ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1949

CB2 Receptor Distribution and Effects of LenabasumTM in Dermatomyositis In Vitro

Spandana Maddukuri1, Jay Patel2, Christina Bax3, Maria Wysocka3 and Victoria Werth4, 1University of Pennsylvania and the Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Montville, NJ, 2University of Pennsylvania and the Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, 3University of Pennsylvania, Department of Dermatology, Philadelphia, 4University of Pennsylvania and Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Administration Hospital, Philadelphia

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: autoimmune diseases, Dendritic cells, dermatomyositis, interferon, T Cell

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2020

Title: Cytokines & Cell Trafficking (1948–1952)

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 3:00PM-3:50PM

Background/Purpose: Dermatomyositis (DM) patients report poor quality of life due to disease activity and persistent itch. Lenabasum is an oral non-immunosuppressive, non-psychoactive cannabinoid type 2 receptor (CB2R) reverse agonist being investigated for use in DM. Our previous studies showed increased IFNγ in DM compared to healthy controls (HC) and a decrease in IFNγ as a result of Lenabasum use. Literature also suggests upregulation of CB2R in the presence of IFNγ. The purpose of our study is to investigate the distribution of CB2R among immune cells in DM blood/skin and the in vitro effects of Lenabasum on these immune cells.

Methods: Image mass cytometry (IMC) was used on 5 HC and 10 DM patients; biopsies were stained with 37 cell markers and 1mmx2mm regions were ablated using the Hyperion Imaging System. Cells were segmented using a nuclear app-based algorithm in Visiopharm. Per cell mean pixel intensity analysis was done with histoCAT. The Phenograph algorithm was used to cluster cells based on expression of cell markers. FC was used on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) isolated from 6 HC and 7 DM patients and on eluted skin cells from 9 DM biopsies. Cells (1×106/mL) were stimulated with PMA/Ionomycin/Brefeldin A or Resiquimod/Brefeldin A if they were being stained for T cells or myeloid dendritic cells (mDCs) and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDC), respectively. For in vitro experiments, samples were treated with Lenabasum (0, 10, or 20μM) for 1 hour before stimulation. Samples were acquired on a BD FACS CANTO and analyzed with FlowJo.

Results: We found that CB2R expression is higher in DM lesional skin compared to HC skin (p< 0.001). CB2R expression is upregulated on pDCs (p< 0.001), mDCs (p< 0.05) and CD4 T cells (p< 0.001) in DM skin compared to HC skin. When evaluating CB2R distribution among lymphocytes, dendritic cells, monocytes, macrophages, NK cells, and endothelial cells, pDCs were found to be major expressors followed by mDCs. FC results from eluted skin cells corroborated these findings, showing a greater percentage of pDCs (48.0% ± 21.4 ) expressing CB2R compared to mDCs (36.4% ± 10.9) and CD4 T cells (26.7% ± 6.9). FC results revealed lower expression of CB2R on DM PBMCs (1.8% ± 0.3) than in cells eluted from DM skin (37.0% ± 7.8) (p< 0.0001). There was no significant difference in CB2R expression in PBMCs between HC and DM CD4 T cells. No difference was noted between HC and DM CD8 T cells as well. Significantly greater CB2R expression was noted in PBMC mDCs (p=0.0167) and pDCs (p=0.0167) in DM compared to HC, but CB2R expression on mDCs and pDCs in the periphery was about 12-fold and 18-fold lower than that of skin cells, respectively. Preliminary in vitro experiments examined Lenabasum’s effects on T cells in the blood. A significant decrease in IFNγ production by lenabasum-treated DM CD8 T cells compared to lenabasum-untreated DM CD8 T cells was noted (p=0.0207). No significant decrease in IFNγ production was observed in DM CD4 T cells or HC CD4 or HC CD8 T cells.

Conclusion: We found that CB2R expression differs between the skin and blood of DM patients, with higher expression occurring in skin. pDCs were found to be major expressors of CB2R in DM skin through IMC and FC, suggesting that these cells may be most affected by Lenabasum in DM.  

(a) Image mass cytometry findings show that CB2R is significantly upregulated in lesional DM skin compared to HC skin. Mean pixel intensity of CB2R expression is highest on (b) pDCs. CB2R expression in lesional DM skin when compared to HC skin is greater on (b) pDCs, (c) mDCs, and (d) CD4 T cells. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001

(a) Flow cytometry results from eluted DM skin cells show highest CB2R expression on pDCs (48.0% ± 21.4), followed by mDCs (36.4% ± 10.9) and CD4 T cells (26.7% ± 6.9). Skin CD8 T cells could not be analyzed because the population was too small. (b) Flow cytometry on HC and DM PBMCs shows significantly higher expression of CB2R in mDCs (p=0.0167) and pDCs (p=0.0167) in DM compared to HC. No significant difference in CB2R expression was noted in CD4 and CD8 T cells from PBMCs (b). Overall, CB2R expression is higher in eluted skin cells compared to PBMCs.

In vitro experiments in stimulated PBMCs treated with Lenabasum show no significant decreases in IFNg production in (a) HC CD4 T cells, (b) HC CD8 T cells, and (c) DM CD4 T cells. There was a significant decrease in IFNg production in (d) DM CD8 T cells treated with 20uM compared to 0uM (p=0.0207).


Disclosure: S. Maddukuri, None; J. Patel, None; C. Bax, None; M. Wysocka, None; V. Werth, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, 2, Biogen, 2, 5, Resolve, 2, CSL Behring, 5, Regeneron, 5, Argenx, 5, Viela Bio, 2, 5, Principia, 5, Lilly, 5, Abbvie, 5, AstraZeneca, 2, 5, Amgen, 5, Kyowa Kirin, 5, Glaxo Smith Kline, 5, Cugene, 5, Celgene, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Gilead, 2, 5, Genentech, 2, 5, Syntimmune, 2, MedImmune, 5, Idera, 5, BMS, 5, Medscape, 5, Nektar, 5, Incyte, 5, EMD Sorona, 5, Crisalis, 5, Octapharma, 5, University of Pennsylvania, 9.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Maddukuri S, Patel J, Bax C, Wysocka M, Werth V. CB2 Receptor Distribution and Effects of LenabasumTM in Dermatomyositis In Vitro [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/cb2-receptor-distribution-and-effects-of-lenabasumtm-in-dermatomyositis-in-vitro/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/cb2-receptor-distribution-and-effects-of-lenabasumtm-in-dermatomyositis-in-vitro/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology