ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1650

Abnormal Serologies in the Absence of Clinical Activity Do Not Predict New or Recurrent Lupus Nephritis During Pregnancy

Jill P. Buyon1, Aanam Aslam2, Marta M. Guerra2, Michael D. Lockshin3, Carl A. Laskin4, Ware Branch5, Lisa R. Sammaritano6, Michelle Petri7, Joan T. Merrill8, Allen D. Sawitzke9 and Jane E. Salmon6, 1Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, 2Rheumatology 3rd Fl Rsrch, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 3Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, 4University of Toronto and LifeQuest Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Toronto, ON, Canada, 5Obsterics and Gynecology, Univ of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 6Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 7Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 8Clinical Pharmacology Research Program, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, 9Rheumatology, University of Utah Medical Ctr, Salt Lake City, UT

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: anti-dsDNA, Lupus nephritis, pregnancy and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - Clinical Aspects and Treatment II: Clinical Aspects/Pregnancy

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Renal disease is a critical concern of physicians counseling lupus patients regarding pregnancy. In patients without a history of kidney disease, does pregnancy increase the risk of first time involvement? In patients with previous renal disease, does pregnancy raise the likelihood of a renal flare? In both cases, prediction of outcome is challenging in a clinically stable patient with serologic activity (abnormal anti-dsDNA antibodies coupled with low complements). Accordingly, our objective was to assess serologic activity as a predictor of renal flares during pregnancy in patients with less than 1 gram of protein at enrollment in a large, prospective, multicenter, mutiethnic study.

Methods: The PROMISSE Study (Predictors of pRegnancy Outcome: BioMarkers In antiphospholipid antibody Syndrome and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus) prospectively evaluated 391 pregnant SLE patients. Exclusion criteria were multi-fetal pregnancy, prednisone >20mg/d, proteinuria >1gm/24hr, and creatinine >1.2mg.dL. A renal flare was defined by proteinuria increase of >500mg with or without hematuria and/or red blood cell casts. Of the 391 patients, 121 (31%) had preexisting renal disease as defined by ACR SLE criteria and/or a renal biopsy in 53 of whom 4% were Class I or II, 62% were Class III or IV, 13% were Class III/IV & V, and 21% were Class V. Overall at enrollment, 17% had only positive anti-dsDNA, 12% had only hypocomplementemia, 20% had both, and 51% were normal for both parameters.

Results: 16 renal flares occurred in 121 patients with previous renal disease. All had proteinuria, 5 (31%) had hematuria, and 1 (6%) had red blood cell casts. There were no differences between biopsy classes for patients with and without renal flares. Of the 29 patients with a history of renal disease and both anti-dsDNA and hypocomplementemia, 5 (17%) had a renal flare. In 44 patients with either serology alone, 7(16%) had renal flares. In 48 patients with neither serology, 4 (8%) had renal flares. 5 patients were treated with increased prednisone. 3 treated patients and 2 untreated patients developed pre-eclampsia. Other adverse pregnancy outcomes included 3 (19%) fetal/neonatal deaths and 2 (13%) with SGA <5th %ile in the 16 patients with renal flares. In 270 patients with no history of kidney disease, only 3 renal flares occurred. Of the 50 patients with no history of renal disease and both anti-dsDNA and hypocomplementemia, 2 (4%) had new onset proteinuria; one was treated and developed pre-eclampsia. In 150 patients with neither serology, 1 had new onset proteinuria which was treated and had SGA <5th %ile. None of 70 with either serology alone had renal flares.

Conclusion: These data provide evidence that clinical quiescence or stability at the time of conception favors good renal outcomes during pregnancy regardless of serologic activity. Increased proteinuria (not uniformly requiring prednisone) occurred in 13% of patients with previous renal disease and 1% of those without a history of kidney disease. Thus, in counseling women with lupus who are contemplating pregnancy, abnormal serology alone should not lead to advising against pregnancy even in patients with previous renal disease.


Disclosure:

J. P. Buyon,
None;

A. Aslam,
None;

M. M. Guerra,
None;

M. D. Lockshin,
None;

C. A. Laskin,
None;

W. Branch,
None;

L. R. Sammaritano,
None;

M. Petri,
None;

J. T. Merrill,
None;

A. D. Sawitzke,
None;

J. E. Salmon,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/abnormal-serologies-in-the-absence-of-clinical-activity-do-not-predict-new-or-recurrent-lupus-nephritis-during-pregnancy/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology