ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1816

Assessing Urate Deposition and Inflammation in the Vasculature of Gout Patients Using Dual Energy Computed Tomography and Positron Emission Tomography Pre and Post Pegloticase- a Pilot Study

Ira Khanna, Venkatesh Mani, Renata Pyzik, Audrey Kaufman, Wei Wei Chi, Emilia Bagiella, Philip Robson and Yousaf Ali, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Cardiovascular, gout, Imaging

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2022

Title: Metabolic and Crystal Arthropathies – Basic and Clinical Science Poster

Session Type: Poster Session D

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: Gout is the most common inflammatory arthritis, caused by hyperuricemia and subsequent deposition of aggregated monosodium urate (MSU) crystals in both articular and extra-articular regions. A strong association exists between hyperuricemia, gout and risk of cardiovascular disease. CT (DECT) has been shown to detect MSU deposition in vasculature of gout patients with correlation of tophus volume with cardiovascular risk. Vascular Positron Emission Tomography (PET/CT) has been extensively validated to measure arterial vessel wall inflammation. We postulate that uric acid deposits in the vasculature may cause local vascular inflammation. This could be a mechanism involved in theprogression of atherosclerosis and facilitate early onset of adverse cardiovascular events.

Methods: Ten patients with tophaceous gout who were either intolerant or refractory to urate lowering therapy were recruited. Patients were pre-treated with low dose immunomodulator (Azathioprine or Methotrexate) to prevent formation of anti-pegloticase antibodies and then were treated with pegloticase infusions every two weeks for 6 months. DECT and PET/CT were done at baseline and after 6 months of pegloticase to detect vascular MSU deposition (MSU volume) and vessel wall inflammation (Standard uptake value, SUV mean to assess systemic uptake across a vessel segment, SUV max to identify hotspots; Target-to-blood pool ratio, TBR mean and TBR max calculated by dividing the vascular wall SUV with the venous blood pool SUV mean, to correct for blood uptake) respectively. Data were summarized using means and standard deviations. Comparisons of the baseline and follow-up values were conducted for each variable using mixed effect models.

Results: We found a statistically significant decrease in SUV mean (p=0.0003) and SUV max (p=0.0090) across all arteries studied after treatment with pegloticase. There was a trend for decrease in TBR mean and TBR max, which was not statistically significant. In terms of MSU deposition, we found a trend for decrease in MSU volume after treatment with pegloticase, which was not statistically significant.

Conclusion: We observed a statistically significant reduction in vessel wall inflammation (SUV mean and SUV max) along with a trend towards a decrease in MSU deposition (MSU volume) in tophaceous gout patients following treatment with pegloticase. Despite the small sample size of our study, we were able to demonstrate a decrease in both vessel wall inflammation and MSU deposition by aggressively lowering uric acid. These findings suggest a role of MSU in vascular inflammation and demonstrate a concomitant decrease in vessel inflammation as the serum urate level is depleted. It remains to be seen if this correlates to a decrease in adverse cardiovascular outcome.

Supporting image 1

Figure 1- Bar charts showing decrease in MSU volume after treatment with Pegloticase (p=0.75), and decrease in SUV mean after treatment with Pegloticase (p=0.0003)

Supporting image 2

Figure 2- Representative PET/CT (left) and DECT images (right) from two axial locations in one patient. FDG uptake (orange overlay) shows inflammation in (A) the right iliac artery and (B) abdominal aorta (green arrow). On DECT, MSU deposits (green) are shown in the corresponding vessel walls (cross-hairs), with bone shown purple. In these locations, imaging shows a decrease in FDG uptake and MSU volume following treatment with Pegloticase.

Supporting image 3

Table 1- Results of mixed-effects-model analysis. Positive difference (Baseline-Follow up) represents decrease in value at follow up. We observed a statistically significant decrease in SUVmean (p=0.0003) and SUVmax (p=0.0090) at follow up and a trend towards decrease in TBRmean, TBRmax and MSU volume at follow up (not statistically significant).


Disclosures: I. Khanna, None; V. Mani, None; R. Pyzik, None; A. Kaufman, None; W. Chi, None; E. Bagiella, None; P. Robson, None; Y. Ali, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Khanna I, Mani V, Pyzik R, Kaufman A, Chi W, Bagiella E, Robson P, Ali Y. Assessing Urate Deposition and Inflammation in the Vasculature of Gout Patients Using Dual Energy Computed Tomography and Positron Emission Tomography Pre and Post Pegloticase- a Pilot Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/assessing-urate-deposition-and-inflammation-in-the-vasculature-of-gout-patients-using-dual-energy-computed-tomography-and-positron-emission-tomography-pre-and-post-pegloticase-a-pilot-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/assessing-urate-deposition-and-inflammation-in-the-vasculature-of-gout-patients-using-dual-energy-computed-tomography-and-positron-emission-tomography-pre-and-post-pegloticase-a-pilot-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology