ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1467

Antiphospholipid Antibodies and the Risk of Diffuse Alveolar Hemorrhage in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Mariana Gonzalez-Trevino1, Jeffrey Yang2, Larry J. Prokop3, Gabriel Figueroa-Parra1 and Ali Duarte-Garcia4, 1Division of Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 2Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 3Mayo Clinic Libraries, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 4Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: antiphospholipid syndrome, Autoantibody(ies), meta-analysis, pulmonary, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 13, 2023

Title: (1442–1487) SLE – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (DAH) is one of the most devastating complications of SLE. The exact pathogenesis leading to DAH in SLE is not well understood. Nonetheless, about a third of the patients with SLE have positive aPL, which are associated with non-thrombotic manifestations, including DAH. We aimed to assess the risk of DAH in patients with SLE based on their aPL profile by performing a systematic review (SR) and meta-analysis (MA).

Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Scopus were systematically searched from inception to February 2023. Studies were eligible if they included SLE patients (population) with a description of the association of the aPL status (exposure) and DAH (outcome). SLE and DAH were defined as stated by the authors of primary studies. Studies were excluded if they reported findings only for patients with SLE with specific organ involvement. Two reviewers independently screened the studies and extracted data from the reports. The main analysis explored the association between any aPL (overall) and DAH; when multiple aPL subtypes were available in the same study, we prioritized their inclusion in the main analysis in the following order: 1) LA, 2) aCL, and 3) anti-β2 glycoprotein I (aβ2GPI). Subgroup analyses were performed by each aPL subtype. Sensitivity analyses assessed the effect of excluding studies where the population included only a subset of patients with SLE. Estimates were pooled using random-effects models, and the risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We followed the PRISMA guidelines for all stages of the SR and MA.

Results: A total of 399 studies were screened. Only five met inclusion criteria (three case-control and two cohort studies), adding up to 1790 patients with SLE and 73 events of DAH (Table 1). Patients with SLE and positive aPL (any) were three times more likely to have DAH than aPL-negative patients with SLE (OR 3.37, 95% CI 1.18-9.61; I2=59%; 1745 patients; 5 studies). Subgroup analyses based on aPL subtype showed that patients with SLE and positive LA (OR=2.41, 95% CI 0.60-9.70; I2=69%; 1637 patients, 3 studies), aCL (OR=1.41, 95% CI 0.76-2.62; I2=0%; 1715 patients; 4 studies), and aβ2GPI (OR=0.48, 95% CI 0.17-1.38; I2=0%; 1623 patients; 3 studies) had no significant difference in the risk of DAH compared to negative patients (Figure 1). Risk of bias assessment showed concerns in the definition and selection of the non-exposed participants and comparability between groups. Sensitivity analysis excluding studies with hospitalized SLE controls showed that patients with SLE and positive LA were four times more likely to present with DAH than negative patients (OR=4.72, 95% CI 1.98-11.22; I2=0%; 1560 patients; 2 studies).

Conclusion: In patients with SLE, aPL positivity might increase the risk of DAH compared with negative-aPL subjects. The certainty of our findings is limited by the paucity of available evidence exploring the aPL-DAH relationship, decreasing the precision of the risk assessment by aPL subtype.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2


Disclosures: M. Gonzalez-Trevino: None; J. Yang: None; L. Prokop: None; G. Figueroa-Parra: None; A. Duarte-Garcia: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Gonzalez-Trevino M, Yang J, Prokop L, Figueroa-Parra G, Duarte-Garcia A. Antiphospholipid Antibodies and the Risk of Diffuse Alveolar Hemorrhage in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/antiphospholipid-antibodies-and-the-risk-of-diffuse-alveolar-hemorrhage-in-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/antiphospholipid-antibodies-and-the-risk-of-diffuse-alveolar-hemorrhage-in-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology