cells quantitated by automated image analysis using ImageJ software. mRNA for CTR (E) and Ctsk (F) quantitated by qPCR. (G) Osteoclast activity was assayed by quantifying the (H) number of resorption pits and (I) resorption area on bone slices stained with toluidine blue.

(A&B) Alizarin Red staining of WT and CD14-/- BMMSCs after differentiation. No differences were observed between strains. This was confirmed by measuring mRNA levels of osteoblastic markers, (C) osteopontin and (D) osteocalcin.


Disclosures: J. Martinez, None; V. Nguyen, None; C. Zhou, None; G. Dodge, None; C. Scanzello, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Martinez J, Nguyen V, Zhou C, Dodge G, Scanzello C. CD14, a Toll-like Receptor Co-Factor, Influences Osteoclast Differentiation and Activity, but Does Not Alter Osteoblastic Potential of Bone-Marrow Precursors in Mice [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/cd14-a-toll-like-receptor-co-factor-influences-osteoclast-differentiation-and-activity-but-does-not-alter-osteoblastic-potential-of-bone-marrow-precursors-in-mice/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/cd14-a-toll-like-receptor-co-factor-influences-osteoclast-differentiation-and-activity-but-does-not-alter-osteoblastic-potential-of-bone-marrow-precursors-in-mice/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology