ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1320

Acceptability and Satisfaction of an Online Resilience-Building Intervention with Peer Health Coaches for Managing Fatigue and Well-Being in Systemic Sclerosis

Susan Murphy1, Yen Chen2, Alexandra Harper2, Nirali Shah2, Mary Alore2, Sheri Hicks2, Adam Pape3 and Dinesh Khanna2, 1University of Michigan, Plymouth, MI, 2University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 3University of Michigan, University of Michigan, MI

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: education, patient, Fatigue, Patient reported outcomes, psychosocial factors, Scleroderma, Systemic

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 17, 2024

Title: Psychology/Social Sciences Poster – ARP

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Non-pharmacological fatigue management interventions in systemic sclerosis (SSc) are limited, despite people with SSc reporting that fatigue is inadequately addressed with clinical care. We designed the 12-week online peer-led resilience-building energy management (RENEW) intervention to address fatigue and other symptoms for people with SSc. This intervention integrated patient preferences and professional recommendations and was grounded in cognitive behavioral therapy principles and positive psychology. Our study aims to evaluate acceptability and satisfaction of RENEW intervention in people with SSc.

Methods: The intervention provided education for managing fatigue and other symptoms through the RENEW website/app. Participants in RENEW engaged in nine one-on-one online sessions led by trained peer health coaches with SSc over 12 weeks, weekly for the first 6 weeks then bi-weekly. Each session included discussions on setting healthy goals, tracking progress, and providing support and encouragement. Experiences with RENEW were evaluated using a questionnaire designed for the study. Acceptability (perceived usefulness and effectiveness of the intervention) and satisfaction with the website/app and health coaching were rated using 5-point Likert scales (from 1- 5; strongly disagree to strongly agree). Participants also rated the overall program quality and intervention aspects and whether they would recommend RENEW to others. Participants also provided open-ended feedback. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis.

Results: Participants in RENEW (n = 115; mean age = 54 ± 11 years) were mostly women (92%) and White (82%). Forty-four percent had diffuse SSc; 60% had an early disease duration (≤ 5 years). 63% of participants attended all health coaching sessions. Among those who completed the questionnaire (n = 105), mean Likert scores ranged from 3.4 to 4.8 (Table 1), with 99% rating RENEW as excellent or good and willing to recommend it to others with SSc. Feedback showed that 48% liked both the website/app and health coaching equally, 48% favored health coaching alone, and only 4% preferred the website alone. Reasons for valuing health coaching included the opportunity to talk with someone who is also living with SSc (50%) and feeling more accountable to achieve goals with peer health coaches (37%). Participants mentioned the three best aspects of RENEW as: 1) the supportive nature of health coaching, including providing guidance and boosting confidence in adopting healthy behaviors; 2) useful educational content on the website/app, particularly the self-care and relaxation modules; and 3) convenience and access of online meetings. Suggestions for improving RENEW included enhancing the app’s functionality and having follow-up sessions to provide ongoing support.

Conclusion: Participants with SSc rated acceptability and satisfaction highly for the peer-led RENEW intervention. These insights are valuable for refining and implementing future SSc interventions nationwide to mitigate burdensome symptoms.

Supporting image 1


Disclosures: S. Murphy: None; Y. Chen: None; A. Harper: None; N. Shah: None; M. Alore: None; S. Hicks: None; A. Pape: None; D. Khanna: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, Amgen, 2, AstraZeneca, 2, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, Cabaletta, 2, Certa Therapeutics, 2, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, Janssen, 2, MDI Therapeutics, 8, Merck/MSD, 2, Novartis, 2, Zura Bio, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Murphy S, Chen Y, Harper A, Shah N, Alore M, Hicks S, Pape A, Khanna D. Acceptability and Satisfaction of an Online Resilience-Building Intervention with Peer Health Coaches for Managing Fatigue and Well-Being in Systemic Sclerosis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/acceptability-and-satisfaction-of-an-online-resilience-building-intervention-with-peer-health-coaches-for-managing-fatigue-and-well-being-in-systemic-sclerosis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/acceptability-and-satisfaction-of-an-online-resilience-building-intervention-with-peer-health-coaches-for-managing-fatigue-and-well-being-in-systemic-sclerosis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology