ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0320

Assessment of Implementation of Treat to Target Concept Using Validated Composite Scores in Psoriatic Arthritis Patients

Tal Gazitt1, Muhanad Abu Elhija1, Amir Haddad1, Idit Lavi1, Muna Elias1 and Devy Zisman1, 1Carmel Hospital, Haifa, Israel

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Comorbidity, Disease Activity, Patient reported outcomes, Psoriatic arthritis, quality of care

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Friday, November 6, 2020

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster I: Psoriatic Arthritis

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: To assess the implementation of the “Treat-to-Target” (T2T) concept using validated composite disease activity scores in daily management of psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 117 consecutive PsA patient visits during 2016-2017 was performed including patient demographics, clinical disease parameters used in the Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) and Disease Activity Index for PSoriatic Arthritis  (DAPSA) composite scores, medication use, comorbidities including osteoarthritis (OA) and fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS)  and treatment changes as recorded by the treating physicians.  Medical records were reviewed to assess whether T2T concept was implemented.    All associations were assessed using Chi square test, or Students’ t-test, as appropriate.  Pearson’s correlation, McNemar and Cohen’s kappa measures test were used to evaluate association and agreement between MDA and DAPSA parameters. 

Results: Patient visits with complete data for MDA and DAPSA (116 and 114 visits, respectively) were analyzed with mean age 58.4±13 years, 65.5% women.  T2T approach was implemented in 76 (65.5%) and 74 (64.9%) patient visits using MDA and DAPSA, respectively (Pearson’s correlation -0.695). There was no correlation between T2T implementation and patient age, gender, alcohol and tobacco use, disease activity parameters and the various treatment regimens chosen. Physician assessment of disease activity and treatment changes did not correlate with the MDA score in 40 (34.5%) patients.  In 30 of these cases (75%), the MDA status was over-estimated due to disregard of patient reported outcomes (PRO).  Underestimation of the MDA status occurred in 10 cases (25%) and could be attributed to treatment changes made in patients having < 2 active joints or entheses.  Underestimation of disease activity using DAPSA score occurred in 22 (19.3%) patients and could be attributed to disregarding tender joint count, patient pain visual analogue scale and C-reactive protein level.   The co-existence of FMS or OA was associated with worse DAPSA scores in PsA patients (p=0.031, p=0.026, respectively), but did not affect MDA status.  Achieving disease remission as a goal using the MDA score was more difficult compared to the use of the DAPSA score (Cohen’s kappa=0.489).     

Conclusion: In our cohort, T2T concept was implemented in about 65% of patients.  The main obstacle observed in T2T implementation was the lack of use of validated, practical disease activity scores such as MDA or DAPSA and physicians’ overlooking “subjective” components of these scores in daily practice.  Efforts should be made in order to increase physician reliance and use of validated composite scores in PsA patient management.


Disclosure: T. Gazitt, None; M. Abu Elhija, None; A. Haddad, None; I. Lavi, None; M. Elias, None; D. Zisman, Pfizer, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Gazitt T, Abu Elhija M, Haddad A, Lavi I, Elias M, Zisman D. Assessment of Implementation of Treat to Target Concept Using Validated Composite Scores in Psoriatic Arthritis Patients [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/assessment-of-implementation-of-treat-to-target-concept-using-validated-composite-scores-in-psoriatic-arthritis-patients/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/assessment-of-implementation-of-treat-to-target-concept-using-validated-composite-scores-in-psoriatic-arthritis-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology