ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0697

Are Fibromyalgia and Depression as Common as Any Primary Diagnosis in Routine Rheumatology Care, Albeit as Secondary Diagnoses, but Which May Confound Clinical Assessment?

Theodore Pincus1, Kathryn Gibson2, Juan Schmukler1, Tengfei Li3 and Joel Block1, 1Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, 2Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia, 3Georgetown University, Washington, DC

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Comorbidity, depression, fibromyalgia, Patient reported outcomes

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2022

Title: Epidemiology and Public Health Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Fibromyalgia (FM) and depression (DEP) are common comorbidities of all reported primary rheumatic diagnoses, easily recognized in many patients, but often underestimated, particularly in patients who meet criteria for a primary rheumatic disease. Two screening indices to recognize FM and/or DEP are found within a 2-page multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ), FAST4 (fibromyalgia assessment screening tool) and MDS2 (MDHAQ depression screen). FAST4 agrees 90% with 2011 revised FM criteria, and MDS2 agrees 80% with reference HADS-D (hospital anxiety and depression scale–DEP). We analyzed the proportion of patients with various diagnoses seen in routine rheumatology care who screened positive or negative for FM or DEP according to FAST4 or MDS2 and reference 2011 FM Criteria or HADS-D.

Methods: The MDHAQ is a 2-page patient self-report questionnaire designed for routine care, completed by most patients with all diagnoses in 5-10 minutes at all visits to 2 rheumatology sites. The MDHAQ includes a 0-10 pain VNS, 0-10 fatigue VNS, 0-3.3 DEP query, patient self-report 0-54 painful joint score, 60-symptom checklist including DEP, medical history queries, and FAST4 and MDS2 indices. FAST4 indicates FM if 3/4 of: pain VNS ≥6/10, fatigue VNS ≥6/10, self-report painful joint count ≥16/54, and/or symptom checklist ≥16/60. MDS2 indicates DEP if 0-3.3 DEP query response is ≥2.2 OR DEP is checked on the symptom checklist. The percent of patients with various primary diagnoses who were positive for FAST4, MDS2, 2011 FM revised criteria, or HADS-D was computed, including a Venn diagram for the proportions of all patients who were FAST4+/MDS2-, FAST4-/MDS2+, and FAST4+/MDS2+ at the 2 sites.

Results: Among 1,038 routine rheumatology care patients, 28.0% had an ICD-10 primary diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 12.6% osteoarthritis (OA), 6.3% primary FM, 42.0% inflammatory diagnoses other than RA and 11.1% noninflammatory diagnoses other than OA or primary FM (Table). FM 2011 revised criteria were met by 28.4% of patients, FAST4 positivity by 29.6%, HADS-D positivity by 35.1%, and MDS2 positivity by 28.6%, similar to RA, the most prevalent primary diagnosis. FM and DEP positivity according to MDHAQ indices or reference criteria were higher in OA and other non-inflammatory diseases than in RA and other inflammatory diseases, although the percent for all diagnosis categories were within 12% of all diagnoses except for FM in primary FM (Table). The Figure indicates that 11-13% of all patients were positive only for FM, 11-13% positive for only DEP, and 16-20% positive for both FM and DEP. Of patients positive for FM or DEP, about 29% were positive for either FM or DEP and 42% for both FM and DEP

Conclusion: The prevalence of FM or DEP in rheumatology patients is as high as for any primary diagnosis at these 2 rheumatology sites, feasibly recognized by FAST4 and MDS2 on an MDHAQ completed by most patients in 5-10 minutes. FM and/or DEP may confound assessment of clinical status and explain poor treatment responses in many patients.

Supporting image 1

Table. Number (percent) of patients according to Primary ICD 10 diagnosis, and percent positive by 2011 revised FM criteria fibromyalgia criteria, FAST4 (fibromyalgia assessment screening tool, HADS-D (hospital anxiety and depression scale–depression) and MDS2 (MDHAQ depression screen 2)

*The denominator is the total number of patients in the header of the column. The denominator for percentages in other columns is the total observations with non-missing specific variables for each row.
# Fibromyalgia is according to primary physician diagnosis.

Supporting image 2

Figure 1 – Venn Diagram for FAST4 by MDS2


Disclosures: T. Pincus, Medical History Services, LLC, Medical History Services LLC; K. Gibson, Eli Lilly Pty Ltd; J. Schmukler, None; T. Li, None; J. Block, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Pincus T, Gibson K, Schmukler J, Li T, Block J. Are Fibromyalgia and Depression as Common as Any Primary Diagnosis in Routine Rheumatology Care, Albeit as Secondary Diagnoses, but Which May Confound Clinical Assessment? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/are-fibromyalgia-and-depression-as-common-as-any-primary-diagnosis-in-routine-rheumatology-care-albeit-as-secondary-diagnoses-but-which-may-confound-clinical-assessment/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/are-fibromyalgia-and-depression-as-common-as-any-primary-diagnosis-in-routine-rheumatology-care-albeit-as-secondary-diagnoses-but-which-may-confound-clinical-assessment/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology