ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1184

A Wearable-Sensor for Assessment of Gait and Chair Stand Patterns in People with Knee Osteoarthritis: Validation and Responsiveness to Treatment of a Potential Digital Biomarker

Deepak Kumar1, Lukas Adamowicz2, Benjamin Senderling1, Mary Gheller1, Michael LaValley3, Kathryn Bacon1, Pirinka Georgiev2, Charmaine Demanuele2, Paul Wacnik2 and Tuhina Neogi4, 1Boston University, Boston, MA, 2Pfizer Inc., Cambridge, MA, 3Boston University School of Public Health, Arlington, MA, 4Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Biomarkers, Biomechanics, Osteoarthritis, pain, physical therapy

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 13, 2023

Title: (1183–1199) Osteoarthritis – Clinical Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: The objectives of this study in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA) were to (a) examine the agreement between measures of gait and chair stand patterns derived from a wearable-sensor and those from gold-standard motion capture, (b) assess the correlation between wearable-sensor derived measures and standard functional measures, and (c) examine the responsiveness of wearable-sensor derived measures to an exercise-based physical therapy intervention.

Methods: We conducted a single-arm clinical trial (NCT04243096) of a 12-week exercise intervention in people with symptomatic knee OA (n = 60, age = 66.3±7.4 years; 75% women; BMI = 29.0±4.8 kg/m2). Participants received 18 sessions of an exercise-based physical therapy intervention over 12 weeks. Spatiotemporal gait parameters and measures of chair stand mechanics (Table 2) were extracted from an inertial sensor worn on the lower back as well as from optical motion capture during walking at self-selected pace and chair stand tasks. Agreement between sensor and motion capture measures was examined using intraclass coefficients (ICC [2,1]). Participants also completed standard functional tests including a walking test (28-meters), 5 times chair stand test, and a 6-minute walk test, while wearing the inertial sensor and correlations between sensor derived measures and functional measures were assessed. The wearable sensor measures with excellent agreement with motion capture and standard measures during functional tests were evaluated with mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) models with visit as a categorical factor adjusting for age, sex, BMI, and presence of comorbidities.

Results: The agreement between sensor and motion capture derived measures was excellent (ICC ≥ 0.75) for cadence, stride duration, step duration, and stance duration, good (0.6≤ICC≤0.74) for initial double support duration, terminal double support duration, total double support duration, and swing time, and moderate (0.4≤ICC≤0.59) for step length and gait speed (Table 1). Sensor derived measures and functional measures were significantly correlated in the expected directions with somewhat stronger correlations during 6-minute walk (range 0.68-0.90) vs. and 5-time chair stand (range 0.67-0.70) vs. 28-meter walk (range 0.46-0.65). With the intervention, all sensor derived measures showed significant improvements in all functional tests with the improvement maintained from 12- to 18-weeks (Figure 1 and 2).

Conclusion: Multiple measures of gait and chair stand patterns derived using a single inertial sensor demonstrate good agreement with gold-standard measures derived from motion capture. Spatial measures (step length, speed) performed worse than temporal measures. Sensor derived measures are moderately correlated with standard functional outcomes and may provide additional information not captured by standard measures. Sensor derived measures are responsive to change with an effective treatment and potentially could serve as digital biomarker for monitoring or treatment response.

Supporting image 1

Table 1. Agreement between sensor and motion-capture derived measures using data from baseline, week 12, and week 18 visits.

Supporting image 2

Figure 1. Adjusted means for sensor-derived measures (with excellent agreement) and standard functional measures at baseline, week 6, week 12, and week 18 during the 6-minute walk test (left) and 28-meter walk test (right). * indicates significant change compared to baseline.

Supporting image 3

Figure 2. Standardized response means for change from baseline to week 12 in sensor-derived measures (with excellent agreement) and standard functional measures during 6-minute walk test (left) and 28-meter walk test (right)


Disclosures: D. Kumar: Eli Lilly, 5, Pfizer, 5; L. Adamowicz: Pfizer, 3; B. Senderling: None; M. Gheller: None; M. LaValley: None; K. Bacon: None; P. Georgiev: Pfizer, 3, 11; C. Demanuele: Pfizer, 3, 11; P. Wacnik: Pfizer, 11; T. Neogi: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Kumar D, Adamowicz L, Senderling B, Gheller M, LaValley M, Bacon K, Georgiev P, Demanuele C, Wacnik P, Neogi T. A Wearable-Sensor for Assessment of Gait and Chair Stand Patterns in People with Knee Osteoarthritis: Validation and Responsiveness to Treatment of a Potential Digital Biomarker [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-wearable-sensor-for-assessment-of-gait-and-chair-stand-patterns-in-people-with-knee-osteoarthritis-validation-and-responsiveness-to-treatment-of-a-potential-digital-biomarker/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-wearable-sensor-for-assessment-of-gait-and-chair-stand-patterns-in-people-with-knee-osteoarthritis-validation-and-responsiveness-to-treatment-of-a-potential-digital-biomarker/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology