ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1597

Arthritis Patient Perspectives on Virtual Care for People Living with Arthritis During the COVID-19 Pandemic and for the Future

Maya Joshi1, Anita Chan1, Adriana Lima2, Kelly Lendvoy1, Eric Sayre2 and Cheryl Koehn1, 1Arthritis Consumer Experts, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2Arthritis Research Canada, Richmond, BC, Canada

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Access to care, Health policy, Health Services Research, Qualitative Research, Surveys

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 9, 2021

Title: Patient Outcomes, Preferences, & Attitudes Poster IV: COVID-19 (1589–1613)

Session Type: Poster Session D

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Virtual Care (VC) is the delivery of health care services and information by electronic methods (video, smartphones, email, text) and may support arthritis patients in seeing their health care providers in a timely and convenient way. Arthritis Consumer Experts (ACE) conducted an online survey as little is known about arthritis patients’ views and preferences on VC.

Methods: ACE conducted a 23-question online survey (Jan. 20-Feb. 9, 2021) of people with a physician-diagnosed arthritis in English and French. Respondents answered questions on their experiences with in-person and VC services from a health care provider pre-March 2020 and between March 2020-January 2021, their preferences and satisfaction with those services, and the importance of VC availability in the future. Data were analysed in aggregate (including incomplete survey responses). McNemar’s test of agreement between time points was performed to compare pre-COVID to during COVID to (anticipated) post-COVID. Chi-square tests (exact tests where possible) were used to test for associations.

Results: 253 responses were analyzed. Demographics: 79% were women; 50% had disease less than 10 yrs; 47% rheumatoid arthritis; 19% osteoarthritis; 13% lupus; 8% psoriatic arthritis; 4% ankylosing spondylitis; 66% lived in urban communities; 5.1% identified as Black, Indigenous or a person of colour (BIPOC). Use of VC: 59% of respondents reported accessing VC pre-pandemic increasing to 88% during the pandemic. 85% were satisfied with sharing health concerns and getting advice using VC. Challenges accessing VC: 32% of respondents reported they were unable to receive arthritis specific VC at a time they felt they needed it during the pandemic. 75% reported it was either very important, important or somewhat important to continue having access to VC when the pandemic ends. 16% faced certain difficulties using VC. Inequities in VC: 12% of respondents who identified as non-BIPOC versus 46% of respondents who identified as BIPOC reported difficulties using VC. 7% of white respondents compared to 39% of BIPOC respondents reported feeling uncomfortable or not knowing how to use the VC technology used by their health care provider. Timeliness of VC: 15% of respondents reported they were unable to get any arthritis healthcare services in-person since March 2020 while 5% were not able to get any arthritis healthcare services virtually.

Conclusion: This community-led survey shows overall patient satisfaction with VC before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. 66% of respondents reported their preference for both in-person and VC services, with a preference of in-person for more complex examinations such as joint counts, and VC to augment care (between in-person visits or to support patient self-care). BIPOC with arthritis were more likely to experience factors that made it difficult to use VC and less likely to be very satisfied with their experiences. BIPOC were more likely to report “I don’t feel comfortable” or “know how to use the VC technology being used by my health care provider (38.5% for BIPOC vs 6.7% for white patients; p value < 0.01)”. The underrepresentation of BIPOC respondents in this survey suggests their lack of inclusion in arthritis patient organization networks.

Respondent Demographics

Access to VC before, during and after COVID_19, by type of care

Difficulties, satisfaction and access inequities to VC


Disclosures: M. Joshi, None; A. Chan, None; A. Lima, None; K. Lendvoy, None; E. Sayre, None; C. Koehn, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Joshi M, Chan A, Lima A, Lendvoy K, Sayre E, Koehn C. Arthritis Patient Perspectives on Virtual Care for People Living with Arthritis During the COVID-19 Pandemic and for the Future [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/arthritis-patient-perspectives-on-virtual-care-for-people-living-with-arthritis-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-and-for-the-future/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/arthritis-patient-perspectives-on-virtual-care-for-people-living-with-arthritis-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-and-for-the-future/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology