ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2087

Association of MRI-Defined Structure Features at Baseline with Knee Pain and Function Trajectories: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI)

Shen Liu1, Thang Doung2, Yong Ge3, Xiaoxiao Sun4, Yvonne Golightly5, Amanda Nelson6, Tuhina Neogi7, Jeffery Duryea8 and Kent Kwoh9, and Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) and Pivotal Osteoarthritis MRI Analyses (POMA) investigators, 1Department of Biostatistics, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 2Department of Computer Science, University of Arizona College of Science, Tucson, AZ, 3Department of Information Sciences, Eller College of Manangement, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 4Department of Biostatistics, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 5University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 6University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 7Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 8Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 9University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: cartilage, functional status, Osteoarthritis, Outcome measures, pain

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 18, 2024

Title: Osteoarthritis – Clinical Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Characterizing knee symptom (i.e., pain and function) trajectories and understanding differences among symptom trajectories have the potential to promote the development of customized treatment and management plans for patients. We sought to identify diverse knee symptom trajectories in the OAI and to investigate potential associations between baseline MRI structural changes and distinct temporal knee symptom phenotypes.

Methods: We used data from the OAI and employed a two-stage strategy. In Stage 1, we identified knees with at least one of four symptom scores equal to 0 at baseline: WOMAC function score (0-68, none to extreme functional limitation), WOMAC pain score (0-20, none to extreme pain), KOOS knee pain frequency (0-4, none to daily), and the Numerical Rating Scale for knee pain severity (0-10, none to worst pain). We employed group-based multiple-trajectory modeling (GBMTM) to cluster the selected knees into distinct knee pain/function progression trajectories. In Stage 2, we utilized logistic regression models to examine the relationship between the Group 3 knee symptom trajectory identified in Stage 1 vs. Group 1 and Group 2 combined into a reference group, and various MRI-defined features independently, including bone marrow lesions (BMLs), cartilage surface damage, cartilage depth damage, Hoffa-synovitis, and effusion-synovitis (ES), as per the MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS), in separate models, including age, gender, race, and BMI. The Stage 2 analysis was based on a subsample size of 881 knees for which MOAKS readings were available.

Results: Overall, 3066 knees met our Stage 1 inclusion criteria. Three distinct knee symptom phenotypes were generated by GBMTM (Figure 1): Group 1 (1321 knees) was a non-progressive trajectory; Group 2 (1192 knees) was a slowly progressive trajectory; and Group 3 (553 knees) was a rapid progression trajectory. The forest plot of odds ratios (ORs) for the unadjusted results showed that higher scores for BMLs, effusion-synovitis, cartilage surface damage, cartilage depth damage and higher BMI were associated with the rapid symptom progression phenotype (Figure 2). The forest plot of ORs for the adjusted logistic regression showed that each unit increase in total BML size score corresponded to an OR of 1.20 (95% CI: 1.09, 1.33) for Group 3 vs. Groups 1 and 2; ≥ 2 regions with cartilage surface damage corresponded to an OR of 1.59 (95% CI; 1.12, 2.26).  There was a suggestion that advancing age was associated with a lower likelihood of being classified in the fast progression phenotype.

Conclusion: We delineated three distinct knee symptom phenotypes using longitudinal OAI data extending over ten years. Our findings revealed consistent knee symptom trajectories across all four distinct knee symptom measurements. The presence of MRI structural abnormalities (i.e., BMLs and cartilage damage) in the absence of pain or functional limitations may serve as indicators of rapid knee symptom development. Subgroups of patients who have worse knee symptom trajectories may be in greatest need for treatment, while those with minimal or mild symptom trajectories may not need treatment.

Supporting image 1

The selection of knees was based on at least one of four symptom scores equal to 0 at baseline: Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score for severity, KOOS knee pain frequency score, WOMAC disability score, or WOMAC pain score. The average trajectory (solid line) is shown; dashed lines represent the confidence intervals. The respective multi-trajectory simultaneous results for each of the four symptom measures are shown in each panel.

Supporting image 2

Male sex and non-Hispanics Whites were the referent groups.
Hoffa-synovitis (0, 1 as the referent group), and effusion-synovitis (ES, (0, 1 as the referent group); bone marrow lesions (BMLs, sum of size scores in 15 sub-regions); cartilage surface damage (>= 2 of 14 sub-regions with more than 10% of surface area of the sub-region with cartilage loss), cartilage depth damage (>= 2 of 14 sub-regions with more than 10% of surface area of the sub-region with full-thickness cartilage loss), as graded by the MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS)


Disclosures: S. Liu: None; T. Doung: None; Y. Ge: None; X. Sun: None; Y. Golightly: None; A. Nelson: MedScape Education, 6, NestleHealth, 6; T. Neogi: Amgen, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, Novartis, 2, Sobi, 2; J. Duryea: None; K. Kwoh: Cumberland, 5, Express Scripts, 2, Kiniska, 5, Kolon Tissue Gene, 12, Independent Data Monitoring Committee, Mindera, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Liu S, Doung T, Ge Y, Sun X, Golightly Y, Nelson A, Neogi T, Duryea J, Kwoh K. Association of MRI-Defined Structure Features at Baseline with Knee Pain and Function Trajectories: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/association-of-mri-defined-structure-features-at-baseline-with-knee-pain-and-function-trajectories-data-from-the-osteoarthritis-initiative-oai/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/association-of-mri-defined-structure-features-at-baseline-with-knee-pain-and-function-trajectories-data-from-the-osteoarthritis-initiative-oai/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology