ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1080

Are Minority Populations Truly Vaccine Hesitant? A Provider-Based Approach to RSV Vaccine Uptake Suggests Otherwise.

pavana sakhamuri1, Stephen Lindsey2, Cathryn Leggio3 and Ellen Mire4, 1LSUHSC, Dept of Rheumatology, Lafayette, LA, 2LSUHSC, Dept of Rheumatology, NEW ORLEANS, LA, 3University Medical center, NEW ORLEANS, LA, 4LSUHSC, Dept of Medicine, NEW ORLEANS, LA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Access to care, autoimmune diseases, comparative effectiveness, Disparities, Education

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 27, 2025

Title: (1055–1087) Healthcare Disparities in Rheumatology Posters

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) is a leading cause of hospitalization and mortality in older adults and young children, particularly those with chronic illnesses or immunocompromising conditions (IC). Patients with rheumatic diseases (RD) are at increased risk for severe RSV infection. Three RSV vaccines (RSVPreF3, RSVPreF1, and mResvia) were approved by the FDA in May 2023 for individuals aged ≥60 with the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommending vaccination for ≥75 and for individuals ≥60 with chronic IC, including RD and those on immunosuppressive medications. In July 2024, RSVPreF1 was approved for ages 18–59 and RSVPreF3 for ages 50–59 at high risk, with ACIP extending recommendations to these groups in April 2025. Despite these guidelines, surveys indicate that only 16% of eligible individuals receive the RSV vaccine. Uptake is typically lowest in younger adults, minority populations, and those with lower income and educational attainment. Vaccine hesitancy in these groups is frequently cited, yet provider recommendation and patient education are well-documented factors influencing vaccine acceptance. This study assessed RSV vaccination rates among RD patients at our clinic before and after implementing provider-focused education designed to promote in-visit patient education and vaccine administration.

Methods: We queried Epic for patients aged ≥50 with RD or immunosuppressive medication use who received an RSV vaccine at the University Medical Center New Orleans (UMCNO) LSU Safety net Rheumatology Clinic between May 1, 2023, and September 2025. In late March 2025, rheumatology faculty and fellows received an educational presentation on RSV vaccines, including pre- and post-session knowledge assessments. Beginning April 1, 2025, providers were encouraged to spend 1–2 minutes during visits educating eligible patients and recommending same-day vaccination. Key talking points included hospitalization risk, mortality, and risk to grandchildren. If patients required a steroid injection, vaccination was scheduled for a follow-up visit.

Results: Between May 1, 2023, and March 31, 2025, 381 patients aged ≥50 received vaccines at our clinic. Only one patient was vaccinated for RSV in September 2024. Post-education surveys revealed substantial knowledge improvement among providers (Table 1). UMCNO is a safety net system that cares for a majority of minority and disadvantaged people. From April 1 to May 8, 2025, 37 patients were vaccinated for RSV—9 aged 50–59 and 28 aged ≥60 and were of a minority population (Figure 2).

Conclusion: Approximately 70% of patients at the LSU-UMCNO Rheumatology Clinic identify as a minority groups. Following provider education and proactive in-clinic promotion, RSV vaccination rates increased markedly in a short timeframe. These results suggest that vaccine hesitancy in minority populations may be driven more by “Provider Hesitancy”—such as limited time, competing priorities, or lack of awareness—than by patient reluctance. Focused provider engagement and in-clinic vaccine availability appear to be effective strategies to improve uptake in high-risk, diverse populations.

Supporting image 1Table 1

Supporting image 2Figure 1

Supporting image 3Figure 2


Disclosures: p. sakhamuri: None; S. Lindsey: None; C. Leggio: None; E. Mire: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

sakhamuri p, Lindsey S, Leggio C, Mire E. Are Minority Populations Truly Vaccine Hesitant? A Provider-Based Approach to RSV Vaccine Uptake Suggests Otherwise. [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/are-minority-populations-truly-vaccine-hesitant-a-provider-based-approach-to-rsv-vaccine-uptake-suggests-otherwise/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/are-minority-populations-truly-vaccine-hesitant-a-provider-based-approach-to-rsv-vaccine-uptake-suggests-otherwise/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology