ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2220

Appropriate Investigations and Costs in Rheumatology: Residents’ Attitudes and Knowledge

Victoria YY Xu1, Neel Shah2, Christine Soong3 and Shirley Chow4, 1School of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada, 2Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 3Division of General Internal Medicine; Centre for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 4Division of Rheumatology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Education, health care cost and quality improvement, medical

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: Education Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: With the launching of the Choosing Wisely campaign, there has been a growing emphasis in the medical community on addressing unnecessary tests and procedures and their impact on patient care, costs and resources. This study aims to: 1) assess internal medicine and rheumatology residents’ attitudes towards appropriate ordering of rheumatology investigations and cost-conscious care; 2) assess residents’ knowledge of costs of care in rheumatology; and 3) identify areas of need in the post-graduate rheumatology curriculum with respect to this topic.

Methods: An anonymous survey was distributed to rheumatology trainees at several academic centres and internal medicine residents rotating at one academic hospital between July 1, 2014 and December 31, 2014. Participants were asked to rate statements on a 5-point Likert-scale and estimate costs of common rheumatology investigations. Descriptive statistics were conducted using Microsoft Excel.

Results: The survey was completed by 23 of 49 eligible participants (response rate 46.9%). Fifteen participants (65%) were female. Respondents included 5 internal medicine (post-graduate year 3) residents and 18 rheumatology trainees (post-graduate year 4-5). All participants agreed or strongly agreed that all physicians should be familiar with appropriate use of investigations and costs of care. Twenty-one (91%) participants agreed or strongly agreed that residents should receive training on this topic. Fourteen (61%) felt that teaching on this topic should be mandatory. Fourteen participants (61%) consider pretest and posttest probabilities and test sensitivity/specificity in clinical decision-making, while only eight (35%) consider costs. Only 9% of responders felt confident in appropriately ordering a whole-body bone scan, and fewer than half felt confident in appropriately ordering dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans. Participants overestimated all the costs except for complete blood count (CBC). The average discrepancy between estimated and true cost was greatest for spine MRI, uric acid level, rheumatoid factor (RF) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR).

Conclusion: The results reveal areas of need in the post-graduate curriculum with regards to appropriate ordering of rheumatology investigations and costs of care. Future steps include developing a teaching tool outlining this topic for residents.


Disclosure: V. Y. Xu, None; N. Shah, None; C. Soong, None; S. Chow, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Xu VY, Shah N, Soong C, Chow S. Appropriate Investigations and Costs in Rheumatology: Residents’ Attitudes and Knowledge [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/appropriate-investigations-and-costs-in-rheumatology-residents-attitudes-and-knowledge/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/appropriate-investigations-and-costs-in-rheumatology-residents-attitudes-and-knowledge/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology