ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 166

An Analysis of Inpatient Rheumatology Consults at an Academic Military Medical Center over 16 Years: Do Consults Requests Accurately Reflect the Curriculum and Prepare Fellows for Board Certification and Future Practice?

Caitlin Cruz1 and Jess Edison 1, 1Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: consults, Education, Fellow-In-Training and fellowship programs, medical

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: Education Poster

Session Type: Poster Session (Sunday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Review inpatient rheumatology consults over the last 16 years at a major military academic medical center to analyze trends in rheumatic disease presentation, consultative requests by other services, and a representation of core educational topics for the fellowship curriculum based on medical content categories for the Rheumatology Board Examination.

Methods: The Rheumatology Fellowship documents every formal inpatient consultation request from any service. The hospital provides services for all active duty, their families, and retirees and inpatients have access to all medical subspecialties. The fellow documents date, reason for consult, and requesting service. Records were categorized by reason for consultation. If the consultation request was unclear, record review was done to determine final rheumatologic diagnosis. Each consultation request was further characterized by diagnoses into pertinent educational core categories as outlined in the 2015 core curriculum outline for rheumatology fellowship program to include: crystal-induced arthropathies, infection and related arthritis, metabolic bone disease, osteoarthritis and related disorders, rheumatoid arthritis, seronegative spondyloarthropathies, other connective tissue disorders, lupus erythematosus and antiphospholipid syndrome, nonarticular and regional musculoskeletal pain, nonrheumatic systemic disorder, vasculititides, and miscellaneous.

Results: From April 2002 until June 2018, a total of 15,0359 adult patients were hospitalized under the care of all inpatient services during this 16-year period. From this population, 1887 consultations were requested for the Rheumatology service. These consultations were completed by 41 fellows over the studied period. Overall 1.25% of admissions required an evaluation by Rheumatology. The most common consult request was evaluation for crystal-induced arthropathies at 30.68% of all consults followed by evaluation for other connective tissue disorders and systemic lupus erythematosus at 14.94% and 14.89% respectively. In comparison to the educational objectives for the board certification examination, crystal-induced arthropathies represents only 5% of tested information while other connective tissue disorders accounts for 16.5% of tested material. For the Rheumatology program, the average fellow evaluated 25 consults per academic year and 46 consults in the 24 months of fellowship.

Conclusion: The adult Rheumatology fellowship at our military academic hospital provides consultation to surgical and medicine services and provides invaluable learning and teaching experiences for the fellowship. As trends in diagnosis and treatment emerge, the fellowship curriculum should continue to change to best prepare future rheumatologists. Continued analysis of the data to identify trends over time can help to optimize graduate medical educational topics at both the residency and fellowship levels as well assist with quality improvement strategies to enhance the curriculum and resources for the future.

Figure 1. Distribution of rheumatologic disorders evaluated during hospital admission from April 2002 to June 2018.

Figure 2. Percentage of consults seen compared to the weighted breakdown of the core curriculum on the board certification examination – based on the 2015 core curriculum outline for rheumatology fellowship program-.


Disclosure: C. Cruz, None; J. Edison, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Cruz C, Edison J. An Analysis of Inpatient Rheumatology Consults at an Academic Military Medical Center over 16 Years: Do Consults Requests Accurately Reflect the Curriculum and Prepare Fellows for Board Certification and Future Practice? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/an-analysis-of-inpatient-rheumatology-consults-at-an-academic-military-medical-center-over-16-years-do-consults-requests-accurately-reflect-the-curriculum-and-prepare-fellows-for-board-certification/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/an-analysis-of-inpatient-rheumatology-consults-at-an-academic-military-medical-center-over-16-years-do-consults-requests-accurately-reflect-the-curriculum-and-prepare-fellows-for-board-certification/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology